Jump to content

What do people think about bolt-on 24.75" scale guitars?


danswon

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Neck joints? Set-necks = fuller tone, longer sustain.(unless you crank up a strat and drive your amp into a little distortion, youll notice the lesser sustain compared to a set-neck) Bolt-on = stronger attack, quicker decay, punchier, more percussive sound. Is one better than the other? No. Its a preference (personal),

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Neck joint type really makes no difference to playability or sound. Many times, on non-fenders, it's a sign of a budget made guitar (because outside of fender style guitars, it doesn't seem to be done much other than on really low end guitars), but in practical terms, the joint itself makes no difference.

 

 

meresing wrote:

 

Neck joints? Set-necks = fuller tone, longer sustain.(unless you crank up a strat and drive your amp into a little distortion, youll notice the lesser sustain compared to a set-neck) Bolt-on = stronger attack, quicker decay, punchier, more percussive sound. Is one better than the other? No. Its a preference (personal),

 

 

This is the common wisdom we've all grown up with, I just don't find it to be true in any way. It's pure hype. If you think bolt on guitars sound punchier and more percussive it's likely because of the longer scale length that typically accompanies these guitar styles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...