Jump to content

NAD: Peavey Bravo 112


foose4string

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

The amp is definitely healthy. Nothing wrong with it other than the fact the tubes have never been changed...and it still sounds pretty good despite that! I just ordered a new set of JJ tubes. Very much looking forward to hearing it with the new tubes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1991 Amp of the year I believe, and 2 x EL84 are about 16watts tops, at least with this B+

 

Replacing the speaker if THE hot ticket, many like Celestion V30, but a guy on Youtube had his through a Mesa Thiele and it sounded godlike, with a ported cab making the bright EL84 sound just about perfectly dark.

 

The reverb is a problem as most squeal above "5" so bagging it can help, The PS caps could use a replacement likely, with bigger values in the same size making things quieter,

many swear by bypassing the "coring diode" noise gate but it only changes the clean channel a bit IME, and WTFCs.

 

my Bravo was $50 from a Clist ad that had one of the heater fuses burned, a great little amp usually (stupidly) sold by guys who buy the "gotta have 120w 4x12 stack if you gig twice yearly" bull{censored} and live in regret forevermore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

Been a couple of weeks since the new tubes. Definitely cleaned up the tone a bit. The clean channel has a little more sparkle. The distortion channel has a little more chunk and not quite as flubby in the bass response. Mids seem about the same....maybe a little more clarity there too. Overall, the amp seemed a little warmer with the Peavey tubes in it. The overall volume is about the same. Neither set of tubes sounds bad, just different. To be honest, haven't done a carp load of practicing on guitar and have not had a lot of time to break the new tubes in. Playing fiddle in 3 bands has been keeping me pretty busy lately, so most of my playing time has been devoted to that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

New tubes and a new speaker really bring this bad boy to life. Replacing the baffle board with something made of better wood also helps, but the speaker is the most important replacement. The stock speaker is garbage, just about anything will be an upgrade.

 

I personally found the G12T-100 to be a great match with this amp as it helps beef up the low end that the amp lacks on it's own (due to using EL-84's, which are mid heavy, and due to being an open back combo). Others have had great results with the Vintage 30. Would love to hear a G12H-30 in a Bravo, that might be the ticket.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

New tubes and a new speaker really bring this bad boy to life. Replacing the baffle board with something made of better wood also helps, but the speaker is the most important replacement. The stock speaker is garbage, just about anything will be an upgrade.


I personally found the G12T-100 to be a great match with this amp as it helps beef up the low end that the amp lacks on it's own (due to using EL-84's, which are mid heavy, and due to being an open back combo). Others have had great results with the Vintage 30. Would love to hear a G12H-30 in a Bravo, that might be the ticket.....

 

 

I'm leaning towards putting a k100 in my combo, or maybe looking at some of the emi legends. It sounds killer through my 1x12 with the k100, that is an open back cab.

It sounds awesome through my 1960, but also have to take into account that's a closed back cab, and perhaps a t75 wouldn't sound that good in an open back combo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been eyeballing the Carvin(Eminence) guitar speakers. If just about any speaker is an upgrade from the stock speaker, then would a Carvin speaker be worth it? A V30 would be nice, but it's more dollars than I feel comfortable throwing at this amp at the moment. There aren't too many V30 haters, and it seems like it would be a perfect match though. A Legend might be a good compromise. The new tubes were a fun experiment, and by all accounts was probably a wise decision to change, but I think that $50 would have been better spent towards a new speaker. I hate being cheap, but seeing as guitar takes a backseat most of the time, and don't know that I'll be gigging with this amp any time soon, I need to allocate my funds wisely. Ever priced a set of good violin strings and bow rehairs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Members

I just got one for the second time, and this time I try it with my main guitar and I just dont belive it!!! a small amp for $100 bucks sounds like a $500, frist time I knew it was a tube amp but I just try to make some money out of it, this time Iwas more interested than a cat with a string under the table, so I took it to my music room, play it by it self and I was like woooowww than I hook it to my Genz-Benz Gflex 2x12 cab wow even better, than try it with a 4x12 Fender cab mmmmm not good, the cab sucks even with celestion vintage speakers yet this amp realy rocks, I know I can play a lot new metal under 25 watts for sure!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...