Harmony Central Forums
Announcement Announcement Module
Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should I Trade '64 SG Jr for '78 Les Paul Pro

Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse









X
Conversation Detail Module
Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Should I Trade '64 SG Jr for '78 Les Paul Pro

    What do you guys think? I hardly play the SG. When I do pull it out it is a lot of fun but I don't see myself gigging with it. Now the '78 Pro LP with 2 P90's. I think that will really growl! The SG is the one with only 1 P90.

    As far as value (yes I know it is relative to what I think) I think the SG is about $3k - $3.5k and the LP Pro is in the $2k neighborhood.

    What say you guys?
    <div class="signaturecontainer"><b>Guitars:</b> Orig '72 Tele Custom Deluxe (Walnut F Hole 2 Humbucks and a Bigsy, Orig '52 ES125 (Swing it!), '52 RI Butter Tele (#1), Orig '83 Heavy ass Black American Tele (previous #1)&lt;br&gt;<br />
    <b>Amps:</b> '65 BF Super Reverb, '65 BF Deluxe Reverb, BF '65 Princeton Reverb, '68, '69, '73 SF Twins, SF Deluxe Reverb, other silverfaces, JCM 800 2x12 Combo lots of 90's tweed Fender OK stuff</div>

  • #2
    I wouldn't do it
    <div class="signaturecontainer"><font face="System">GREETINGS AND FELICITATIONS, CHILDREN OF TECHNOLOGY!</font></div>

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes.
      <div class="signaturecontainer"><a href="http://www.reverbnation.com/snakeislandarego" target="_blank">http://www.reverbnation.com/snakeislandarego</a></div>

      Comment


      • #4
        Or sell the sg, and buy the les paul
        <div class="signaturecontainer"><a href="http://www.reverbnation.com/snakeislandarego" target="_blank">http://www.reverbnation.com/snakeislandarego</a></div>

        Comment


        • #5
          The Les Paul Professional doesn't have p90s , they're those weird low impedance pickups

          <div class="signaturecontainer"><font face="System">GREETINGS AND FELICITATIONS, CHILDREN OF TECHNOLOGY!</font></div>

          Comment


          • #6
            DONT DO IT

            Comment


            • #7
              The Les Paul Professional doesn't have p90s , they're those weird low impedance pickups



              Ok, thats not it. It may be the Pro deluxe or some animal but it is black and has 2 cream P90s. What is it? Claims to be a 1978
              <div class="signaturecontainer"><b>Guitars:</b> Orig '72 Tele Custom Deluxe (Walnut F Hole 2 Humbucks and a Bigsy, Orig '52 ES125 (Swing it!), '52 RI Butter Tele (#1), Orig '83 Heavy ass Black American Tele (previous #1)&lt;br&gt;<br />
              <b>Amps:</b> '65 BF Super Reverb, '65 BF Deluxe Reverb, BF '65 Princeton Reverb, '68, '69, '73 SF Twins, SF Deluxe Reverb, other silverfaces, JCM 800 2x12 Combo lots of 90's tweed Fender OK stuff</div>

              Comment


              • #8
                Ok, thats not it. It may be the Pro deluxe or some animal but it is black and has 2 cream P90s. What is it? Claims to be a 1978


                Do you have a pic?
                Listen...

                Comment


                • #9
                  I wouldn't do it. The Les Paul Pro, from what I recall, is just another Norlin era take on the LP with P90s. They're decent, but unless you were getting some cash on top, it's a poor trade.
                  <div class="signaturecontainer">-Will<font size="1"><br />
                  <font size="3"><br />
                  <font size="2"><u>Guitars:</u> <b>Suhr Modern, Tom Anderson Drop Top T, Heritage Custom Shop H535 Classic, MANN Les Paul Special (MIJ lawsuit) Ibanez RG7620, Martin 0015M</b><br />
                  <u>Amplification:</u> <b>Bogner Ecstasy 101B/Mesa Boogie Rectifier 2x12 (V30s) Hughes and Kettner TubeMeister 18 combo</b></font></font><br />
                  <br />
                  </font>Obligatory Facebook link:<br />
                  <a href="https://www.facebook.com/KingLoudness" target="_blank">https://www.facebook.com/KingLoudness</a><font size="1"><font size="4"><font size="2"><font face="Lucida Console"><font face="Arial Black"><font face="Century Gothic"><font size="1"><i><b><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"><br />
                  <br />
                  <font size="2"><font size="2">BUY MY ALBUM HERE:<br />
                  </font></font></font></font></b></i></font></font></font></font></font></font></font><a href="http://willhansenguitar.bandcamp.com/" target="_blank">http://willhansenguitar.bandcamp.com/</a></div>

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The later 70s aand early 80s Pros were very decent guitars

                    The Pro had P90s and the Deluxe had mini hbs..

                    Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything. - Plato

                    Comment


                    • rolfman
                      rolfman commented
                      Editing a comment

                      In 1977 bought a 1978 Les Paul Pro that looked exactly like the photo, P90 pups, ebony fretboard, MOP inlay. It was a beauty, but I was frustrated because I could not afford an amp at the time. I traded it later that year for a 1970 Chevelle SS with a 412cu in (rare). However, the rear main seal was shot, so I got the "short end of the stick" on that deal. I rebuilt the engine and had a blast with it. I have seen the 1978 LP Pro sell for $1800-$3000 depening on the condition. They are hard to find.


                  • #11
                    I wouldn't do it. The Les Paul Pro, from what I recall, is just another Norlin era take on the LP with P90s. They're decent, but unless you were getting some cash on top, it's a poor trade.


                    See, now that is complete and I think good advice. My instints tell me that it is not a good trade. Of course if I pick up the LP and it screams take me home...maybe...maybe. But even if I do not play the SG having a 60's piece of history to pass on one of my 3 boys might be worth a whole lot more....

                    I mostly play Tele so the P90 thing really appeals to me.
                    <div class="signaturecontainer"><b>Guitars:</b> Orig '72 Tele Custom Deluxe (Walnut F Hole 2 Humbucks and a Bigsy, Orig '52 ES125 (Swing it!), '52 RI Butter Tele (#1), Orig '83 Heavy ass Black American Tele (previous #1)&lt;br&gt;<br />
                    <b>Amps:</b> '65 BF Super Reverb, '65 BF Deluxe Reverb, BF '65 Princeton Reverb, '68, '69, '73 SF Twins, SF Deluxe Reverb, other silverfaces, JCM 800 2x12 Combo lots of 90's tweed Fender OK stuff</div>

                    Comment


                    • #12
                      The later 70s aand early 80s Pros were very decent guitars

                      The Pro had P90s and the Deluxe had mini hbs..




                      Yeah, looking at it makes me reconsider....lovely isn;t it!! But WORTH a 1964 SG Jr???? Arch, not sure!!!
                      <div class="signaturecontainer"><b>Guitars:</b> Orig '72 Tele Custom Deluxe (Walnut F Hole 2 Humbucks and a Bigsy, Orig '52 ES125 (Swing it!), '52 RI Butter Tele (#1), Orig '83 Heavy ass Black American Tele (previous #1)&lt;br&gt;<br />
                      <b>Amps:</b> '65 BF Super Reverb, '65 BF Deluxe Reverb, BF '65 Princeton Reverb, '68, '69, '73 SF Twins, SF Deluxe Reverb, other silverfaces, JCM 800 2x12 Combo lots of 90's tweed Fender OK stuff</div>

                      Comment


                      • #13
                        Yeah, looking at it makes me reconsider....lovely isn;t it!! But WORTH a 1964 SG Jr???? Arch, not sure!!!


                        Depends entirely on the condition
                        Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything. - Plato

                        Comment


                        • #14
                          If you disregard value, straight up IMO I would prefer the Les Paul.

                          Comment


                          • #15
                            **************** no..

                            Comment



                            Working...
                            X