Jump to content

why dont guitar/amp/pedal cos advertise on TV?


Angry Tele

Recommended Posts

  • Members

You might just as well ask how come you don't see any ads for speed boats on TV. There aren't because the advertising market for that product is already served by specialist publications, just like musical instrument business is. The same could be said for all sorts of specialist products. Unless you're already interested in guitars an ad on TV isn't likely to make you go out and buy one, and it's not likely to make you change your brand preference like the advertisers for other products hope their ads will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You might just as well ask how come you don't see any ads for speed boats on TV. There aren't because the advertising market for that product is already served by specialist publications, just like musical instrument business is. The same could be said for all sorts of specialist products. Unless you're already interested in guitars an ad on TV isn't likely to make you go out and buy one, and it's not likely to make you change your brand preference like the advertisers for other products hope their ads will.

 

so youre saying TV ads dont work? They do, IMO. The main goal is brand recognition. Thats all they want to acheive. (the ultimate would be like Kleenex, or Coke-brand names synonymous with products) and the lifestyle angle would work really well, for example tie-in Gibsons to some foo-foo red wine and Teles to some overly hopped IPA.

 

and for the record I do see boat TV ads all the time especially during fishing shows.

 

music isnt a niche market. no more than craft beer drinkers are. remember GC sells crap for drums, keyboards , and all other types of nonsense-not just Teles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Looking at the magazine selection in mainstream stores it appears that playing music is not nearly as popular as hunting, knitting, collecting guns, and many other hobbies/interests. Even music magazines for listeners (not just players) are fairly rare, usually they're for teeny boppers and hip hop fans if they have any at all..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would cost a small fortune that, while Fender and Gibson might, most gear mfr's don't have.

 

Nielsen doesn't compile stats based on specific hobbies to my knowledge, so when would you air it?

 

They have much better success throwing ads in GW or PG and rolling out YouTube demos that link to their site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Someone here should make a cool youtube channel testing out gear like its a {censored}in mid day talk show.

 

That is not a half-bad idea.

 

Problem is, there are really only two ways for this to happen:

 

1. A hobbyist just does it with no industry support. You would have to buy A LOT of gear for the show to be worth following, bleeding money in hopes of eventually finding a way to build it into enough of a success that it could be ad-supported.

 

2. Somebody with industry connections gets their hands of lots of free gear for evaluation. The problem there, of course, is guitarists will take you a little less seriously, because even if you're not a shill, you'll come off as one. And honestly, even somebody who doesn't set out to be a shallow pitch-man will be awfully tempted to give glowing reviews to Devi Ever fuzz boxes if Devi herself is sending free loaners and being nice to them. It's almost impossible to maintain objectivity once you have even the shallowest of working relationships with the people you are reviewing, which is why Consumer Reports never accepts free samples or demos of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As others have noted, commercials are in large part intended to increase brand recognition, but the two biggest guitar companies that might have enough money to run expensive TV commercials (Fender and Gibson) aren't really starving for brand recognition. If you play guitar, you probably already know the Fender and Gibson brands at the very least. If you don't play guitar and you want to buy one, chances are when you go into a guitar store you're going to see a bunch of Fenders and Gibsons and the sales person is going to steer you towards those brands as well. With the way the guitar sales model works, there's not much of a reason to spend extra money on increasing brand recognition via TV.

 

Plus, guitars aren't like tampons or teeth whitening. There aren't many tampon forums where people spend hours a day talking about which brand is more absorbent, nor are there multiple magazines devoted entirely to which teeth whitening product is the best for your particular teeth. Because of how obsessed people tend to get with guitars, targeted advertising probably makes more financial sense. Why cast an expensive and wide net via TV commercials when you can spend a lot less money advertising directly to the people most likely to buy your products?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is not a half-bad idea.


Problem is, there are really only two ways for this to happen:


1. A hobbyist just does it with no industry support. You would have to buy A LOT of gear for the show to be worth following, bleeding money in hopes of eventually finding a way to build it into enough of a success that it could be ad-supported.


2. Somebody with industry connections gets their hands of lots of free gear for evaluation. The problem there, of course, is guitarists will take you a little less seriously, because even if you're not a shill, you'll come off as one. And honestly, even somebody who doesn't set out to be a shallow pitch-man will be awfully tempted to give glowing reviews to Devi Ever fuzz boxes if Devi herself is sending free loaners and being nice to them. It's almost impossible to maintain objectivity once you have even the shallowest of working relationships with the people you are reviewing, which is why Consumer Reports never accepts free samples or demos of anything.

 

 

I think the YouTube idea could work if, say, owners of the equipment being tested did the testing. Local online ads could be put out for free looking for folks to demo the gear that they own. Yes, there could be some hurdles, but I'm sure they could be overcame pretty quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Take it from someone who has worked as a media buyer (buying advertising, if you don't know what that means) for many years (ugh...too many): If you purchased television ads, your cost per 1,000 to reach such a small percentage of the public would be absolutely horrific and you'd find yourself looking for a new job within two weeks. National television advertising is the most expensive advertising you can buy. It's super effective because it reaches a huge audience IF you have a general interest product. Guitars are not a general interest product.


I'd love to see a Fender ad in the middle of an NFL game instead of another stupid Coors Light ad, but it's not going to happen.

 

but things like Doritos are owned by Bain Capitol which owns Guitar Center. They have the money. And as for spokespersons? Forget about it! Clapton, Hendrix, Elvis-the list is a whos who of pop culture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...