Members Yarbicus Posted November 9, 2011 Members Share Posted November 9, 2011 I didn't think you were trying to be a prick at all. Actually, the same goes for Yarbicus and everybody else involved in this thread. As far as I'm concerned we're just having a good discussion/conversation here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Anomaly Posted November 9, 2011 Members Share Posted November 9, 2011 Actually, I do jury duty every time I am called. There are very few actual "facts" here. It it his word against theirs. You seem to have decided to accept his word. I find theirs credible enough at this point. Besides, they have nothing to gain. A few minutes on tv just to be reviled by a large segment of the population is hardly worth it. That is exactly what I mean. I didn't even type his name, how are you coming to your conclusions? I'm not accepting ANYONE'S word on this subject. All I'm saying is that none of us know that woman any more than we know Cain, so, I'm not taking EITHER of their word for anything, and like Billy said, we will never know if anything happened at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Yarbicus Posted November 9, 2011 Members Share Posted November 9, 2011 That is exactly what I mean. I didn't even type his name, how are you coming to your conclusions?I'm not accepting ANYONE'S word on this subject. All I'm saying is that none of us know that woman any more than we know Cain, so, I'm not taking EITHER of their word for anything, and like Billy said, we will never know if anything happened at all. Gotcha. I can see your point. Sorry to put words in your mouth. I actually teach objective critical thinking. This is a case that we will have to weigh what info we have access to. The info I have seen makes me think there is at least something to the allegations. And "something" is not so good. Shouldn't disqualify him outright BUT it is pretty significant negative factor. Man, as a moderate Evangelical, I see that my more conservative brethren and sister'en have one heck of a choice: Mormon or harasser. That should be an obvious choice but it won't be for far too many narrow people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Phrophus Posted November 9, 2011 Members Share Posted November 9, 2011 I don't think anyone's mentioned this in this thread, but (1) sexual harassment allegations are easy to fabricate (2) high profile ones stir up a lot of {censored} regardless of truth (3) Herman Cain's Republican opponents have the most to gain by damaging Cain's reputation. Just food for thought in case it hasn't been mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Yarbicus Posted November 9, 2011 Members Share Posted November 9, 2011 I don't think anyone's mentioned this in this thread, but (1) sexual harassment allegations are easy to fabricate (2) high profile ones stir up a lot of {censored} regardless of truth (3) Herman Cain's Republican opponents have the most to gain by damaging Cain's reputation. Just food for thought in case it hasn't been mentioned. However, Reps also have the most to gain by getting this out in the air NOW. If Cain were the nominee and this came out during the general election, it would be a much larger disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Phrophus Posted November 9, 2011 Members Share Posted November 9, 2011 However, Reps also have the most to gain by getting this out in the air NOW. If Cain were the nominee and this came out during the general election, it would be a much larger disaster. So, your point is whether true or not, Reps still have the most to gain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Yarbicus Posted November 9, 2011 Members Share Posted November 9, 2011 So, your point is whether true or not, Reps still have the most to gain? Probably because Libs would LOVE to have Cain as the candidate. Obama would destroy him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ***1776*** Posted November 9, 2011 Members Share Posted November 9, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/ap-exclusive-accuser-filed-complaint-next-job-080946066.htmlHmmmmmmmm, makes ya wonder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members TheRymanChu Posted December 3, 2011 Members Share Posted December 3, 2011 lol sigh. perry hates black people; cain is a mo'lesta; paul is nuts; barry just hasn't had long enough to work his {censored} out we b fukked i'm probably the only one that remembers the Duke lacrosse scandal, but hey let's just ignore facts as much as possible! Is it too early to nominate Hermain Cain for sainthood, or do we need to wait until he performs three miracles first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.