Jump to content

If Barack Obama was an effects pedal, what would he be and why?


Tengo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 189
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Lets see... if I've kept proper track that would make him a secret muslim fanatical christian socialist commie community organizer.


AND HES BLACK!!


We're all gonna die.

 

 

Well, I don't know about all that other stuff, but he's definitely 50% black, and 100% socialist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would say he's the confidence booster, personally.

Well, I don't know about all that other stuff, but he's definitely 50% black, and 100% socialist.



What exactly are you basing this on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

socialist.

 

Ok but wait--is he a secret socialist? because if we're actually to take this literally it'd mean we'd have a completely different form of government right now, and we don't. we have the same government we've had as long as this country has existed. just going through some financial twists and turns.

 

I guess this is where we get into "FDR was a socialist too!" territory, which is where I stop arguing and come back to reality, the actual truthful historic reality where FDR did the nation more good than perhaps any other president of his century.

 

:bor:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Socialism


1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods



please


its a fair accusation

 

 

So, do you also view banks as socialist organizations because they lend money to people?

 

If Obama were advocating socialism, he would be proposing that the government own all industry and capital. In fact, I haven't heard him propose that the government own any industries and he's, in fact, arguing against a lot of experts who believe that socializing the banks would be for the best, so...

 

Also, if anyone cites taxes as their reason, they must have forgotten the way taxes were only one presidency ago or have been ok with having lived in a socialist country back in the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Socialism


1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods



please


its a fair accusation

 

 

Correct me if I'm wrong but the first bank bailout occurred before Obama took his oath. So, isn't it safe to say our country was already headed towards Socialism?

 

One more thing, what about failing companies being allowed to merge? Isn't that technically Socialism? That has been going on for decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ok but wait--is he a
secret
socialist? because if we're actually to take this literally it'd mean we'd have a completely different form of government right now, and we don't. we have the same government we've had as long as this country has existed. just going through some financial twists and turns.


I guess this is where we get into "FDR was a socialist too!" territory, which is where I stop arguing and come back to reality, the actual truthful historic reality where FDR did the nation more good than perhaps any other president of his century.


:bor:

 

sorry but fdr was crap

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla...px?RelNum=5409

 

ww2 got us out of the depression

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Socialism


1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods



please


its a fair accusation

 

 

so lets say the financial meltdown never happened. the economy is doing great. do you think Obama would go in and put in socialistic practices? Yeah, about as soon as hell froze over.

 

What we're dealing with means actions need to be taken--if its some governmental intervention to help stop a total collapse of the world's economy, well, you gotta do what you gotta do. Its not socialism and its dishonest to call it that--these are a set of circumstances which call for very specific actions. To come in with broad accusations of a larger political view, or entire governmental philosophy is just misguided and wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Correct me if I'm wrong but the first bank bailout occurred before Obama took his oath. So, isn't it safe to say our country was already headed towards Socialism?

 

 

i think so

 

i was against the bail outs

and if i'm not mistaken, those were mainly insurance company bailouts.

 

i'm a

'lets get the earthquake over with' guy

 

the greedy bastards that caused this should be out of business by the principles of the free market and {censored} the nea too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

sorry but fdr was crap


ww2 got us out of the depression

 

 

Hmm, you mean a time period when America had it's highest tax rates ever and involved tons of infrastructure spending resulted in economic prosperity? Well, I never!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm with NW here. You don't go around messing with stuff if it's working great. Why would Obama go and make unnecessary problems for himself? Please...

 

 

precisely,

he wouldn't.

 

but he's not creating problems for himself.

 

he is nationalizing banks, and private industry,

printing money and funding to the tune of billions of dollars

union thugs and and hack political organizations like Acorn

in order to:

 

Amass Government power and control.

 

 

This is not a creating problems for him

this is politics 101

 

i am simply saying that the charge of socialism is not crazy or unfounded

but a legitimate question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

precisely,

he wouldn't.


but he's not creating problems for himself.


he is nationalizing banks, and private industry,

printing money and funding to the tune of billions of dollars

union thugs and and hack political organizations like Acorn

in order to:


Amass Government power and control.



This is not a creating problems for him

this is politics 101


i am simply saying that the charge of socialism is not crazy or unfounded

but a legitimate question

 

 

So, which bank has he nationalized?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...