Members Gary Cohn Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 Do you ever wonder where all of our nuclear missile silos are? Trips me out; I'm driving around and I wonder, "that 10x10 foot coffee stand looks suspicious, I wonder if a nuclear missile silo could be underneath it?" Do you guys ever wonder where we've hidden our missile silos? Are they located in densely populated areas, or do you think there are farmers out there that have been told to stfu and have them tucked away on their farm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KCTigerChief Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 I think most of them are in sparsely populated areas. Most are also on government owned land...or what was once government owned land. However, I'm sure there are exceptions to both of these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Rampage Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 They should close them all down anyway. There's no place in our world for nuclear weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Anomaly Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 I often wonder, if 7-11 is open 24 hours, why is there a lock on the door? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NeloAngelo Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 They should close them all down anyway. There's no place in our world for nuclear weapons. words escape me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sheik_Yerbouti Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 They should close them all down anyway. There's no place in our world for nuclear weapons. Truf, although I wouldn't exactly hold my breath on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NeloAngelo Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 Truf, although I wouldn't exactly hold my breath on that one. hai world, the united states are getting rid of our nuclear weapons, plz dn't shoot urs at us. kthxbai. you know why we haven't been hit with a nuke? because we have nukes. this world is about have vs have not. those that have, have power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KCTigerChief Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 They should close them all down anyway. There's no place in our world for nuclear weapons. Directly after the Japan attacks, I would agree. But since unstable governments now have their hands on the technology, and capability, I strongly disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members sleewell Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 i love our stance on nuclear weapons; we have them but other countries should not. lol, good old 'murica hey is that missile silo in your pocket or are you just happy to see me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JR13 Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 yeah.. the whole "you first... no you first" mentality has ensured that a world of no nukes won't happen for a longgg time. its a nice thought though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NeloAngelo Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 i love our stance on nuclear weapons; we have them but other countries should not. lol, good old 'muricahey is that missile silo in your pocket or are you just happy to see me? no ones pushing to disarm russia or china anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RSBro Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 Charlie: Excuse me, Lieutenant. Is there something wrong? Maverick: Yes ma'am, the data on the MiG is inaccurate. Charlie: How's that, Lieutenant? Maverick: Well, I just happened to see a MiG 28 do a... Goose: We! Maverick: Uh, sorry, Goose. *We* happened to see a MiG 28 do a 4g negative dive. Charlie: Where did you see this? Maverick: Uh, that's classified. Charlie: It's what? Maverick: It's classified. I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Anomaly Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 Psssht, no nukes? Insanity. We need these things in order to eradicate each other, in large numbers, as efficiently as possible! I can't imagine a world without that. That's silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JR13 Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 i think the solution is to use our nukes on everyone else! That way we won't have them, and no one else will be alive to use the technology on us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members sleewell Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 no ones pushing to disarm russia or china anymore. ok so its just countries that dont have them yet who we are discouraging from getting them. either way its a lot like some rich person telling you that you cant buy a nice car as they speed away in theirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Phrophus Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 I don't really know that I want to know where they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KCTigerChief Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 ok so its just countries that dont have them yet who we are discouraging from getting them. either way its a lot like some rich person telling you that you cant buy a nice car as they speed away in theirs. It's really the countries who openly express their desires to completely demolish the western world. What's the quickest way to do that? Nuke large metropolitan areas. It's not that hard to understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Phrophus Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 ok so its just countries that dont have them yet who we are discouraging from getting them. either way its a lot like some rich person telling you that you cant buy a nice car as they speed away in theirs. Read up about the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NeloAngelo Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 ok so its just countries that dont have them yet who we are discouraging from getting them. either way its a lot like some rich person telling you that you cant buy a nice car as they speed away in theirs. just look at the regime running the countries we are trying to stop form getting nukes. use your brain. this is the downfall of the world right here. no one uses their {censored}ing common sense. we have them, other countries have them, but they have been smart enough not to use them.they are pretty much a retaliation option for those who do have them. we haven't been under nuclear threat since cuba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sheik_Yerbouti Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 Directly after the Japan attacks, I would agree. But since unstable governments now have their hands on the technology, and capability, I strongly disagree. We won't evolve past the need for "mutually-assured destruction" until we evolve past the glorified monkey stage where we slaughter one another over everything from what version of "God" we pray to to who challenges our dominance as the top pack of monkeys. Sadly, this will most likely only ever happen when we're confronted with our own extinction as a species, an extinction we will most probably bring about ourselves. Humans, in spite of all our delusions and pretense of "civilization", are a fundamentally-insane and primitive species, still ultimately controlled and driven to genocide by the tribal monkey parts of our brains that served us well when we were still monkeys competing for the resources to survive. Sure, we've invented more clever sticks to bludgeon each other to death with, but ultimately, we're still the same knuckle-dragging, violent and paranoid apes. Evolution tends not to be very kind to species that don't evolve, why should we be any different? But at least I'm not cynical... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members M-III Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 The concept of the threat of mutually assured destruction is apparently lost on some people, it's seemed to work for most of the civilized nations who own them for the past oh what, 70 years or so now? But yea, now that some 3rd world nations are starting to acquire them,(read: North Korean, Iran) we'll see how well this works out... I'm rather reluctant to see if the rag-heads over in the sandbox(or Kim Jong Un) are crazy (or stupid I should say) enough to push "the button" and doom us all. Russian roulette anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NeloAngelo Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 The concept of the threat of mutually assured destruction is apparently lost on some people, it's seemed to work for most of the civilized nations who own them for the past oh what, 90 years or so now? But yea, now that some 3rd world nations are starting to acquire them,(read: North Korean, Iran) we'll see how well this works out... I'm rather reluctant to see if the rag-heads over in the sandbox(or Kim Jong Un) are crazy (or stupid I should say) enough to push "the button" and doom us all. Russian roulette anyone? didn't we recently make a breakthrough with north korea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KCTigerChief Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 didn't we recently make a breakthrough with north korea? They just agreed to sanctions and inspections...Not really anything breakthrough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sheik_Yerbouti Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 we have them, other countries have them, but they have been smart enough not to use them.they are pretty much a retaliation option for those who do have them. we haven't been under nuclear threat since cuba. Actually, the Russians, paranoid and 110% convinced that a war game we were playing was in fact REAL, and that we were GOING to launch a full-scale nuclear attack against them, almost launched a pre-emptive strike in 1983, and we didn't even know it until after the fact. We were MUCH closer to a nuclear holocaust then than we were during the Cuban missile crisis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NeloAngelo Posted March 13, 2012 Members Share Posted March 13, 2012 Actually, the Russians, paranoid and convinced that a war game we were playing was in fact REAL, almost launched a pre-emptive strike in 1983, and we didn't even know it until after the fact. We were MUCH closer to a nuclear holocaust then than we were during the Cuban missile crisis. and when they drop the bomb, we have an immediate counter attack, everyone wins. speak of mutually assured destruction? nice story, tell it to readers digest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.