Members Angry Tele Posted October 21, 2009 Members Share Posted October 21, 2009 yeah its a stretch to say wood doesn't affect tone,resonance,sustain etc; Its one thing to not be able to quantify something and another to say it doesn't exist. I think broad generalizations can be made about different wood species...But then of course my Twin Reverb on 8 levels the playing field a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members fabstrat Posted October 21, 2009 Members Share Posted October 21, 2009 theres no way wood doesn't make a difference, now wether your ears can delineate it or care is another story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Davo17 Posted October 21, 2009 Members Share Posted October 21, 2009 All of the common strat tonewoods sound pretty close. There is enough variability in the types that its diffucult to make generalizations. Im a fan of ash myself. Its a bit brighter-but I think this is more a function of its density. Its also easier for me to cut a bit of treble response then to boost it. I think the neck has a much bigger impact on tone. Picture a bow (as in bow and arrow, not violin bow). The bow string represents the guitar string. Now picture 3/4's of the bow as the "neck" and 1/4 as the body. Both effect the interaction with the string-but the necks flexibility has a greater impact-assuming of course you dont throw in an extreme wood, like balsa. Remember the pups on most strats are floating on a plastic plate, so direct intereaction between pups and body are much less then other solid bodies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mel Cooley Posted October 21, 2009 Members Share Posted October 21, 2009 I like alder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hecticone Posted October 21, 2009 Members Share Posted October 21, 2009 Every guitar that I have bought, the first thing I do is hold it by the head stock,pluck the b string and see if I can feel any type of resonance down at the input jack.If not its just not a lively guitar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Davo17 Posted October 21, 2009 Members Share Posted October 21, 2009 I have found that the swimming pool route that Fender used during the 90s is the largest factor in tone suckage for those guitars. The route has so little affect in the way of tone that I doubt it was the "largest factor". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members PlectrumPete Posted October 22, 2009 Members Share Posted October 22, 2009 I think the wood does make a very small difference. Like really small. However, there is more difference between 2 (or is it 3 or more) pieces of Ash than there is between some generalised Ash or Alder or whatever it says on the label. It's the generalisations developed over weeks of playground debate that I disagree with, not the fact that 2 guitars can sound slightly different from each other. Although my theory is that most of the differences are down to differences coming from the wide manufacturing tolerance of the electronics, especially the tone cap and pots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frets99 Posted October 22, 2009 Share Posted October 22, 2009 Don't worry so much about the type of wood. Just remember to only sand down to where the tone is. Too much sanding and you bypass it completely. Too little and you only get a whiff of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.