Members KjStrat62 Posted August 21, 2007 Members Share Posted August 21, 2007 Pick between these 2 guitars. Both are really nice. *Fender 52 Relic Gene Baker Telecaster.Relic job . Action sweet. Vintage tele sounds with Seymour Duncan pups* Gibson Les Paul Vintage Mahogany. Cherry worn. Action on this one is really low. Burstbuckers pups Having a hard time deciding which one to go with. You pick!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members OldCrankyDouche Posted August 21, 2007 Members Share Posted August 21, 2007 Paul. Not that I have ANY experience with Fenders AT ALL. "Really low"? Like too low for your taste? Then adjust the rod... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SpectralJulian Posted August 21, 2007 Members Share Posted August 21, 2007 Go with what you feel on any given night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeuceII Posted August 21, 2007 Members Share Posted August 21, 2007 Telecaster. But I'm admittedly not the biggest Les Paul fan, and enjoy almost every American Fender I pick up. Pics would help, though, just in case the relic is overdone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KjStrat62 Posted August 21, 2007 Author Members Share Posted August 21, 2007 Paul. Not that I have ANY experience with Fenders AT ALL."Really low"? Like too low for your taste? Then adjust the rod... Low as in the way I like it. Put 11's on it.No tuning issues at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Tribute2Johnny Posted August 21, 2007 Members Share Posted August 21, 2007 tele Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Turd Furgison Posted August 21, 2007 Members Share Posted August 21, 2007 I would begrudgingly choose the tele...but i would rather an sg w. p-90's pauls are too muddy and too heavy for my tastes:blah: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members kishjor Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 tele of course! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 IMO, that's a better example of a good Tele than a good Les Paul. IMO, Tele ftw. :phil: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members StratStevo Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 Apples and oranges...you need both! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members donnievaz Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 Tele - Higher resale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members slash81291 Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 LP ousts Tele in all instances. let the flaming begin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Goominim Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 Tele but I hate faux finishes. So pretentious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DaSkip Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 By your sig, it looks like you own both of them. The low action is totally adjustable, so that means nothing. What does mean something is which guitar do you prefer. You have two very different guitars and they both sound and play differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members HMCMedic Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 This month I'd choose the Gibson:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NITEFLY182 Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 The tele. More comfortable to play and if Im not getting 24 frets, I guess the 21 on the tele over the 22 on the LP wont kill me. Teles just sound more alive and vintage mahogany LPs are essentially the "mommy buy me" version that totally blows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Keith SIO Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 les paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members homestar_kevin Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 tele pending pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 Good point Kevin - this thread is worthless without pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Joranges Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 What Phil and Nitefly said. Gooooooooo Tele! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JETKING Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 tele Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bluehuricane Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 gibson, just cause i like buckers for distortion and most of my music is distorted, however i'm planning on getting a tele for a project just cause i've been getting more into single coil cleans (owns the {censored} outta buckers for cleans) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KjStrat62 Posted August 22, 2007 Author Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 The tele. More comfortable to play and if Im not getting 24 frets, I guess the 21 on the tele over the 22 on the LP wont kill me. Teles just sound more alive and vintage mahogany LPs are essentially the "mommy buy me" version that totally blows. Mommy buy me versions?? Clarify dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members blackjack davey Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 I'm a Fender man all the way so I vote Tele'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members only_shallow Posted August 22, 2007 Members Share Posted August 22, 2007 *****TELE****** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.