Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
nick1981

New Gibson J-15

Recommended Posts

Hello!

 

I purchased online last Friday, and it arrived yesterday, a new Gibson J-15. The seller is a big store in the UK, not a private seller, and the price paid was the full price minus some minor discount you would expect to get off the list price anyway. The guitar arrived in a Gibson box that was stapled so I assume the guitar had not been out of its case since it left the factory in January (according to the date in the brochure) and it was in excellent condition. However I was really surprised to see the wood near the jack as in the pictures. What is going on here? First of all, the guitar should have walnut sides and back and walnut is dark, what is this wood that they used? Is the rest actually just painted on top? Did they accidentally cut it incorrectly and that is some random wood used to finish it? The guitar is going back but is this normal? I mean it is not a small defect....

 

What are your thoughts?

 

Thanks!

7a09a10889e68ae0bd1051be74045d7e.thumb.jpg.afa3b24b9c808f4c5cb9575d7ed9d94c.jpg

2e5c46990ce1d51efe7e9e043dedf8b4.thumb.jpg.8fb2fde753010add580198af6c9a65f8.jpg

59b5a47bc76088de1edee46ca28ae7b1.thumb.jpg.a4ccecf9bfaf143a55c5a50a32bc31f7.jpg

c8d9d0302271ff80fab6fe07d69ce878.thumb.jpg.424fb7ed801f9299933318d57cbaa34b.jpg

4fe96b0fa267f6241eee361f96f50715.thumb.jpg.02c426a6a59e484f33596993cebf5138.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks like walnut to me - the lighter colored strip near the top? Probably still walnut but probably heartwood or something... the color is definitely off, and I'm surprised it's that inconsistent, but walnut can have some blonde streaks and areas in it.

 

How's it sound?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lighter colored wood is "sap wood", not uncommon in walnut and sometimes prized when it can be book matched in the center of the back of a guitar. They just did a really poor job of matching the two sides - they probably were book matched but them one was shifted relative to the other when they were bent and glued up. Whether i bothers you enough to return it is up to you, it shouldn't affect sound, strength or playability

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Freeman Keller. This kind of discoloration is common with many woods. It should not affect sound, playability or durability. But, frankly, it shows the lack of care taken into consideration at Gibson's factory in Bozeman. They do a solid job, but they do it just by the book, by the numbers. With such strong discoloration, a bit more care and possibly a different alignment or cut would have produced a visibly better outcome. But it won't change sound, playability or durability ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Others have already weighed in as to what's happening. Personally, if I paid Gibson prices I'd expect a better looking guitar than that. You might disagree. For now, Congratulations and Happy New Guitar Day. :thu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Send it back. Stuff like that is simply poor quality control and if allowed to continue it will bode poorly for Gibson. The people involved with releasing that guitar for market sale need to be called out onto the carpet at Gibson so state your case well. They need to answer for their poor judgement with more than a shoulder shrug and a gee golly I'm sorry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, thank you for your replies. The retailer agreed to swap it for a different J-15 so all is good. I didn't know about sapwood, this is my first acoustic, but personally and since all is OK build wise I wouldn't mind the mismatching too much although I do agree it is a bit of an eyesore. Given that I was given the opportunity to swap it, I went for it - new guitar arrives today. Thanks!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi guys' date=' thank you for your replies. T[b']he retailer agreed to swap it for a different J-15 so all is good[/b]. I didn't know about sapwood, this is my first acoustic, but personally and since all is OK build wise I wouldn't mind the mismatching too much although I do agree it is a bit of an eyesore. Given that I was given the opportunity to swap it, I went for it - new guitar arrives today. Thanks!

 

:philthumb:

 

Good cause that's not right.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a J-15 and you can't expect the same quality control at gibson for their cheapos as for their (over)high priced models :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's a J-15 and you can't expect the same quality control at gibson for their cheapos as for their (over)high priced models :)

"Cheapo" (by Gibson pricing standards) or not, it's still a $1700 guitar and I'd expect better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Cheapo" (by Gibson pricing standards) or not, it's still a $1700 guitar and I'd expect better.

 

cheapo in the gibson universe, on the street you can get one for $1300.

 

if i would be in the market for a new accoustic and have a budget of $1300-$1500 i would not look at gibson and pay a whole bunch just for the brand

name. with this amount of money you can get a premium guitar almost custom shop quality from not so famous brands, with much better quality control etc....

i does not say gibson, but it sounds great and plays great

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cheapo in the gibson universe, on the street you can get one for $1300.

 

if i would be in the market for a new accoustic and have a budget of $1300-$1500 i would not look at gibson and pay a whole bunch just for the brand

name. with this amount of money you can get a premium guitar almost custom shop quality from not so famous brands, with much better quality control etc....

i does not say gibson, but it sounds great and plays great

A quick Google search showed them selling for $1500-1750 new, $1000-1100 used. I took something close to the upper end for a new guitar. I'm sure if I were sufficiently determined I could find one for less.

 

That's kinda the point though, isn't it? If I'm paying for a new Gibson I expect a halfway decent guitar at any price point. I don't necessarily expect a whole lot of "bang for the buck" though, because that's not where Gibson is focused. Instead, you get an expensive name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Walnut isn't so rare that they need to use pieces with sapwood like that....and if they do decide to do it for artsy effect, they should use it on the back to match the sides and bookmatch it better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I play guitar, I don't notice the wood on the bottom of the guitar. The only decent Gibson acoustic I ever played (1 in about 7, I think) that sounded really good was a J-29. Would've bought it, too, if the dealer had offered a better deal.

 

Anyways, enjoy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...