Members thermionic geek Posted February 28, 2011 Members Share Posted February 28, 2011 Screw you you lucky young slackers! http://www.slate.com/id/2286240/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cougar Hunter Posted February 28, 2011 Members Share Posted February 28, 2011 one still has to display high value. There are plenty of average, frustrated chumps out there not getting any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members carvinlegacy99 Posted February 28, 2011 Members Share Posted February 28, 2011 "Failing at Life" is a little strong isn't it? I thought to fail at life meant that you are dead, or at least not happy with your life. There are plenty of married guys with great paying jobs who are failing at life because they work 80 hours a week and never see their kids. Lots of people fail due to insane debt. I guess people that get arrested alot are failing too. I mean unless you just really like jail. I mean anal rape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gt_jumper Posted February 28, 2011 Members Share Posted February 28, 2011 This is an American study.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members thermionic geek Posted February 28, 2011 Author Members Share Posted February 28, 2011 This is an American study.... And your point is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Harvest Posted March 1, 2011 Members Share Posted March 1, 2011 If women were more fully in charge of how their relationships transpired, we'd be seeing, on average, more impressive wooing efforts, longer relationships, fewer premarital sexual partners, shorter cohabitations, and more marrying going on. Instead, according to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (which collects data well into adulthood), none of these things is occurring. Not one. The terms of contemporary sexual relationships favor men and what they want in relationships, not just despite the fact that what they have to offer has diminished, but in part because of it. And it's all thanks to supply and demand. Respect the cawk But I gotta say, that whole paragraph is a load of {censored}. By definition, women are involved with just as many {censored} buddy relationships as men (not counting erm... those on other teams). Do they seriously think they can prove that women are only in those types of arrangements because they can't get a guy to pop a ring on her finger after 3 dates? Yeah right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members OverDriven Posted March 1, 2011 Members Share Posted March 1, 2011 Hang on...this is an entire article stating that young men get laid (despite being losers)? Really? Guys in that age range are more likely to be physically attractive, and when it comes to getting laid that is all it takes. I mean here's the thing...women are just like us...they're turned on by a good looking guy. If you don't have looks then you can replace it with money, humor or intelligence, but nothing works like good looks. I'm still confused as to why this warranted an article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Markdude Posted March 1, 2011 Members Share Posted March 1, 2011 Pointless study is pointless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ron Burgandy Posted March 1, 2011 Members Share Posted March 1, 2011 one still has to display high value. There are plenty of average, frustrated chumps out there not getting any. D.E.N.N.I.S. System :thu: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cougar Hunter Posted March 1, 2011 Members Share Posted March 1, 2011 D .E .N .N .I .S . System :thu: pretty much. that, or the mystery method. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Matt Gnarly Posted March 1, 2011 Members Share Posted March 1, 2011 Works every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.