Members Tonemeister87 Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Thank you sir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members danbronson Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 I feel my Roadster (and therefore the Road King II as well) sounds a bit better than the 3 channel rectos. It's a bit more cleaned up sounding, snappier, richer midrange, more clarity. Don't know about the 2 channels though. Only heard them on stages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chudanez Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Really, everyone is going on about how the older 2 channels are better. But i've never noticed a difference. I've played through 2-channel and 3-channels and they both sounded pretty much the same to me. Prehaps if i spent more time with them i'd hear it though... What's the Road King like compared to the 2 channels then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Tonemeister87 Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Interesting. The problem still remains. If I go from a dirty rhythm sounds to a lead tone I still need to hit 2 swtiches....solo boost and something in the loop... I think I'm willing to sacrifice a slightly 'lesser' tone for a lot more versatility... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Random Hero Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by Chudanez Really, everyone is going on about how the older 2 channels are better. But i've never noticed a difference. I've played through 2-channel and 3-channels and they both sounded pretty much the same to me.Prehaps if i spent more time with them i'd hear it though...What's the Road King like compared to the 2 channels then? From my brief experience, the Road King has the same ch4 as the Recto ch3, only perhaps a little more refined, but ch3/vintage seems more like my 2 channels orange/vintage, as opposed to the 3 ch Recto's ch2/vintage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Tonemeister87 Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Simon Garlick Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by Random Hero From what i've played, just going on tone...2 channelRoad King3 channelIf I had the Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BrokenRomeo Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 I recently got this, and it sounds killer, better than any other recto I have owned or played, and that would be almost all of them other than the Road King I or II...the Roadster gets my vote, just for the Brit voicing on channel two and the extra channel for a total of 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Tonemeister87 Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Wow! I have SO much gas for Roadster now its not even funny! :o :mad: THe thing is, that would probably cost around 4000 US$ here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BrokenRomeo Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Sorry about the GAS...but it's a good deal here in the USA for $1899, considering the features, build quality and the competition... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Code-001 Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by Tonemeister69 Interesting. The problem still remains. If I go from a dirty rhythm sounds to a lead tone I still need to hit 2 swtiches....solo boost and something in the loop...I think I'm willing to sacrifice a slightly 'lesser' tone for a lot more versatility... Go MIDI and then you'll only have to hit 1 switch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BadRonald Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by BAZGUITARMAN I honestly think my current Single Recto series II is the best sounding Recto head I`ve ever played through. The best clean tones by far and the heavier tones kill with the lower power curve. I seem to be able to run my Single at about 1.5 notches higher on the master volume than the Duals I`ve tried. It seems to "open up" a little earlier, although the volume difference is negligable. The only "bad" thing about the Single is the lack of a third channel. To me it`s a little easier to set up the three channel Rectos in a live situation. The Single can easily do it, but takes some judicious tweaking to make it work for different rhythm and lead tones. Eric I've got a Rectoverb on the way. What you've said here is what I've been reading in most reviews. That people dig the Single Rec. I need no more than 50 watts for gigs, even on big stages. I am a single channel user that uses the volume knob on the guitar for cleans and hits a Keeley TS-9 or DS-1 Ultra for leads. I hope I really dig this amp.I have read some reviews regarding the effects loop. Some people have problems with them. Do you? Will I be able to run a DD-5 Delay pedal through the loop with no problems?Thanks for any info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Random Hero Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by Simon Garlick My experience is exactly the same as Random Hero's. In my limited experience of the 2-channel rackmount DR, it sounded exactly the same as the 2-channel head DR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Stratotone Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by reprove The racktifiers have always blown me away. AFI and From Autumn to Ashes still use theirs. I think they should reissue them.If i had the scratch, I would own one in a minute.1. Ractifiers2. Blackface 2 channels3. Roadking4. Three channel. no experience with the roadsters just yet. The 'blackface' was a cosmetic option. I know that my early 2 channel had the black grill/chrome chassis, but you could order it on later 2 channel models also. Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soulcrusher_X Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by Tonemeister69 Interesting. The problem still remains. If I go from a dirty rhythm sounds to a lead tone I still need to hit 2 swtiches....solo boost and something in the loop...I think I'm willing to sacrifice a slightly 'lesser' tone for a lot more versatility... The problem with the 3ch Rectos seems to be on CH3 MODERN mostly. People coment on how it sounds so much buzzier than CH2 on either the 2CH and 3CH models. The problem is the hyperactive presence knob. On CH3 with the presence knob at 10 o'clock, it's the same as having the presence knob fully cranked on CH2. With that said, I get massively fat, cutting tones out of my 3CH Triple with these settings: Gain: 1 o'clockPresence: 10-11 o'clockBass: 1-2 o'clockMids: 12-1 o'clockTreble: 12-1 o'clock I keep the OUTPUT knob close to noon and it sounds much better, much more open. Keep the mids up close to the treble setting and it sounds awesome. I use Tung-Sol and C9 tubes in the preamp and SED 6L6s running in the EL34/Bold/Tube rec. modes. I still would love to try a Single though, with it's lower wattage. I usually use only two channels anyway, Clean and Dirty. Does the Single really sound fatter/tighter at lower volumes than the Dual/Triple? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sordid1 Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by Stratotone I had an early two channel and two racktifiers - I thought the racktifiers sounded beefier with more clarity. No mud, just a lot of low end. Kings X 'Dogman' is what my two racktifiers sounded like.Pete Yeah Pete I have a buddy in town that has a rackmount DR and it always sounds killer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NITEFLY182 Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 The dualrectifier rackmount heads could be considered "better" only because they required significantly more hand wiring and design changes to fit everything into a smaller rack width chassis. Additionally, some of the components were a little higher quality to withstand the inherant rigors of rack life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cibyl Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by BrokenRomeo I recently got this, and it sounds killer, better than any other recto I have owned or played, and that would be almost all of them other than the Road King I or II...the Roadster gets my vote, just for the Brit voicing on channel two and the extra channel for a total of 4. That looks sharp as hell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members willy22 Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 I love my 2-channel. Mine's got an adjustable bias mod which helps tremendously imo. It's clearer, tighter, and more consistant than other other Recto's that I've heard. Btw, the differences between the Blackface models and the Chrome models are purely cosmetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BadRonald Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by BadRonald I've got a Rectoverb on the way. What you've said here is what I've been reading in most reviews. That people dig the Single Rec. I need no more than 50 watts for gigs, even on big stages. I am a single channel user that uses the volume knob on the guitar for cleans and hits a Keeley TS-9 or DS-1 Ultra for leads. I hope I really dig this amp. I have read some reviews regarding the effects loop. Some people have problems with them. Do you? Will I be able to run a DD-5 Delay pedal through the loop with no problems? Thanks for any info. ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BAZGUITARMAN Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by BadRonald I've got a Rectoverb on the way. What you've said here is what I've been reading in most reviews. That people dig the Single Rec. I need no more than 50 watts for gigs, even on big stages. I am a single channel user that uses the volume knob on the guitar for cleans and hits a Keeley TS-9 or DS-1 Ultra for leads. I hope I really dig this amp. I have read some reviews regarding the effects loop. Some people have problems with them. Do you? Will I be able to run a DD-5 Delay pedal through the loop with no problems? Thanks for any info. I have no problems with delay in my loop. It`s one of the f/x types that works really well with a parallel loop. Reverb also works pretty well. The only pedal I had much trouble out of was my EVH Phase 90. It would knock the signal level down when ingaged. I just moved it to the front of the amp and it`s fine.Eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BadRonald Posted September 9, 2006 Members Share Posted September 9, 2006 Originally posted by BAZGUITARMAN I have no problems with delay in my loop. It`s one of the f/x types that works really well with a parallel loop. Reverb also works pretty well. The only pedal I had much trouble out of was my EVH Phase 90. It would knock the signal level down when ingaged. I just moved it to the front of the amp and it`s fine. Eric Thanks for the info. Is your delay a pedal delay? Does the loop work well with pedals or is it set up for rackmount gear?Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Random Hero Posted September 10, 2006 Members Share Posted September 10, 2006 Originally posted by BadRonald Thanks for the info. Is your delay a pedal delay? Does the loop work well with pedals or is it set up for rackmount gear? Thanks. I've always used a G-Major in my two Rectos, but have always been tempted to switch to just a DD-20. If anyone here has used a Boss delay with the 2 channel Rectos, I wanna know how you got on.Btw, I read on here that my Blackface has a serial loop, identified by the attatched power cord, small logo and the fact it's a 92. Correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members guitarstar81 Posted September 10, 2006 Members Share Posted September 10, 2006 since I work at a Mesa dealer, I have played tons of different Rectos. Singles, Duals, Triples, Rectoverbs, the new Roadster, etc.... I have owned an early Tremoverb, and a Road King (series I). So aside from a Racktifier, I pretty much have the bases covered. From what I have played, the Roadster takes it. Followed closely by the Roadking, and then the Tremoverb. After that, I like the sound of the Duals (2 or 3 channel). The triple is my least favorite. It always has just sounded like a pile of mud at any volume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members willy22 Posted September 10, 2006 Members Share Posted September 10, 2006 Originally posted by Random Hero I've always used a G-Major in my two Rectos, but have always been tempted to switch to just a DD-20. If anyone here has used a Boss delay with the 2 channel Rectos, I wanna know how you got on. I've been using a Dan Echo with mine and I'm having a hell of a time with the loop. I run my DR a little differently; I use Orange/Modern for rhythm and Red/Modern for lead. I've got the loop set up on the red channel only. I like the Dan Echo ok, but I'm wondering if I can get a better sound from a rack unit or maybe a butter built floor unit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.