Members melandy Posted February 13, 2008 Members Share Posted February 13, 2008 Symmetry is bliss. Asymmetry is chaos. :poke:That compensated saddle must drive you nuts. No symmetry no matter which way you slice it. Seriously, tho... I've got a cut and non-cut. Aesthetically, I prefer a cutaway. Practically, I don't need it. Wallet says non-cut.Since we can't vote both, I'll say non-cut.-A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members missedmyexit Posted February 13, 2008 Members Share Posted February 13, 2008 Variety is the spice of life.. I Have two Cut aways and three non cutaways. I like the look of all of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cripes Posted February 13, 2008 Members Share Posted February 13, 2008 Goofy thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Terry Allan Hall Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 I keep meaning to buy a cutaway flat-top (Venetian, preferably, although the Selmer/Taylor style is fine, too...don't care for a pointy Florentine, aesthetically), as I play up the neck a lot, but for the last 40 years, I've just moved my hand around to the front of the guitar and gotten to the higher frets that way.As for electronics, I have passive USTs in all my guitars, plugged into a PADI. My other instrumants mostly have SBTs under the bridge area.Count me as a "one-of-these-days" cutaway fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bobc Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 I've owned both, but prefer the non cutaway. I think the non cutaway has better acoustics. Just my 2 cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members panhandler Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 I almost never play that high on the neck to merit a cutaway, but I love the way they look and I'm hoping to come out of my square shouldered dread rut this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rjoxyz Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 Me? A cutaway? Not talking jackets, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Davepch Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 i would usually opt for the cut-away, just as i would always usually opt for on-board electrics. i've never noticed a difference in the sound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members flip333 Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 I'm liking my first cutaway. I don't go up to fret 19, but its very comfortable at 12, or barring at 12 and reaching a pinky out to 14 or 15 for an Em voicing.Nice curve on the cutaway don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BROLEX Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 goo goo gaaa gaaa breedlove flip, how does it project, unamplified? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members flip333 Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 Hi Chuck,This has been an interesting guitar. I got GAS for a classical after I played a friend's Takamine SC132SC. Then I decided a 1 7/8' neck would be important to me.Well, after playing some nicer classicals like Ramirez, Rodriguez, and Cordoba in the $500 to $1200 range and some other cheapies, I decided the Breedlove AN250CR was pretty nice. I have not yet compared it back to back with other nylon string guitars for volume, but I couldn't detect a significant difference from memory. Unplugged, it is loud enough for me for now. That may change if I find a louder classical!More important to me is the responsiveness to touch and intonation. I could not get the others to tune up very well; they were always a little off key. This Breedlove tunes up nicely and intonates well over the board.I'm looking forward to a trip to the Podium in Minneapolis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Broadus Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 I won't say I wouldn't own a cutaway, but I don't need the feature. It would probably end up being like a some of the features I wanted on my notebook computer and don't use. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members acoustikyle Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 for me it depends on what the basic body shape is... and what i'm using the guitar for... on a smaller bodied, folk-style guitar, i prefer a cutaway since i'm often playing the upper registers, soloing, etc... my dreadnought is a non-cutaway, and i prefer it that way, since i use it for rhythm parts... plugged in, i find there's really no difference in tone b/w the cutaway and non-cutaway... so my acous/elec models have a cutaway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Michael Martin Posted February 14, 2008 Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 Nice curve on the cutaway don't you think? Er...no. Can't say I agree. Looks like you leaned it against a space heater and it began to melt. But: to each his/her own! BTW: I have 6 acoustics. Two are cutaways (an Applause and a Tak). I've discovered that I just don't need the cut for my playing style, and that I really like the symmetry of an uncut guitar. Also: In aesthetic terms, I think dreads are more cuttable than, for instance, jumbos. Cut dreads CAN look cool; cut jumbos always look awkward and strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Stackabones Posted February 14, 2008 Author Members Share Posted February 14, 2008 I'm liking my first cutaway. I don't go up to fret 19, but its very comfortable at 12, or barring at 12 and reaching a pinky out to 14 or 15 for an Em voicing. Nice curve on the cutaway don't you think? Love it. Cutaway reminds me of the Selmer's.I also dig those fret markers. Tastefully done imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members pk1fan Posted February 15, 2008 Members Share Posted February 15, 2008 I have 2 of each , spend more time playing the cutaways , so my vote goes to cutaway . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members flip333 Posted February 15, 2008 Members Share Posted February 15, 2008 Geez Michael, thats about like saying it was humped by a whore with a sandpaper crotch down by the river.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members T.B. Posted February 16, 2008 Members Share Posted February 16, 2008 Up or down vote uh? OK, I'll go with no-cutaway though I really don't care. If a guitar sounds lovely and feels good in my hands, I can forgo aesthetics pretty much. Freeman mentioned he didn't like how the neck heel and body came together on cutaway: If off the rack guitar builders could find a way to build compound cutaways economically. Trina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Markuster Posted February 16, 2008 Members Share Posted February 16, 2008 I think I've told this story before, but:I walked into my local store, cash in hand, intent on leaving with a spruce over rosewood, no cut, non-electric. I certainly didn't want a "barndoor" in the side. After I played this, I had to go home and think about it for a couple of weeks. When I went back, I played everything comparable in the store and this is the one that spoke to me:Well, it does have a spruce top...Hog B&S w/ Venetian cut and baggs Imix (Ibeam and element) pickups and on-board preamp.Play 'em all, get the one that you love.Markus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AugTPD Posted February 16, 2008 Members Share Posted February 16, 2008 No cutaway for me right now. I've owned both in the past. Back in the day I really preferred the look of a cutaway but as my tastes have changed I now prefer no cutaway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.