Jump to content

Why are mixers setup like that?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Mixers have XLR and line inputs, I get that. Mics have one wire plug, guitars use one wire plug, I thought keyboards had one wire plug. Why do mixers have a left and right line channel controlled by one set of knobs? What instruments output to a left AND right channel simultaneously to where it plugs into the left AND right channel on the mixers? I'm not talking about AUX left and right, I get that stereo can be mixed in from something else, but for the normal instrument lines?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Could be a stereo keyboard, lots of players insist on that. Could be a stereo feed for a guitar amp, some amps ARE stereo. Could be used for misc such as a CD player input. Could be used as patch in for another sub-mixer.

Yep. Its nice not to have to burn up two channels in those instances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're still burning up two channels when they make the last 8 channels of a 24 channel board stereo pairs, as with my Yamaha 24/14fx. My thinking is that setup isn't really a 24 channel mixer, but a 20 channel mixer with the last four being stereo.

 

24/14fx Gripe: I don't like that the stereo pairs are all 1/4" and RCA inputs. Other than that, I really like my mixer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Devices that send a stereo signal typically do not have balanced stereo outputs, requiring XLR or balanced TRS connections. So stereo channels don't really need to be two XLR inputs into one channel. If you have gear like that, you are the exception. Mixer companies do not design solely for the exception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I prefer to return my effects sends to a stereo channel on a fader. And that's one reason I like the analog Soundcraft mixers I've got; when it says forty channels it has forty mic pre-amped xlr/line channels and several additional stereo channels on faders. I hate that BS of counting every input as a channel just to pad the channel count in the advertising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I understand. I would just rather have more than 16 mic inputs on my 24 channel mixer. I don't need more than 16 for what I'm doing,
I just think it's odd how the stereo pairs are counted as two channels. They aren't two separate channels. It's a bit misleading.


This is what I'm getting at. Call a cat a cat.

 

 

They're not all "created equal". Example; Soundcrafts' small-format boards, like the EFX series, and MFXi series, actually give you all of the mono/XLR channels that the model names imply. The stereo channels are not included in the count. The EFX-8 for example, has eight XLR/mono channels. The EFX-12 has 12 XLR/mono,,, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Devices that send a stereo signal typically do not have balanced stereo outputs, requiring XLR or balanced TRS connections. ... If you have gear like that, you are the exception. Mixer companies do not design solely for the exception.

 

 

??? Any half-way decent fx processor built in the last several years is going to have balanced stereo outputs.

 

 

I understand. I would just rather have more than 16 mic inputs on my 24 channel mixer. I don't need more than 16 for what I'm doing, I just think it's odd how the stereo pairs are counted as two channels. They aren't two separate channels. It's a bit misleading.


This is what I'm getting at. Call a cat a cat.

 

 

Better consoles don't advertise themselves like this. This phenomenon mainly exists at the lower level of the market.

 

-Dan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Could be a stereo keyboard, lots of players insist on that. Could be a stereo feed for a guitar amp, some amps ARE stereo. Could be used for misc such as a CD player input. Could be used as patch in for another sub-mixer.

 

 

OK, because I want to learn something here, most stereo keyboards I've seen output 2 line signals. How do you get that signal the mixer, often 100 feet from the stage? I would hesitate to run an extra 100 feet of unbalanced line. If I use a stereo 1/4 inch to XLR Y cable at each end I could run it in the snake, but it would still be 2 long unbalanced lines next to each other. If I use a DI box, then it becomes 2 balanced lines, and I don't recall seeing stereo channels having 2 balanced inputs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Use a DI, run the XLR out through the snake. Many console with stereo channels have TRS jacks that are balanced inputs. Come out of the snake as TRS if possible or use an XLR to TRS converter. It will still be a balanced connection throughout. If the console does not use TRS, all bets are off, but many if not most do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So are keyboards the only instrument with stereo outputs? Mixers commonly have MULTIPLE stereo inputs (as part of their normal input count, not the auxillary, etc), How many keyboards at once are they expecting to be played?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

So are keyboards the only instrument with stereo outputs? Mixers commonly have MULTIPLE stereo inputs (as part of their normal input count, not the auxillary, etc), How many keyboards at once are they expecting to be played?

 

 

Some guitar amps have stereo outputs, but all sorts of samplers and electronic instruments do, too.

 

Regardless, these inputs are usually used for outboard fx units and playback devices.

 

-Dan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

You're still burning up two channels when they make the last 8 channels of a 24 channel board stereo pairs, as with my Yamaha 24/14fx. My thinking is that setup isn't really a 24 channel mixer, but a 20 channel mixer with the last four being stereo.


24/14fx Gripe: I don't like that the stereo pairs are all 1/4" and RCA inputs. Other than that, I really like my mixer.

 

 

Yep. I've got the same mixer and the same gripe. It's really not more than a 20 channel mixer as who is going to use the pan knob to "mix" between two channels, and without XLR inputs I'm having to attach transformers or whatnot to the end of the snake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you have playback devices and do much multi-media playback, or do a lot of conference/convention stuff (some of us here do) then stereo inputs like that are really useful. Even with a MUCH larger console, I find that for some shows I use all 4 stereo inputs (8 channels) for stuff like this plus what's coming from the stage.

 

For those of you who think they are useless, you just don't have the breadth of experience on gigs where they are used all the time.

 

I don't care for the way they are numbered on the small consumer/MI boards, but on the bigger pro consoles, each stereo input is seperate and stereo input modules can be swapped for mono input modules for applications where more stereo channels are needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep. I've got the same mixer and the same gripe. It's really not more than a 20 channel mixer as who is going to use the pan knob to "mix" between two channels, and without XLR inputs I'm having to attach transformers or whatnot to the end of the snake.

 

Here's my feeling about it, for what it's worth. My first mixer purchase was in the Nineties in a so called "14 channel mixer," a Soundcraft Folio Rac Pac. Now, as a sound newbie only doing sound for my own bands or having sound men coming in and doing it with their gear, this originally bothered me. I felt that I was sold a 14 channel board that, in reality, has only 12 channels, because the "last four" were really only two. But that was then, this is now. In reality now, I think that most people buying PA gear know, or should know by becoming informed customers, that the BEST thing to do is to count the XLR inputs not the "advertised" channels. With the Internet being so picture oriented these days, particularly now that you can hover a magnifying glass shaped cursor over a lot of advertisements on many sites, this becomes even easier. In short, yeah, it is a little misleading, but I believe that you can still have the full 14 channels if you REALLY want them. By the way, I still use that board, but am going to be upgrading eventually. And I will probably get a 24 channel board with 24 XLR inputs, but that is another conversation. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it's necessarily "misleading". And of course there are applications where a mixer with this configuration would be preferable. For my personal situation, using more than 20 channels on that 24-channel mixer is in "more trouble than its worth" territory. But certainly I imagine it is THE perfect mixer for somebody else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • CMS Author

Here's my feeling about it, for what it's worth. My first mixer purchase was in the Nineties in a so called "14 channel mixer," a Soundcraft Folio Rac Pac. Now, as a sound newbie only doing sound for my own bands or having sound men coming in and doing it with their gear, this originally bothered me. I felt that I was sold a 14 channel board that, in reality, has only 12 channels, because the "last four" were really only two. But that was then, this is now. In reality now, I think that most people buying PA gear know, or should know by becoming informed customers, that the BEST thing to do is to count the XLR inputs not the "advertised" channels. With the Internet being so picture oriented these days, particularly now that you can hover a magnifying glass shaped cursor over a lot of advertisements on many sites, this becomes even easier. In short, yeah, it is a little misleading, but I believe that you can still have the full 14 channels if you REALLY want them. By the way, I still use that board, but am going to be upgrading eventually. And I will probably get a 24 channel board with 24 XLR inputs, but that is another conversation.
:)

 

You got took, sortof, simply because you assumed a few things that weren't necessarily, or universally, true. If you look carefully at a lot of MI grade mixer descriptions, one thing often stands out: they refer to the mixer as having, for instance 24 *inputs*, not 24 *channels*. This is a clue that the mixer won't be 24 channels. You also might have not really considered your actual needs and compared them with the available mixers. As a newbie it's confusing and intimidating to choose a mixer, and you don't know what you don't know.

 

For me, I simply look at the board and count channel faders. That's your channel count. Then look at the oddball channels to see if they have multiple input options...RCA, TR/TRS line, XLR and determine whether I have a need for these features in the quantity offered. Do these channels have HPF's? Direct out? Inserts? Is the EQ truncated to make room in the strip for the other "features"? All of these details can determine whether the board fits a need or doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...