If you use a looper pedal, and an effects loop...

[IRG]

I assume the looper pedal should go last, and be in the effects loop, and not out in front with dirt pedals, correct?

[RadioSilence]

depends if you want to play with the loop after you've recorded it.

 

for instance, if you want to record something with flanger, then record another loop without it, put the looper after the flanger.

if, on the other hand, you want to apply flanger to an already recorded loop, and have the option of turning it on and off, put the looper before the flanger.

[KoskineN]

I put my RC-2 at the end of the FX Loop. I have no need to add FXs over the loops and I loop stuff with the amp's dirt, so it's the most logical place IMO.

[IRG]

Well here's one of my issues. I just got a new amp, a Fender Mustang III, which has built in effects, and an effects loop. I'm going to play around with different settings momentarily, but I think I'll have it as my last pedal, in the effects loop and see how that goes.

[KoskineN]

I think it should works. You only need to know how the built in FXs and the FX loop is stacked. If it is built like a "normal" amp, you should be fine I guess.

[conky]

My Timefactor's looper sounds like {censored} in my FX loop. There is a volume drop on the looper that isn't there on any of the other delays. Plus, it gets really compressed and my guitar signal will completely crus the loop or be so muddy blending with its unusable. But it's the same thing when ised in front of the amp as well.Love the Timefactor and all of it's delays but I hate the looper on it.

[juri]

Yes last in line in the effects loop since you want to record/loop all the effects that are applied.

[THAT4301]

 

Yes last in line in the effects loop since you want to record/loop all the effects that are applied.

 

 

Except if you don't, of course, in which case don't