Members boosh Posted September 9, 2010 Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 I found this site last nite. Wow....... there are way more conspiracy theories about this than I thought.http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/index1.htm Lol that's funny. The guy who makes that website is from my town in The Netherlands. I've met him and corresponded with him and a Lady called " Judyth Vary Baker" she claims to be the mistress of Lee Harvey Oswald. She told me and my wife very interesting things when having dinner with her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lukenskywalker Posted September 9, 2010 Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 Lol that's funny. The guy who makes that website is from my town in The Netherlands. I've met him and corresponded with him and a Lady called " Judyth Vary Baker" she claims to be the mistress of Lee Harvey Oswald. She told me and my wife very interesting things when having dinner with her.you travel in some VERY mysterious circles Boosh....you Godamn frighten me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rasputin1963 Posted September 9, 2010 Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 Not arguing about that or agreeing.....but Ras, why would they do it that way? That is what I cannot wrap my head around. What genius came up with the idea to do it so publically....all the logistics, the room for error....bringing in a bozo like Oswald who had to have known he was going to take the fall? That was a suicide mission. And placing a shooter on the grassy knoll with so many John Q Public around? Camera's everywhere....makes no sense.I mean...if some secret group high up wanted Kennedy dead......with everything they had available.....JFK could have had a "heart attack" or some other poison induced deal that would not show up in autopsy....they had stuff for that right? Unless it is quite true that LBJ, in his arrogant fashion, spearheaded the rub-out.... and wanted a big Texas-sized piece of juicy "theater" to take place... Somebody was trying to "send a message". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members nice keetee Posted September 12, 2010 Members Share Posted September 12, 2010 this question was directed to the thread in general or thread in general. i would not have used a carcano even in 1963 for the mission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Flogger59 Posted September 14, 2010 Members Share Posted September 14, 2010 I don't know for certain who killed Kennedy, if he acted alone, whatever. I do know that elements within the US government in that era had no apparent moral or ethical problem whatsoever in attempting to kill foreign leaders or other 'inconvenient' international figures. I also know that the path of the so-called 'magic bullet' and the nearly as improbable circumstances of its discovery in the folds of the blanket on the stretcher used to transport wounded Texas governor John Connally to the hospital stretch my credulity past the breaking point -- and that Connally himself disputed the single bullet/Oswald theory of the crime until he died.But I also know that there's a highly disreputable and far-from-truth-respecting industry that has grown up around the JFK assasination.And I know from poking around through many of the videos and such that are often cited in threads such as these as 'evidence' of this or that that most of those cottage industry conspiracy theory mongers or themselves often almost completely bereft of common sense, respect for real research, or even a modicum of credibility.Evidence of my contention about the conspiracy theorists?Just look at how many of the conspiracy videos, blogs, and articles can't even get the spelling of Connally's name right. Seriously, just Google it and you have cross section x-ray of credulous fools, untrustworthy conspiracy mongerers, delusional wack jobs, and sleazy opportunists. The "Magic Bullet Theory" is predicated on the assumption that Gov. Connally was sitting directly ahead of Kennedy at the same height. Connally was on a jumpseat that was inboard and lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MrGretsch Posted September 14, 2010 Members Share Posted September 14, 2010 Yes/Si...big time....For what is is worth, JFK was the first American President to be accepted by the American Middle Class, the Dirt Poor, the Black populace,....both North and South, as a President that (at the time of his death) that truly represented the US 'melting plot'.Gee, did the twelve years from 1932-1944 just disappear from your reality? Franklin Delano Roosevelt was very popular....among all but rich Republicans. FDR probably did more for the poor and middle class than any other president. You know, getting the US out of a depression, rural elctrification, public works, Social Security...the list just goes on and on. Just my opinion, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rasputin1963 Posted September 15, 2010 Members Share Posted September 15, 2010 But I also know that there's a highly disreputable and far-from-truth-respecting industry that has grown up around the JFK assasination.And I know from poking around through many of the videos and such that are often cited in threads such as these as 'evidence' of this or that that most of those cottage industry conspiracy theory mongers or themselves often almost completely bereft of common sense, respect for real research, or even a modicum of credibility.Evidence of my contention about the conspiracy theorists?Just look at how many of the conspiracy videos, blogs, and articles can't even get the spelling of Connally's name right. Seriously, just Google it and you have cross section x-ray of credulous fools, untrustworthy conspiracy mongerers, delusional wack jobs, and sleazy opportunists. Which is why, in my first commentary on this thread, I kind of give an explanation that, to me, is very "Occam's Razor". Just looking at the most obvious vectors in the case.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members philbo Posted September 15, 2010 Members Share Posted September 15, 2010 One of the lesser known parallels between Lincoln & Kennedy: 3 weeks before he died, Lincoln was in Monroe, Maryland. 3 weeks before Kennedy died, he was in... well you fill in the blank... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lukenskywalker Posted September 15, 2010 Members Share Posted September 15, 2010 Yes/Si...big time... For what is is worth, JFK was the first American President to be accepted by the American Middle Class, the Dirt Poor, the Black populace,....both North and South, as a President that (at the time of his death) that truly represented the US 'melting plot'. Gee, did the twelve years from 1932-1944 just disappear from your reality? Franklin Delano Roosevelt was very popular....among all but rich Republicans. FDR probably did more for the poor and middle class than any other president. You know, getting the US out of a depression, rural elctrification, public works, Social Security...the list just goes on and on. Just my opinion, of course. totally right, thanks for the wake up call...If my Dad were still alive he would 've smacked me upside my head.:poke:As Jesse Winchester wrote about Franklin 'D'...'Good God Almighty, he's the Poor Mans Friend'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lukenskywalker Posted September 15, 2010 Members Share Posted September 15, 2010 One of the lesser known parallels between Lincoln & Kennedy: 3 weeks before he died, Lincoln was in Monroe, Maryland. 3 weeks before Kennedy died, he was in... well you fill in the blank... Dude, dude, Dude... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ernest Buckley Posted September 15, 2010 Members Share Posted September 15, 2010 Sure, it matters to a lot of people - but is some conspiracy theorist on the Internet going to figure out what "really happened" just from watching the same videos that everyone else is watching?Not very likely. If there's any truth to any of the conspiracies, it'll be discovered by someone with a lot more information than what we have now. So to me, it's not worth wasting energy on this stuff. It may matter to some people just for their curiousity but other than that, it changes nothing. The gov`t will not be releasing any additional footage, they just don`t. So this entire issue is dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bp Posted September 16, 2010 Members Share Posted September 16, 2010 Here's film from the other side of the vehicle - [YOUTUBE]OvbvvAYimgM[/YOUTUBE] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rasputin1963 Posted September 16, 2010 Members Share Posted September 16, 2010 Interesting, BP... what does this angle reveal that the Zapruder film did not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ermghoti II Posted September 16, 2010 Members Share Posted September 16, 2010 Can't view at work. IIRC, It's shows Connolly's position better, debunking the magic bullet conspiracy; ie, it shows the bullet took a straight, or nearly straight path. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bp Posted September 16, 2010 Members Share Posted September 16, 2010 Interesting, BP... what does this angle reveal that the Zapruder film did not? It's shot from the other side than Zapruder filmed from. It's not a film you see often. The copy I saw years ago was much better quality than this. It didn't reveal much of anything that I picked up on though some folks clain you can see the driver taking the kill shot in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bp Posted September 16, 2010 Members Share Posted September 16, 2010 [YOUTUBE]11Fl9ZVJ7B8[/YOUTUBE] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members techristian Posted September 16, 2010 Author Members Share Posted September 16, 2010 Someone walked in front of the camera right at the critical time! Then you see Jackie trying to escape. How can anything useful be extracted from that? Dan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lee Flier Posted September 16, 2010 Members Share Posted September 16, 2010 Don`t think for one minute that Stones "JFK" is historically true. Its full of opinions and myths. Entertaining yes but thats about it. Correct. Stone pisses me off because he rewrites history in most of his films and people believe his version. We`ll never get all the details for this so lets just move on.Some people find it interesting to discuss, obviously. If you don't, you don't have to read the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lukenskywalker Posted September 17, 2010 Members Share Posted September 17, 2010 ^Yes Lee, In his Viet Nam movie Triolgy, it's obvious that he actually 'walked the walk' with his Service 'In Country'.... but his recollection seemed clouded by the petty rivalries he might ave experienced based on Race, choice of recreational mind {censored}ing (Smoke verses Alcohol) and he seemed to have a disdain for Southern 'Crackers', and certainly bore a grudge against The Officer Corps in 'Platoon' He did these movies while the memories of Viet Nam were relatively fresh in his mind... I wonder now, like most older Soldiers, if he is looking back at his 'Warrior' years in a different light, and thinking of them as halcyon 'glory days'. just 'wunnering', Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members the stranger Posted September 17, 2010 Members Share Posted September 17, 2010 Correct. Stone pisses me off because he rewrites history in most of his films and people believe his version. Everybody rewrites history. Did he get you to think? I think that's more his intent. And everybody sees things from their own perspectives. The fact that people believe a movie story says a lot more about those people than Oliver Stone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Lee Flier Posted September 17, 2010 Members Share Posted September 17, 2010 Everybody rewrites history. Sure, but some people at least attempt to base their version on facts. Did he get you to think? I think that's more his intent. I don't get that feeling from his work... I feel that where he's coming from is more based on ego - the desire to remake things in his own image and, of course, get a lot of people to fill theater seats in the process. And everybody sees things from their own perspectives. Perspectives and facts are two different things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ernest Buckley Posted September 17, 2010 Members Share Posted September 17, 2010 Some people find it interesting to discuss, obviously. If you don't, you don't have to read the thread. I hear ya. Don`t mind me, I`ve been a little crabby of late and I tend to take it out here on HC from time to time. Funny thing is, I`ve been watching all these videos since this thread started fully knowing, the answer is no different. Its a curiousity thing... watching a Presidents assassination is disturbing and watching how people respond is truly fascinating... The whole thing is unfortunate but we seem to thrive on this stuff. Strange... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members nice keetee Posted September 18, 2010 Members Share Posted September 18, 2010 I can see that you are putting a lot of time and effort into your blog and detailed articles! I am deeply in love with every single piece of information you post here. Will be back often to read more updates! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ggm1960 Posted September 19, 2010 Members Share Posted September 19, 2010 The fact that people believe a movie story says a lot more about those people than Oliver Stone. It says they're lazy and/or they really don't care about history or the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ernest Buckley Posted September 19, 2010 Members Share Posted September 19, 2010 It says they're lazy and/or they really don't care about history or the truth.The average movie goer wants to be entertained. They don`t mind the truth being stretched; because sometimes, reality isn`t that interesting. Hence the popularity of porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.