Jump to content

What does the word "quality" mean to you when talking about gear?


grunge782

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Great question!

 

For me it means: Does it do the job?

 

In turn that can mean many things depending on whether you have defined "the job" as being making music, looking like furniture, impressing a woman enough for her to get her knickers off, selling for more than you bought it for, ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Beats me. Way better than half the crap I see you guys whine about are things that wouldn't put me off a guitar for a second.

 

I'm looking for weight normally. Any glaring issues with the worksmanship will be given attention, obviously. But, I don't put a guitar back for anything that a setup will fix - sharp fret ends, poor action, crappy nut, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me it means that it was built solid. Nothing on it feels like you might break it. Quality gear can be abused and still work as intended.

 

For example: When I was in high school I had a Fender Deluxe 85 that I hauled to friends houses, parties, etc. It got banged around a lot. I lost it once coming down concrete steps and I was sure it was never going to work again, but it was fine. I sold that amp to a friend after high school. I ran into him a couple years ago and he says he still uses it for home and rehearsals. That's quality IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dictionary.com had this to say (among other things):

 

 

character with respect to fineness, or grade of excellence: food of poor quality; silks of fine quality.

 

high grade; superiority; excellence: wood grain of quality.

 

That's what I mean when I use the word in gear associated discussions. In the world of 'verything is relative' quality is just that too. Better quality gear is better in relation to gear that is not as good. Some of those things are easily defined and some are very subjective...I'll take a mahogany neck (with a truss rod) and mahogany body guitar with hand wound pickups and well-installed level frets over something that is *strange name wood* with terrible frets. So...I'll take the higher quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Beats me. Way better than half the crap I see you guys whine about are things that wouldn't put me off a guitar for a second.


I'm looking for weight normally. Any glaring issues with the worksmanship will be given attention, obviously. But, I don't put a guitar back for anything that a setup will fix - sharp fret ends, poor action, crappy nut, etc.

 

 

Sharp fret ends I could live with. But I wouldn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Dictionary.com had this to say (among other things):



character with respect to fineness, or grade of excellence: food of poor quality; silks of fine quality.


high grade; superiority; excellence: wood grain of quality.


That's what I mean when I use the word in gear associated discussions. In the world of 'verything is relative' quality is just that too. Better quality gear is better in relation to gear that is not as good. Some of those things are easily defined and some are very subjective...I'll take a mahogany neck (with a truss rod) and mahogany body guitar with hand wound pickups and well-installed level frets over something that is *strange name wood* with terrible frets. So...I'll take the higher quality.

 

 

 

One must also consider which measure is being used. "Quality" in relation or comparison to what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

To me it means that it was built solid. Nothing on it feels like you might break it. Quality gear can be abused and still work as intended.


For example: When I was in high school I had a Fender Deluxe 85 that I hauled to friends houses, parties, etc. It got banged around a lot. I lost it once coming down concrete steps and I was sure it was never going to work again, but it was fine. I sold that amp to a friend after high school. I ran into him a couple years ago and he says he still uses it for home and rehearsals. That's quality IMO.

 

This. And thus quality is objective.

 

I might add, though, that a quality product also sounds great - it's musical, perhaps transparent, maybe even "organic", etc. - and so the concept becomes subjective (to some extent).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me it means many things.

 

Some examples related to guitars would be:

 

Did they choose nice resonant wood, or just glue together whatever they could find?

Did they spend time sanding the neck to a perfect feel, or did they just give it one or two quick sands after it came off the CNC machine and didn't really care?

Did they join the neck to the body tightly or do they just cut a pocket loosely to save time and money?

Did they use a long tenon or did they skimp for cost sake?

Did they choose a nice thin finish which takes more time to apply, or did they just spray on whatever goes on quickly and looks decent?

Did they choose cheap electronics or quality stuff with a proven durability?

Did they finish the frets by rounding the ends of them or did they just file them at that typical angel to get it done faster and save time?

Do the inlays have glue marks around them or are they perfect?

Did they cut the nut properly?

And most importantly after all is said and done...if the guitar they built just doesn't end up sounding good...do they reject it or allow it out into the market?

 

Those are all just examples but it comes down to pride in workmanship and a company's own standards that they set for themselves to build the best product they can. Quality exists in pretty much every product you can think of. And it's pretty easy to see and feel the difference.

 

And quality exists way beyond products. There is quality in the work that people do. And quality in Art as well....but then that aspect of quality is subjective in my opinion. The elements of building a good product are not subjective. You either build to the best standards possible at a given time...or you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me it means many things.


Some examples related to guitars would be:


Did they choose nice resonant wood, or just glue together whatever they could find?

Did they spend time sanding the neck to a perfect feel, or did they just give it one or two quick sands after it came off the CNC machine and didn't really care?

Did they join the neck to the body tightly or do they just cut a pocket loosely to save time and money?

Did they use a long tenon or did they skimp for cost sake?

Did they choose a nice thin finish which takes more time to apply, or did they just spray on whatever goes on quickly and looks decent?

Did they choose cheap electronics or quality stuff with a proven durability?

Did they finish the frets by rounding the ends of them or did they just file them at that typical angel to get it done faster and save time?

Do the inlays have glue marks around them or are they perfect?

Did they cut the nut properly?

And most importantly after all is said and done...if the guitar they built just doesn't end up sounding good...do they reject it or allow it out into the market?


Those are all just examples but it comes down to pride in workmanship and a company's own standards that they set for themselves to build the best product they can. Quality exists in pretty much every product you can think of. And it's pretty easy to see and feel the difference.


And quality exists way beyond products. There is quality in the work that people do. And quality in Art as well....but then that aspect of quality is subjective in my opinion. The elements of building a good product are not subjective. You either build to the best standards possible at a given time...or you don't.

 

This is a quality post. :thu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...