Jump to content

New Vox Wah V847A


zinzin

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It depends on where it is located. If it sits where Dunlop placed in in the GCB-95, it is not good for the wah sound, IMHO. The buffer (located right before the input to the circuit) was one of the very few things that differed between the V847 and the Dunlop GCB-95, and it was added by Dunlop in an effort to try to minimize tone sucking in bypass mode. Going to true bypass would have been far more effective (as the buffer doesn't actually buffer the bypass signal - it sits right on the effect input, to raise its input impedance). I was under the impression that the V847A was true bypass, so I don't see the point of them adding a buffer to it :confused: unless of course they added the buffer to the output of the wah circuit, to help it cut through fuzz (like a Foxrox FWR).

 

/Andreas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ah... that makes it basically a GCB-95 in Vox clothing - the buffer and adapter jack was just about the only difference between them before, and now the V847 has them too.


/Andreas

But you see when you go out and BUY ONE and compare it to said Wah pedal it ain't the same.It is actually voiced closer to the 848 than the 847.It does not suck tone,and works rather well for what it is.:thu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...