Jump to content

Why Epiphone Casinos have no equal


Willyguitar

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Quote Originally Posted by fixintogo View Post
Of course not. But at three grand, ES-330s are exorbitantly expensive, so most of us get the closest thing that we can actually afford.

You might turn your nose up at an ES-330 for $600, but I doubt that you're typical. After all, Epiphone upgrades the IBJL and '61 Reissue Casinos with Gibson electronics and pickups.
The Elitist ones are close to 2 grand and the build quality is superb. Also they're made in Japan since CoO seems to be uber important to you. Not everyone can afford one, but Epiphone makes them because people buy them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

since CoO seems to be uber important to you.

 

 

I have no idea why you think we're having an argument, but if you're going to treat this as one, at least have the courtesy to not decide for me what I think is important. Thanks.

 

My biggest gripe about the MIK and MIC Casinos I've owned and/or played has been the electronics: scratchy pots, and a pickup selector and jack that cut out ittermittently. I think the poly finish of the TQ I had was applied very thick, and silencing the rattles from within were a constant battle. I enjoyed the guitar, but if I could have gotten a 330 at the same price, I certainly would have. I doubt I'm alone on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Quote Originally Posted by fixintogo View Post
Of course not. But at three grand, ES-330s are exorbitantly expensive, so most of us get the closest thing that we can actually afford.

You might turn your nose up at an ES-330 for $600, but I doubt that you're typical.
Maybe I should mention my Casino is a Limited Edition, only 1965 made, John Lennon 1965 USA Series. Lacquer finish, switchcraft parts, Gibson p-90s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My parents bought a new Casino for me in 1965. I'll never sell it since it was my first electric. But, it's definitely the worst guitar in my collection. It has a bland sound for studio.

For live use... don't care about the Beatle clips earlier.......When I first got it, I was using stacks of Bandmaster and bassman amps. To generate the volume needed to match the others in the band, feedback was absolutely uncontrollable if I turned towards the amps.

For songs that NEEDED feedback... it was perfect. But even in those days, I'd only stand towards the amp using feedback for a minute or two at a time (being those were the psychedelic days). Unuseable for most sets other than that.

When I later moved to Sunn 1000s and Marshalls in 1967, it was worse. The diff of course was that hollow body compared to a 335 with the block inside.

The stock bigsby was another joke with the cotter pin. I did change that to a real bigsby in 1966.

Overall, the Epi is nice to hold with its thin design. The dark wood back on mine (don't know if that's still a feature) looks pretty.

But alas, the Casino sits in its case for almost 45 years now.

It's just not a good guitar... for me... for gigging or for studio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Quote Originally Posted by Rick 381

View Post

Maybe I should mention my Casino is a Limited Edition, only 1965 made, John Lennon 1965 USA Series. Lacquer finish, switchcraft parts, Gibson p-90s

 

Well played biggrin.gif. I would love to get my hands on one of those!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Quote Originally Posted by fixintogo View Post
My biggest gripe... has been the electronics: scratchy pots, and a pickup selector and jack that cut out ittermittently. I think the poly finish of the TQ I had was applied very thick, and silencing the rattles from within were a constant battle.
Important.

Quote Originally Posted by fixintogo View Post
...the MIK and MIC...
Unimportant


Jus' sayin'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Quote Originally Posted by fixintogo

View Post

if I could have gotten a 330 at the same price, I certainly would have. I doubt I'm alone on this.

 

You're not alone. Who wouldn't snag a $3000 guitar (or anything really) at 80% off over an item that is selling at that price normally. Only an idiot would providing they're both in good condition. It's a pretty silly point actually.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Unimportant

 

 

Again, you're picking a fight where none exists. The Casinos that I've been unhappy with happened to be imports. I have never once implied or stated that it was because they were imports that I was unhappy with them. If theire electronics worked better and their pickups sounded better and they had a thinner finish, I'd have a closet full of them.

 

YOU seem to be the one who is "uber-concerned" with country of origin. Please stop projecting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Quote Originally Posted by fixintogo View Post

My biggest gripe about the MIK and MIC Casinos I've owned and/or played has been the electronics: scratchy pots, and a pickup selector and jack that cut out ittermittently. I think the poly finish of the TQ I had was applied very thick, and silencing the rattles from within were a constant battle. I enjoyed the guitar, but if I could have gotten a 330 at the same price, I certainly would have. I doubt I'm alone on this.
This isn't really a valid argument. There are Casinos at all price points so comparing a Custom Shop ES-330 with a standard Chinese Casino is seems a little silly. A direct comparison between the two will of course highlight differences in quality in some cases but if you compare the 330 to an Elitist, made in the Terada factory alongside Gretsch guitars, or something like Rick 381's JL Casino you might think again.

I wouldn't say that my G&L Legacy is better than a Fender Strat simply on the basis of my experience with some Chinese Fenders so the same should apply here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

You're not alone. Who wouldn't snag a $3000 guitar (or anything really) at 80% off over an item that is selling at that price normally. Only an idiot would providing they're both in good condition. It's a pretty silly point actually.

 

 

My "silly point" was in response to Ric 381, who had not yet disclosed that he was talking about a two-grand Elitist when he said he would not trade his Casino for a Gibson, even with cash thrown in.

 

I have no idea who pissed in your Corn Flakes this morning or why you seem intent on picking a fight with me over it, but you can knock it off anytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

nobody
wants an ES-330 ... People who want a Casino want a Casino
not an ES-330

 

 

Given this assertion, I stand by my response: When it comes to a fully-hollow thinline with P-90s, I would rather have an ES-330 than a Casino. Maybe not ANY Casino that you could possibly name, but in general.

 

Why is this so controversial?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Quote Originally Posted by fixintogo View Post
Having owned both, I'd take the 330 any day.



People who buy a Casino can't afford an ES-330.
I think that this is probably the reason that people have reacted less than favourably to your posts. Not only is it not true, it seems deliberately controversial
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that this is probably the reason that people have reacted less than favourably to your posts.


Not only is it not true, it seems deliberately controversial

 

It's only controversial to people who look at every discussion as an excuse to argue.

 

What I posted was certainly true for me. I had a 330 back in the 70s, and stupidly sold it. When I wanted to replace it many years later, I couldn't afford one. So I got a Casino instead. But I'd still rather have the Gibson.

 

Sorry if that hurts people's feelings. :idk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Besides being into one of these things, i.e. a Casino, I also picked up the Hofner CT Club a while back. And even though it's classified as a Semi-hollow, its got some characteristics that are more similar to the Casino than any of my other gits.

also has German made mini-hums, but it produces a tone and feel that has some similarities to the Casino. MF dumped these a while ago for $299.xx so I had to pick one up. Got a Beatle haircut to go with it too. wink.gif
DV016_Jpg_Large_482168.056_sunburst.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot

View Post

Lennon was known for not having his guitar set up properly. I expect any problems he was having was due to neglect, more than anything. My Casinos play like buttah.

 

Yeah, I seriously doubt he hated his Casino, it was his main guitar from 1965 until the early seventies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...