Jump to content

OT: anybody drive a hybrid car?


bluesboy

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Explain that to Toyota who hocks it's entire diesel line across the rest of the world. Hybrids are a cluster{censored} of {censored} marketed to the American public as a fashion statement.


"Oh go me!! I bought a Hybrid!!"
:facepalm:

Keep in mind that the Jetta TDI is quite a bit bigger than a Prius. If more car makers put diesels in their compact car lines, we'd see a lot more impressive numbers. Look at the Camry Hybrid. 33mpg city and 34mph highway. Not so impressive when you get outside of the tiny, plastic cars.

 

I guarantee tech developed for the current gen hybrids will live on into the next fuel source, be it H2 or whatever. Especially since battery technology is going to be making big strides in the next 50 years. MIT has been producing some impressive, preliminary, stuff as of late with regards to new energy storage, and energy transfer tech. Bottom line is, the hybrid tech has generated some pretty ingenious ways to increase efficiency, no matter what your consumable fuel source is.

 

Bio-diesel or new turbo diesel, is only a temporary technology as time is limited for all crude oil based fuels.

 

Both the current gen of hybrid gas/battery and bio-diesel will not be lasting technologies. So, if you're buying a new car, it's best to consider them short term investments.

 

As far as how good a product they are, it's close but you have to take the long view, and estimate how the world will change around the car you buy. Turbo-diesel probably won't ever be convenient since it would be folly to infastructurally invest in expanding Diesel distribution, for the reason I gave above. As for hybrids, the fears about replacing expensive batteries in hybrids is legitimate, but details are completely unknown and very hard to predict. It's certain that, the more prevalent battery based hybrids become, the cheaper servicing batteries will be. I expect the technology to survive into the next fuel source, so I expect the use of these type batteries to increase, and as stated the result will be the cost associated with them will go down.

 

Following that line of reasoning, hybrids do seem like a better investment to me.

 

To me, the impressive bit about the Prius was the design of the vehicle. It was small but very roomy for driver and passengers, with lots of cargo room depending on the configuration. Everything was moved around so as to reduce the waisted space in conventionally designed vehicles. And since it's so much car in such a small, light package, it works very well with Hybrid technology. The design of cars is really undergoing a revolution, and the prius is a great example of it, hybrid technology aside. Decreasing weight in vehicles, and more compact designs has been the trend for 30 years, and will continue to be the trend. So, claiming that it only works in light weight vehicles, and therefor doesn't really work for "real cars", is a false problem as cars in the future will no look like do now or how they have in the past.

 

Also, I expect more specialization in cars in the future. Less "jack of all trade" truck/suv/minivan monsters that are designed to be everything, and more "just for work trucks" and "just commuting and passenger hauling cars". So, the later will mix very well with low powered hybrid type tech, the former might benefit some, but not as much.

 

Robo-speculation: Complete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had an '07 Prius Touring for about a year before somebody rear-ended it and totaled it. I ended up getting a used Jetta TDI to replace it because the Prius were very hard to get at the time, plus I banked about $12k of the insurance money :) If I could have easily found an exact replacement for my Touring then I would have done it.

 

Anyways, I seriously miss the Prius. Fantastic car. Prius got 40mpg city & highway, Jetta TDI gets 32mpg city, 48mpg highway if driving 60mph, 30mpg highway if driving 80mph (my usual highway speed). I spent more time driving in the city, and up until the last month or so diesel has been more expensive than regular gas so the Prius was cheaper to operate (for awhile it was significantly cheaper). And the Prius had cleaner emissions than the diesel. You can find lots of info at Prius Chat. Be careful, though: when I researched prior to buying the Prius I found that *both* sides of the debate can be misleading and downright full of {censored}. There is a lot of conflicting info and it is hard to know who to believe because you simply get tired of chasing stuff down. It is really funny to compare what is said at Prius Chat to what is said at the TDI Club forums.

 

The only real negative for me was the very cheap interior plastics. Even after a year it still smelled like a new car... it can't be good breathing that {censored} all the time.

 

BTW I love my Jetta TDI as well :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It's really indicative of the entire problem with people in the US. Fundamentally they're idiots who don't actually seek truth.

 

 

Riiiiiigggghhhhhttttt. We also have a monopoly on making butt-ignorant stereotypical a-hole judgments about large groups of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Keep in mind that the Jetta TDI is quite a bit bigger than a Prius.

 

 

You were making an argument about size/mileage but regarding the interior: the Prius actually feels way bigger & roomier than the Jetta TDI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never said i was buying one, did I? I wanted some info because i was curious, that's all.

 

Someone mentioned it before, but at low speeds the prius is silent which is a bit weird, but as soon as the engine kicks in its pretty much a normal car. They did make some interesting design choices though, for example the speedometer is recessed pretty deep into the dashboard at a weird angle. It works once you get used to it though :idk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

And out of all the responses, only two or three people have actually driven/owned a hybrid car.

 

 

Remember the arguments a month back about North American auto companies not making the cars people want to buy like Hybrids?

They are, and no one is buying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

what do you like about it?


how often do you have to charge the battery?


what do you dislike?


just curious

 

 

You do not need to physically charge a battery in a hybrid. The assistance from the combustion motor does that.

 

 

There was an all electric car that could go 300 miles per charge, but GM squelched it.

 

I for one would LOVE an electric car. If GM stuck to that idea they wouldnt be bankrupt now.

 

If you want the engine patent, you need to talk to Chevron. GM sold it to them after they decided to bury the electric car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You were making an argument about size/mileage but regarding the interior: the Prius actually feels way bigger & roomier than the Jetta TDI.

 

Personally I wouldn't read into any of the nonsense I spouted on about today. It was stressful to say the least, and I just popped in, made random posts, and left. We're restructuring 2 departments at work right now, and part of my job is process improvement. :facepalm: I couldn't even remember what I was talking about in between posting. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since they are actually worse for the environment than normal cars (due to the battery manufacturing process), no. Plus most of them don't get better mileage than a Honda Civic and cost a fortune to repair. Biggest scam in the auto industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 


There was an all electric car that could go 300 miles per charge, but GM squelched it.


I for one would LOVE an electric car. If GM stuck to that idea they wouldnt be bankrupt now.


If you want the engine patent, you need to talk to Chevron. GM sold it to them after they decided to bury the electric car.

 

 

Just to clear up this little factoid you've stumbled upon.

 

GM dropped the traditional lithium design for several reasons, including reliability, the technology was expensive to produce and maintain in the real world. That and lithium deposits around the world are currently in the border fences of countries that are less desirable to do business with. Such countries have already made rather insane demands from the offset without even being approached yet.

 

GM instead went ahead with the Hydrogen-powered cell vehicle which worked very well. They haven't "buried" the technology, there is no secret corporate scam aimed at you and yours, last I read, the H2 technology is still there and under research. Hydrogen fuel is far safer, reliable and less expensive than almost any other fuel type being considered!

 

Of course with the recession, every company including GM have had to make changes to survive. If that means shelving off bloated technologies like the lithium power cell, then so be it. If Chevron or whoever you say has it now can do something with it, then all power to them. But the fact remains every company on earth has had to make some sacrifices so it doesn't take a genius to figure that things like their H2 cell isn't quite ready yet.

 

GM has spent billions on alternative fuel technology. Are you saying that if they had spent MORE money on a technology they have yet to earn from, they wouldn't be bankrupt now? Really!? Depsite sales of american muscle cars not showing signs of slowing until the credit crunch?

 

Of course the future of GM will directly impact what happens to this technology. Time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...