Jump to content

What has happened to the US ??


favata5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 538
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Originally posted by 17 Tubes




It's a good point.




Doesn't mean Romanian can't rough him up a bit, if he's willing to pay his own price for it.



LOL! No he is right. It is the flag-burner's flag too. I just don't understand why someone would want to do that.

You want to protest, burn a North Korean flag. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Originally posted by rgf



Your arguing style is unique.


No it's not. It's pretty common to anyone familiar with the concepts of logic and writing an agumentative essay. I will admit I do tend to mix things up now and then though. I don't have a great memory and not exactly putting a lot of effort into what I write here. ;) But that's execution, not style....

You make untrue statements like "Your argument up to that point proclaimed that you knew for absolute fact what was best for mankind" and then make judgements based on the untruths.
:freak:


I know I make mistakes, but I don't believe the statement you sighted to be untrue. After all, you're the one who said, "men marrying men isn't helping [to ensure the survival of the species]." That sounds to me like the proclomation I accused you of, after all, how can you know that unless you know what is best for mankind?

So while you didn't make the statement explicitly, you did implicitly.

What I find interesting is how you have totally sidestepped the analogy by just saying 'it's wrong', and then provide no thoughtful counter points to it.


I didn't say it's wrong. I said you haven't set up any basis for it nor shown how it connects to your assertion that gay marriage is wrong. (see my next point below)


I put the analogy out there for discussion. If you can't refute it, then too bad.



this is your problem: I don't give a rats ass about refuting your analogy. As I said in my first reply to you, I'm not trying to argue for gay marriage or refute your agrument. You basically said if you follow the "logic", gay marriage is wrong and I pointed out that there was no logic in your argument. I simply want you to reveal the logic you referred to but you seem incappable of doing that. Don't feel bad, you're not alone.

The 'slippery slope' is wrong?? Thanks for letting me in on that little nugget of wisdom.


You're welcome. Hopefully you'll avoid it in the future now that you know better.



I love you guys...
:cry:
..all of you...
:cry:
...even though I don't know any of you;)


Don't tell me you want to get married.... :freak:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Originally posted by Romanian Reaper



LOL! No he is right. It is the flag-burner's flag too. I just don't understand why someone would want to do that.


You want to protest, burn a North Korean flag.
:)

Just placed order for one North Korean flag and optional lighter fluid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally, I think people should have the right to burn the flag. Having said that, I find it offensive and disrespectful, but don't think it needs to be legislated, there are much more important things to put under a microscope in our country now. All of this is just another ploy for the republicans to get their constituents to the polls, just like gay marriage was last time around. I wish the left had hot-button topics like that to mass their electorate, but a constitutional amendment to outlaw being a redneck just won't fly, and would disenfranchise most of an entire political party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Originally posted by kush06

Personally, I think people should have the right to burn the flag. Having said that, I find it offensive and disrespectful, but don't think it needs to be legislated, there are much more important things to put under a microscope in our country now. All of this is just another ploy for the republicans to get their constituents to the polls, just like gay marriage was last time around. I wish the left had hot-button topics like that to mass their electorate, but a constitutional amendment to outlaw being a redneck just won't fly, and would disenfranchise most of an entire political party.



I bet you're the kind of guy that gets aroused when looking at pictures of nude cows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Originally posted by fragglerick


I predict that by page 8 there will be conversations about amps.





So I am ordering a Peters Custom Dual Channel it looks like.


I think it will bring me back to a headier time, when White Males roamed all powerful in packs being catered to by their women and the Darkies, and the towelheads sent us all the oil we could drink!


Good times.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Originally posted by -=MYK=-



I haven't got any. I was really hoping that you did.



Nope, you're thinking of rgf. Me, being the crazy left winger I am, only have porn with naked tree huggers. On recycled paper and dvd's, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...