Jump to content

There really needs to be an Axe-FX Lite


xautumnsashesx

Recommended Posts

  • Members

what percentage of axe fx's are purchased by actual gigging musicians, though? i'd say less than half.


since it's already been ported to a PC, all they have to spend money on is packaging and burning discs. the profit margin would be significantly higher ( i assume ) than the hardware units, and they could better serve their customers. i don't see how it's not a win/win solution. and at a price point of $500, that's still what i consider high end for software.
:idk:

but i don't have a dog in the race, so no biggy to me
:idk:

 

You have PC software, and it'll get bootlegged with a quickness. Keeping it in a piece of physical hardware is a pretty good way to prevent that; that'd be my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

You have PC software, and it'll get bootlegged with a quickness. Keeping it in a piece of physical hardware is a pretty good way to prevent that; that'd be my guess.

 

Yes -- the hardware is the dongle in this case.

 

Plus they can make money on the HW and having control of the run time environment goes a long way to ensuring that the SW operates correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes -- the hardware is the dongle in this case.


Plus they can make money on the HW and having control of the run time environment goes a long way to ensuring that the SW operates correctly.

 

 

I have seen software dongle emulators before with Steinberg Cubase cracked software..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I have seen software dongle emulators before with Steinberg Cubase cracked software..

 

Doesn't that reinforce the point that selling only the software may actually reduce Fractal's profits due to theft? There are a lot comments here about how much more money fractal could make selling only the software. I suspect that the hardware serves several purposes: security and a consistent HW environment for the SW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Latency is also extremely low on the Axe-Fx. Far lower than you could ever get on the PC. And like I said, a laptop even with a Core i5/i7 probably would barely run it since the laptop chips are not as fast as their desktop counterparts.

 

It seems they have the units flying off shelves as they are so they have zero incentive to release anything cheaper. For what it is (amp simulator with top shelf effects) the Axe-Fx is not really expensive. You can easily spend as much or even more on an Eventide or Lexicon processor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Latency is also extremely low on the Axe-Fx. Far lower than you could ever get on the PC. And like I said, a laptop even with a Core i5/i7 probably would barely run it since the laptop chips are not as fast as their desktop counterparts.


It seems they have the units flying off shelves as they are so they have zero incentive to release anything cheaper. For what it is (amp simulator with top shelf effects) the Axe-Fx is not really expensive. You can easily spend as much or even more on an Eventide or Lexicon processor.

 

 

It's a great product, worth what they are charging. For my use, and what I can tell, other peoples as well, even the standard version has way more futures than many players will utilize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The problem is that one of the keys to the Axe is the bitchin' DSP which adds a *ton* to the final cost of the unit (this info is from Cliff/Fractal). If those awesome models' minimal CPU requirement cannot be met by a cheaper CPU that the code can be easily ported to there's no way to mitigate that cost and still meet the existing quality standard. Also, the rest of the Axe's hardware is pretty premium stuff which comes into play in not only the cost but the sound of the unit. So, if none of the stuff they could cut provides a significant savings it's just not profitable for the manufacturer.

So, basically, quality costs. Go figure. That thing is a beast and a hellacious value as is, so man up and save some money for it. We're just conditioned to prices on technology dropping like a rock these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Axe FX Lite -- you get all of the amp models and effects of the Ultra, but you are not able to load your own cabinet impulses, and instead have to use Klops drums ones.



20 bucks.

 

 

Bwaaaaaaahhhhhhahahahahahaaa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

the simple solution is to release it as software that you use on your PC...


they could sell it for $500, and probably make more than they do selling the hardware.

 

 

Cliff is too busy worrying about who might steal his software to do something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cliff is pretty protective of it, hence why (IIRC) there is no direct line into the Virtual Power Amp section (the thing he seems to be most protective of) i.e. a power amp in which actually would have been cool and really useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lots of good points already about how/why it wouldn't cost much less at all when cutting features.

 

OP, you could also look at it like this. Just like others have said, you'd have to start cutting components and operating power to cut features and cost, and then it wouldn't be nearly the same product. Kind of like a Bogner Alchemist isn't really 'almost' like one of Reinhold's high priced Bogners.

 

I'm not sure how many Alchemists are flying off the sales floors, but I imagine it isn't a ton, and those peeps probably don't think they got a "stripped down" high quality Bogner at a bargain price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

if i remember correctly there releasing a unit that has just the effects sometime this year

 

Can't remember if Cliff actually said that, or if he only said they were working on something new but that it wasn't going to directly compete with their existing products.

 

 

I hardly use FX in my Axe-FX, mostly just amp and cab stuff... maybe a bit of EQ and delay. I still think it's well worth the money, and all that other stuff is there if I do decide I want to piss about with it. :idk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Can't remember if Cliff actually said that, or if he only said they were working on something new but that it wasn't going to directly compete with their existing products.



I hardly use FX in my Axe-FX, mostly just amp and cab stuff... maybe a bit of EQ and delay. I still think it's well worth the money, and all that other stuff is there if I do decide I want to piss about with it.
:idk:

 

for people like me who love there amp and cab setup right now a effects model would be perfect, especially if it could do channel switching on your amp as well!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...