Members Zeppelin Rules Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Although it's extremely distasteful I think that if he's not using her likeness on his billboard it ought to be allowed. Now why you would want your likeness on a billboard bitching about abortion is completely beyond me. I'm also curious as to his motives. Is he against abortion or just her getting one. I think it makes a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gt_jumper Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ke2 Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Same with her taking pills. If "getting pregnant" is out of the question for a man, he should always wrap up.Forgot the pill, secretly wanted to get pregnant..... Don't trust anyone else to take care of your interests. Things don't just "work themselves out". Someone works them out on some level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DISTORT6 Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 2 out of 3 holes won't get her pregnant. Choose smartly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members -Assy- Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Same with her taking pills. woman on pill + me pulling out and splooging man-magma on parts of her body has always been an entertaining and well-insured way of birth control for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members duncan Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 first page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Murdoch Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 I like how the dude assumed it was his enough to take out a billboard. This. I can't even BEGIN to tell you how many Bob Smith Jrs that are running around that aren't REALLY Bob Smith Jr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Murdoch Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 2 out of 3 holes won't get her pregnant. Choose smartly. This is a great first post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Elemenope Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 2 out of 3 holes won't get her pregnant. Choose smartly. Damn you signed up for HCAF just to post that? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NixerX Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110606/ap_on_re_us/us_abortion_billboard So a woman can have an abortion without the mans approval...but if the man wants her to have an abortion and she doesn't...he STILL has to pay child support? Something doesn't seem right with that. This should end well... Yes its called lack of contraception. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members shredhead7 Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members shredhead7 Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members oryan Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Hey, if he eats the cream pie shouldn't he get the door prize? nasty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ~Abstract~ Posted June 7, 2011 Author Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Yes its called lack of contraception. Name a circumstance where a man can get a judge to force a woman to pay for something, for him, which she didn't want in the first place? Because that's the circumstance we have right now if you substitute genders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DISTORT6 Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Damn you signed up for HCAF just to post that? lol Nah. Been lurking here for awhile. I'm a quality not quantity kinda guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members madryan Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 Nah. Been lurking here for awhile. I'm a quality not quantity kinda guy. you're clearly in the wrong place lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DISTORT6 Posted June 7, 2011 Members Share Posted June 7, 2011 you're clearly in the wrong place lol HAHAHA!!! As pathetic as it is, I think I fit in here better than the bluezack covered TGP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members robert 225 Posted February 6, 2013 Members Share Posted February 6, 2013 this is really too much..... after read this i must say that every thing is posible now a days, the billboard maker is not responsible for all of these, because the persone who want these type of billboards are actually responsible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Miter Gauge Posted February 6, 2013 Members Share Posted February 6, 2013 madryan wrote: In all seriousness, my kid is the most important thing in my life. My ex wife was at one point thinking of aborting him and despite the fact that legally I had zero right as the father of the forthcoming baby and her husband to stop her I pretty much told her I'd better never see her again if she did. I'm not naive like the rabid anti-abortion crowd. Lots of kids that get aborted would be totally {censored}ed if they were allowed to be born. But... Lots of kids never get the chance because it's become a relatively "easy" thing to just dispose of your unborn baby, much as you would a dog or cat. It's barbaric any way you look at it. Maybe after the places I've been and the things I've seen I place a higher value on life than your average spoiled f-ing rotten westerner. I seem to recall you saying you'd killed people before, am I wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Belva Posted February 7, 2013 Members Share Posted February 7, 2013 ~Abstract~ wrote: Exactly. Kinda like the stoopid woman who got rid of her diaphragm when she heard her boyfriend bought a condominium. So why does the man have to pay for the kid while the woman gets to keep it? If she didn't want the kid, she could have used protection...or just not had sex. It's a very sexist conundrum.Sexism when it comes to children is, was and always wil favor the mother. I think this guy has a point. I couldn't help but notice though that the guy's name is (John) Holmes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.