Jump to content

NAD! More Marshall


Tommy Horrible

Recommended Posts

  • Members

That is good to hear
:thu:
I thought mine sounded massive too, until I threw the eq in the loop. Regardless, it was still big and mean without the eq! I was rocking a PRS McCarty with it today and it sounded awesome! The pickups aren't near as hot as the 500T, so I can only imagine the extra crunchiness you are getting...


So now that you have peaked my interests, I do believe some clips are in order :poke:
:D

Cole

 

Hmmmm, maybe if I can get the wife out of the house tommorow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hmmmm, maybe if I can get the wife out of the house tommorow.

 

I think a trip to the spa might be worth considering... I don't know a woman who would turn it down :D

 

Don't feel pressed to get it done quickly... I will be here, lurking and waiting patiently :thu:

 

Cole

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I might have been your buyer, but I want one with el34s. I'm going to dump all my other Marshalls and just have 2 of these. I played one with the 5881s and didn't jive with it.

 

 

wouldn't converting it over to 34's be an easy mod?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

wouldn't converting it over to 34's be an easy mod?

 

 

It might be. I'm no techie, but in a Carvin X100B converting to el34's from 6L6's I believe also requires a screen resistor change as well as grounding a pin to socket and changing the bias resistor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Members

 

How are the SLX's midgains and cleans?

 

 

This is all JCM900 MkIII

http://soundcloud.com/ejendres/remix1

 

I've heard that the main difference between the MkIII and the SL-X is that the SL-X is darker. I personally haven't played one so I can't say how true that is.

 

I know the cleans aren't perfectly clean, but I think the low gain tone of this amp is sick.

 

Listen around 3:00 to hear only guitar. And then around 3:30 to hear how the amp reacted when he dug in with his picking (i recorded this for a friend)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

This is all JCM900 MkIII



I've heard that the main difference between the MkIII and the SL-X is that the SL-X is darker. I personally haven't played one so I can't say how true that is.


I know the cleans aren't perfectly clean, but I think the low gain tone of this amp is sick.


Listen around 3:00 to hear only guitar. And then around 3:30 to hear how the amp reacted when he dug in with his picking (i recorded this for a friend)

 

 

Compared to most other Marshall's the SL-X's high gain sounds are darker/smoother. It's still Marshall bright and present, but in a smoother darker way than the 2203,JVM or DSL.

 

I particularly find the DSL's to be the most overly bright of any marshall I've played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...