Jump to content

War.......... Why?


Beck

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This may sound idealistic but what if the currency was Love - and wealth was not measured by how much you have but how much you give. When you think about that - at the end of your life that is really what matters.

 

When George Harrison died in 2001, the top news headlines about terrorism and collateral damage were replaced for that one day with Hari singing "Give Me Love Give Me Peace On Earth"

 

During the Live8 connects, I noticed the huge crowds of people that had turned up all over the world to support the cause - helping people in a destitute part of the world by sharing a bit of our wealth. When Bob Geldof was leading his march to the G8 summit in Edinburgh it was the top item in the news - then there were the London subway bombings and Live8 was no longer on the radar.

 

Were the subway bombings designed to derail the momentum of Live8 or was it just a co-incidence?

 

Was George Harrison trying to send us a message from the other side?

 

Are we just a bunch of greedy assholes trying to rape and pillage the earth - at the expense of true human values - for something as temporary as a big bank account?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Miscellaneous thoughts:

 

People must like war because they keep finding new reasons to have one.

 

I call it the "traditional population control method," because people often choose it over the many other new options.

 

As long as people think that fighting wars is better than the possibility of losing, the wars will continue.

 

How often is losing a political conflict really worse than being in a war?

 

We will keep bombing them until they stop hating us.

 

We all choose whether to participate in wars. The old cliche was "What if they held a war, and nobody came?"

 

I don't support the troops. I feel sorry for them and I don't wish them any harm, but I think they are stupid for joining the military. Sorry, its true. Without willing young men could we even have wars?

 

War is most loved by older men who start them and the young men who fight them. Would the old men start so many wars if they had to fight them themselves?

 

War is healthy for corporations and other growing concerns. (no matter who wins)

 

I am convinced that young men have a strong desire to be in dangerous situations. That is helpful when you need to send them out into the woods to hunt a bear so the tribe can eat. Now it leads to war, bad driving and gang fights.

 

We deserve the politicians and the wars that we accept. My main concern at this point is for the animals and plants who were never given a vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In no particular order and yuo can look them up

 

Thirty Years War,

Seven Years War,

The War for Jenkins ear,

The Great Northern War,

The War of the Austrian Succession

The War of the Spanish Succession

The War of Devolution

The Hundred Years War,

The War of the Roses

Roman Civil Wars

The Roman Jewish Wars

The Peloponesian War (This one is a classic and has meaning for NOW)

The Crusades

The Mongol Invasions

Many Byzantine wars (Too many to have names)

The Muslim Expansion

The Boer War

The Napoleonic Wars

The American Revolution

The Wars against the French Republic

The Greco Persian War

The Franco Prussian War

 

I am only getting started and yet I have not mentioned a single conflict that began in the 20th century or the 21st century. It not new. Its not necessarily greed. Its us. Stop war? Change human nature. Seventy percent of Americans supported the invasion of Iraq for reasons of their own. You can say they were manipulated you can say whatever you want but they were okay with it when it began. That makes war possible. We can believe that are good reasons to do it and so we do. I'd have continued the list but I have a conference call to get on....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The beginning of the movie 2001 a Space oddity summed it up nicely;

Humans compete for diminishing resources, regardless of what those resources might be.

 

h_in_2001_monolith_03.jpg

 

 

 

The suggestion here is that man has always been dependent on his weapons, whether they be bones or spaceships.

 

 

 

h_in_2001_hal_03.jpg

 

It was Kubrick, after all, who envisioned us reaching a higher state of consciousness at the dawn of the new millennium. Yet the best we've been able to come up with is the ability to download porn and buy stuff over the Internet -- a cyberspace odyssey.

 

 

http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/movies/2001_space_oddity_991216.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:cop:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its us. Stop war? Change human nature.

 

 

It has something to do with (drumroll, please) YOUR BALLS, GUYS.

 

testicle.gif

 

 

Testosterone is the drug that, with adrenaline, encourages a man to either fight, flee or f**k. These are what men like to do, the world over. (It's the drug of sexual desire in Women, too, but that's another story.)

 

In college, we used to inject male mice with mousey testosterone... put 'em in a Skinner box (limited space, limited resources) then watch 'em stand up like kangaroos and "spar" with each other.

 

The more testosterone they received--- you guessed it--- the more fighting they did. Sort of mousey Rock 'Em-Sock 'Em Robots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
It has something to do with (drumroll, please) YOUR BALLS, GUYS.

 

testicle.gif

 

 

 

In college, we used to inject male mice with mousey testosterone... put 'em in a Skinner box (limited space, limited resources) then watch 'em stand up like kangaroos and "spar" with each other.

 

A mouse dick 'sword fight?; sounds like a new Realty Show...just to hazard a guess...did Mighty Mouse win?:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It has something to do with (drumroll, please) YOUR BALLS, GUYS.





 

 

actually - I heard the other day that they've found that a group of males with high testosterone are more passive than lone males with high testosterone. Apparently it acts as a pacifier when there are many males involved in a group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

When I used to ride my bicycle everywhere (thus sparing world resources), women wanted to have me - for a night or three.


When I got my BMW, women wanted to have me - for a husband.

 

Trouble is, many of them are still having the night or three with the young bicyclists also.... :o

 

Personally, I suspect the first war started when some long dead cavewoman refused sex because the neighbor's cave was nicer, leading to her mate taking said cave by force. :idk:

 

Terry D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

huh I always just told them I ate {censored}. can't rid of them after that either.

 

There's a reason for that.


When I used to ride my bicycle everywhere (thus sparing world resources), women wanted to have me - for a night or three.


When I got my BMW, women wanted to have me - for a husband.


It remains true of our species that the mating - social status game looks to
displays of power and wealth
. Just like peacocks we human males have to strut our plumes.


It sucks. Nonetheless, it is the biggest driver of materialism. Let's face it - before you got out into the mating world, wasn't a bicycle good enough?
:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It has something to do with (drumroll, please) YOUR BALLS, GUYS.


testicle.gif

Testosterone is the drug that, with adrenaline, encourages a man to either fight, flee or f**k. These are what men like to do, the world over. (It's the drug of sexual desire in Women, too, but that's another story.)

 

Speaking of balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Like the Palestinian girl I alluded to while talking to Rudolf in another thread. Now that was a most bizarre encounter. She was an exchange student that I just happened to pass on the street on campus one night. She was standing by her car, which was blocked in by the cars in front and behind, so she couldn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally I think the source of most human problems is overpopulation, which today has reached the point that there's literally nowhere else to go, & we're all quickly reaching critical mass.

Overpopulation's not new, of course, nor the only "cause" of conflict & in itself may be part of the long-standing effort of some ruling classes to keep people distracted with interpersonal competitiveness instead of developing cooperation.

 

However, it's also true that, like "racism", xenophobia & other thinking problems war probably goes back to something innate in the brain or mind that develops or can be exploited.

It can be observed in other animals, most notably our cousin apes.

 

It may not need a real "reason" at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...