Snowcow

also i dated a half korean. Which half?

She's better without the makeup (and hair).

Megan Fox looks good regardless of the photographer trying to make her look like white trash. I think the tattoo of NJB does an adequate job of that.

No-brainer: a strat. Nothing is as versatile, comfortable, and well-priced.

Just makes me like him more.

nope. Tires and Tennis rackets Nope. Shoes.

That is because you have an avator as your avator and your blind. http://www.english-zone.com/verbs/your1.html

Um... I don't care for Taylor Swift's music and I personally think the fact that she is winning these "country music" awards at every damn award show is monkey balls, but I would know lots of adults who would consider her music decent. Not everyone on earth is a musician you know. Not everyone on earth has good music taste. Sad, but true.

So a song is only good if you like it? :poke: I wonder how many successful musicians opt to write quality stuff and never sell more then one album. Oh heck thats no albums - it would pirated and downloaded from the www. You seem to be more interested in money than art. Sad.

my bad. she's not great (obviously) but I consider anyone who can write a decent song that appeals to people talented. I sure as hell can't I reiterate: popularity does not equal quality. She writes {censored}. Any adult who considers her music 'decent', should be ashamed.

Oh by the way, I am not a huge fan of Taylor's but she has gained a sizeable audience, plays guitar and writes songs. Not bad. John Lennon was 23 when Meet The Beatles came out in America. Only time will tell with Taylor. 1. Popularity does not equal quality. 2. The songs she writes are pop {censored}. Really awful stuff. 3. Hopefully, time will tell her to give up.

Your so smart and witty, have you considered comedy? hahah, funny tee hee...thanks for the giggle http://www.english-zone.com/teach/your1.html

When did he ever look like a man?

how about something like the MXR Micro Amp? could i use something like this to boost my volume? Yep, they're ok. Also, these:

Push all sliders to the top. Honestly.

I'm through with this, you just keep repeating yourself, and wasting my time. Good, back to school with you then

Again, post one piece of documentation backing that up. The original manual is in that link, not one word about string gauge. I think you're full of it. Even reading through all the Patents on file delivers no "recommended string gauge", or that one was ever considered in the design. I'll beleive you if you can supply some type of evidence to back that up, but to say that 9-42s are the "strings the Floyd Rose was designed for" reeks of guitar shop BS. Do your research buddy (Just a hint ... research is not limited to the internet)

Show me anywhere in documentation that Floyd Rose has ever said this. Even vintage ads and instructions from the first trems never list a "recommended string guage". Their main user, EVH, used lighter string(9-38 or something). Based on your lack of knowledge of the single locking Floyd II from that other thread, you might want to do some research: http://www.vintagekramer.com/parts6.htm Do your research (I did) ... they were designed to be used with 9 -42s. Plain and simple fact. Many people have used many different gauges, but that does not alter the fact that they were designed specifically for 9 -42.

there is no such thing as "best" strings for floyd rose. string em w/ whats comfortable. just like stop tails or other kinds of vibrato bars Actually, there IS. Genuine Floyd Rose floating trems were designed to use 9 - 42 strings. Other gauges can be used, but for the best performance, stability, intonation, and reliability, 9 -42 is the recommended string gauge.