Jump to content

Enough Walters, Phil please cut him off...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Originally posted by Brittanylips

one man's use of a medium to satarize the medium itself:




Now, if you don't laugh at that, you aint got no pulse.

 

 

Oh. My. God.

 

No, seriously.

 

I especially liked the parts where X out of Y people actually found these reviews helpful.

 

 

As a Christian I do not think it appropriate for Al Green to claim he has an immortal soul, when we know that only Jesus, God and Fred Savage (for his work in the Wonder Years and to a lesser extent in Vice Versa - he doesn't dissapoint) have this gift. Al Green should verily be punished for his vanity.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Originally posted by geek_usa

{censored}ing hell,


if Phil can ban half a dozen wanks in the Amps forum, he can certainly ban Walters.


If this is not the case, there is certainly some cock pulling going on in the HC forums that we don't know about.

 

he has no accidently hot-link a pic of tubgirl first, you know? something really bad like that.:thu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

had to chip in,

long time reader, only occasional poster.

 

Mr. Walters9515 seems to exists only to waste

peoples time and good intentions here at HC.

 

Not that this is any popularity contest; I've seen

where902190 to be occasionally.... less polite

than I would prefer, but he CONTRIBUTES; he knows

some stuff, he asks some ACTUAL QUESTIONS, and has

meaningful interaction in the forums.

 

this is quite different from Walters9515 behavior;

he does not contribute, he antagonizes people (yes,

you can choose to ignore people, but that gets in the way if the

actual purpose of HC, doesn't it?) and generally

clutters up the otherwise wonderful place I've found

HC to be.

 

I find the comparison of walters9515 to a

"rock in the ocean" to be sadly lacking;

rocks in the ocean can only be eliminated by

expensive, time consuming means; by no means

is HC "the ocean", when the greater internet is

available for consultation.

I would personally vote for getting rid of walters, should such

a thing be possible, but then again, when I need some

entertainment, or bison or rabbit recipes I suppose he has

his place.

 

cheers.

C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by chugheshc

had to chip in,

long time reader, only occasional poster.


Mr. Walters9515 seems to exists only to waste

peoples time and good intentions here at HC.


Not that this is any popularity contest; I've seen

where902190 to be occasionally.... less polite

than I would prefer, but he CONTRIBUTES; he knows

some stuff, he asks some ACTUAL QUESTIONS, and has

meaningful interaction in the forums.


this is quite different from Walters9515 behavior;

he does not contribute, he antagonizes people (yes,

you can choose to ignore people, but that gets in the way if the

actual purpose of HC, doesn't it?) and generally

clutters up the otherwise wonderful place I've found

HC to be.


I find the comparison of walters9515 to a

"rock in the ocean" to be sadly lacking;

rocks in the ocean can only be eliminated by

expensive, time consuming means; by no means

is HC "the ocean", when the greater internet is

available for consultation.

I would personally vote for getting rid of walters, should such

a thing be possible, but then again, when I need some

entertainment, or bison or rabbit recipes I suppose he has

his place.


cheers.

C.

 

This is a decent analogy, but the real question is: If the bear does indeed {censored} in the woods, DOES he actually use the rabbit to finish the job or merely allows the residual to exist in hopes that other predators stay FAR away from him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...