Jump to content

How Early in the Recording Process Do You Overdub Vocals?


Anderton

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Phil brought this up in a different thread, but I think it deserves its own thread...

 

Some producers want to have everything done and ready to go before starting the vocal overdubs, while others want to get vocals on early in the process, so subsequent overdubs can respond appropriately. Vocalists have different preferences as well.

 

The way I work highlights the advantage of being the composer and performer...I'll often put a scratch vocal on very early in the process, maybe when there's only drums and bass, or drums and rhythm guitar. Maybe only rhythm guitar. Then the song takes shape around the vocal - as it should to my way of thinking, because I think the vocal is the most important part of a song.

 

Eventually the song takes real shape, acquires overdubs, a rough mix, etc. At that point I'll re-cut the vocals because the song has a solid identity, but also, it's inspiring to sing against a more complete backdrop.

 

Finally when mixing I'll often add a few tweaks around things that annoy me or don't sound quite right. These are minor, but make a difference.

 

 

Posted

 

The way I work highlights the advantage of being the composer and performer...I'll often put a scratch vocal on very early in the process, maybe when there's only drums and bass, or drums and rhythm guitar. Maybe only rhythm guitar. Then the song takes shape around the vocal - as it should to my way of thinking, because I think the vocal is the most important part of a song.

 

 

Side note / question: Do you feel that when recording the vocals earlier in the process (and building the recording around them) that there's any benefit to taking a similar approach with the mix - starting with the vocal first and then building around that, or do you stick with the more common mix approach of building the mix from the bottom up, starting with the drums, bass and rhythm tracks?

  • Members
Posted

If I start laying down instrumental tracks and put off laying down a strong vocal too long, the instrumentals usually start taking the song to a different place, on a mission of their own.

 

On some occasions, pretty rare ones, it turns out ok to let the instrumental side take charge. But as a rule, it complicates the process and at the worst, the song gets bogged down as I try to re-integrate vocals into an altered background. Sometimes when this happens I have to wipe the board clean and admit I've written two songs here, not one.

 

What I've been doing for a few months is rather new for me - I work up a four or five-piece basic instrumental "band" (it's all me actually) and lay down pretty basic, simple, scratch versions of those instruments, defining the groove carefully in the process. Then I put down a pretty strong vocal (not just a place-holder) and proceed to work up and flesh out the details of give and take between the vocal and the other instruments.

 

Vocals can mess up a great rhythmic vibe that the instruments are grooving on. So sometimes I'll alter the vocal to stay in sync with and not obscure the groove. I take lots of cues on how to do this from old soul music, where the call-and-response is second nature. Rhythm is so key to everything. Such as......

 

[YOUTUBE]uMimqfJVedE[/YOUTUBE]

 

nat whilk ii

  • Members
Posted

An interesting aspect to consider is how the entire process has changed in the last twenty years with the ability for nearly limitless tracks at your disposal. Back in the old 4 track cassette days you practically had to get all the instrumentation down first so the vocals didn't get drowned out.

The luxury of so many tracks has changed the entire process. You can lay down as few or many tracks as you need, and do the vocals at any time in the process. The last thing I sang on I layed down the vocal with just sparse instrumentation, and layers of stuff went in after that.

Digital recording changed everything...Except for what leads us to create to begin with...The Muse.

 

  • Members
Posted

 

Side note / question: Do you feel that when recording the vocals earlier in the process (and building the recording around them) that there's any benefit to taking a similar approach with the mix - starting with the vocal first and then building around that, or do you stick with the more common mix approach of building the mix from the bottom up, starting with the drums, bass and rhythm tracks?

 

I do rough mixes along the way so when the overdubs are done, I'm close to what I want.

 

But then I indeed work first on the voice. That usually involves "mixing via DSP" where I destructively edit the vocal for a uniform level; that way I don't have to add a lot of compression (although I often do add quite a bit of limiting.

 

Then I get the rhythm section solid. Once the vocals, drums, and bass are in place, the rest is just decoration :)

 

The final step is applying "DJ thinking" to selectively remove anything that's not necessary at a given point in the song. When I finally post the finished/mastered version of my songs, you'll hear that quite a few bits and pieces are missing...including an entire verse in one case.

  • Members
Posted
Phil brought this up in a different thread, but I think it deserves its own thread...

 

Some producers want to have everything done and ready to go before starting the vocal overdubs, while others want to get vocals on early in the process, so subsequent overdubs can respond appropriately. Vocalists have different preferences as well.

 

The way I work highlights the advantage of being the composer and performer...I'll often put a scratch vocal on very early in the process, maybe when there's only drums and bass, or drums and rhythm guitar. Maybe only rhythm guitar. Then the song takes shape around the vocal - as it should to my way of thinking, because I think the vocal is the most important part of a song.

 

Eventually the song takes real shape, acquires overdubs, a rough mix, etc. At that point I'll re-cut the vocals because the song has a solid identity, but also, it's inspiring to sing against a more complete backdrop.

 

Finally when mixing I'll often add a few tweaks around things that annoy me or don't sound quite right. These are minor, but make a difference.

 

 

I do it exactly this way. I love having a decent scratch vocal early on to shape the song.

 

I tend to mix as I go, sometimes somewhat haphazardly, but always moving forward.

 

  • CMS Author
Posted

Vocal overdubs? Well, maybe one, if you have only one singer and you want a harmony part. Unless you're recording an instrumental, how do the players know how to play the notes without a vocal to tell them how the song really goes? But then, I don't record a song without the banjo or the fiddle and then add it later as an overdub.

 

There are certainly different ways of recording and different things that get recorded. A lot of music today is really instrumental, with a vocal being one more instrument that gets its place planned in advance. It's not the focus of the recording, and can usually be worked into the record-one-instrument-at-a-time process successfully. That's not what I do,

 

A question that might have more meaningful answers, at least to me, is why leave the vocal as the last thing that gets recorded? If there's a plan, that's usually it. They don't plan to record the organ last, if it isn't part of the basic tracks, they record the organ when someone says 'Hey, an organ would sound good here,"

  • Members
Posted

The vocal is a road map. This is why it exists in some capacity while shaping, creating, etc. the song. Especially in studios such as mine where one is using the recording studio as another instrument.

  • Members
Posted

 

I do it exactly this way. I love having a decent scratch vocal early on to shape the song.

 

I'd love to have a decent scratch vocal too. Unfortunately, mine usually suck :) But they're good enough to provide the "road map" to which you alluded.

 

  • Members
Posted

Ha! Well, we take what we can get! :D

 

But seriously, a "decent" scratch vocal might mean that it gives you the melody, timing, phrasing, and mood, while not being perfect by any stretch (and quite frankly, the "perfection" thing in vocals or most anything else in music is grossly overrated anyway).

  • Members
Posted

...and quite frankly, the "perfection" thing in vocals or most anything else in music is grossly overrated anyway).

 

Amen! That is one of the things about a truly "live" concert - there are mistakes - some small, some not so small. Last weekend up in Gettysburg we saw the Seldom Scene, and Dudley Conell (who has been with the Seldom Scene over 20 years now) started one of the songs with the capo in the wrong slot. They stopped, had a good laugh, and then played their heart out. So yes, perfection is grossly overrated!

 

 

  • Members
Posted

I think it's not just about imperfection for imperfection's sake; I could do that all day long :) But if music is about tension and release...perfection does not create tension.

  • Members
Posted
I think it's not just about imperfection for imperfection's sake; I could do that all day long :) But if music is about tension and release...perfection does not create tension.

 

Yes. That and true perfection is unnatural because it is impossible for humans to achieve.

 

Imperfect as in "bad" or even "I could do that better"? That's another story.

 

But anyway, a good scratch vocal can really serve as a great guide. It'll have some of the emotional statement, the general feel, the lyrics, the placement, the time, the whole bit to serve as a "road map" for everyone else. And that's really what is valuable.

  • Members
Posted

 

Yes. That and true perfection is unnatural because it is impossible for humans to achieve.

 

But I often like unnatural - the aural equivalent of CGI. In a lot of the music I'm doing, I try for "idealized" sounds, like ultra-smooth guitar distortion, or sampled bass played from keyboard instead of playing bass. And that extends to vocals, but it's more about the tone than the performance. Ultimately I think what the ear craves is a combination of variation and predictability.

 

I'll give an example on a vocal I was doing last night, and applying Melodyne. The vocal had a lot of pitch variations, slides etc. It was interesting to move the "center" pitch around so it was perfect, but leave all the slides and nuances in place. It produced an interesting combination of "perfection" while retaining the human elements that make the voice interesting. With respect to the OP, these changes don't imply any need to change any other instrumental parts.

 

Also with respect to overdubs, I may have mentioned this before but it bears repeating...I had done a few vocal overdubs in the chorus for a cover of "We Gotta Get Out of this Place." On playback, it didn't sound quite right, so I thought maybe the pitch needed fixing. But when I looked at the notes in Melodyne, they were right on pitch. I checked the pitch of the backing instruments and everything was fine there as well. Ultimately, I ended up using Melodyne to de-correct the pitch of two of the three vocals. This may seem weird, but there's precedent: Consider a synth's unison mode, where you have multiple voices playing at once. You almost always apply some degree of detuning to "fatten" the sound.

 

  • Members
Posted

Now regarding a different aspect of vocal overdubs: Do you listen to the vocal in the headphones, leave one headphone off, leave one headphone off but don't have vocals in the phones, or...?

  • Members
Posted

I rarely do vocals, but most of the time, I listen to the vocal in the headphones personally, and most of the people who record here seem to like to do that as well, but I do have some that occasionally leave one ear off.

  • Members
Posted

Interesting. I find that I can't sing unless I'm hearing my actual voice through the air. As soon as I try to hear it only through headphones, it just doesn't work for me. The performance suffers, and often the pitch as well. If I didn't have to worry about leakage, my preferred scenario would be hearing the music on speakers, and singing to that.

  • Members
Posted

I would prefer to do that, but I don't seem to have any pitch problems with headphones, for whatever reason. Do bear in mind I'm not a singer at all, but it seems to work. But yes, I would prefer speakers. I had that set up before, but it's a house, and the hassle factor is high. I had speakers, and reversed the phase on one of them like lots of people do, but I don't record nearly as much any more, and the headphones work fine. They're open headphones anyway, which probably helps. I know when my girlfriend sings, she takes one ear off.

  • Members
Posted

I always start with a scratch vocal + instruments if it's an already written song. The vocal is a crucial centerpiece, and everything needs to be there to support it.

On the other hand, if composing while recording, the lyrics and vocal melody might often be written to mesh with how the arrangement evolved. I'd say only 5% of my recordings work that way, though. It's better to tell the story, then add the accompaniment.

  • Members
Posted

As far as singing with headphones: If the vocal is burned into my DNA, I can sing it with or without vox in the (headphone) monitor mix. If not, I know I need to practice the part more till I can sing it with confidence and conviction.

I have, a few times, sung while listening to monitor speakers, but try not to do that because I don't want unintended flamming or phasing issues from the backing tracks leaking into my mic to mess up an otherwise great take.

  • Members
Posted

I mostly just record myself doing all the parts. Normally I'll record piano first (while listening to a drum machine) as that is my primary instrument. Next vocals, then drums and bass (sometimes drums first, sometimes bass first), then rhythm guitar, then lead guitar, then harmony vocals (if the song requires them). Then if there's some other lead instrument I'll add that last using a synthesizer. Sometimes I'll redo the vocal after all the other tracks are done, but not often. If the song doesn't require piano, I'll take it out when mixing but it's always the first track I record.

  • Members
Posted
Now regarding a different aspect of vocal overdubs: Do you listen to the vocal in the headphones' date=' leave one headphone off, leave one headphone off but don't have vocals in the phones, or...?[/quote']

 

 

I leave one headphone off and don't have the vocals in the phones as my most comfortable option. Seems to help with vocal control for some reason I don't really understand.

 

Although, if I'm putting down harmony parts, I sometimes just wear both phones and have all the vocals cranked in the phones.

 

nat whilk ii

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...