Members DukeOfBoom Posted December 18, 2010 Author Members Share Posted December 18, 2010 You think it's your duty to weed out the "boners"? And you are quoting the DSM IV? What is your background as a psychologist to deduce such ideas? 1) Yes, it is one of my many duties. 2) Yes I am paraphrasing the DSM IV. 3) I have an IQ that's off the charts. My turn: Since when did singers become such an overly-sensitive whiny bunch of complainers? When I was a child, that was a time when men were men, and singers belted, coughed and crushed the opposition.[video=youtube;b4uahL_tQWc] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members staticsound Posted December 19, 2010 Members Share Posted December 19, 2010 Duchess hides under the anonymity of the internet. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black there compadre. Welcome back from your vacation {censored}tard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MusicalSchizo Posted December 19, 2010 Members Share Posted December 19, 2010 I love Henry Rollins, but calling Henry Rollins a singer is a stretch. Brian V. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members kool98769 Posted December 19, 2010 Members Share Posted December 19, 2010 For the record, usually when someone says they are "stuck in the body of...." it's referring to the thinking that they have the brain of the opposite. So like, this person with a dick has the mind of a female. It's not like they are confused, they know they have a dick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DukeOfBoom Posted December 19, 2010 Author Members Share Posted December 19, 2010 I love Henry Rollins, but calling Henry Rollins a singer is a stretch. Yes, I suppose demi-god would be a better title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DukeOfBoom Posted December 20, 2010 Author Members Share Posted December 20, 2010 damn if I could do that I could give myself my own BJs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chester_Hoss Posted December 20, 2010 Members Share Posted December 20, 2010 Garroted Dukedom HelloI am the DukeIf you are a crippled fat weak pigeon-sodomizing trannyYou are my next targetI have come from the Kangchenjunga mountains in NepalIn the horizon of the caverns of epithelial reflamainaryWhen I touch the teardrops of threaded wildebeastsYou can see that you now seeThrough the lacuna of space-time Into the sweaty crevasse of a buffalos gonadsWhen I touch the same aftershaveAs a hairless midgetYou are now transportedInto the realm of salivary gestationInto Santa Claus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DukeOfBoom Posted December 20, 2010 Author Members Share Posted December 20, 2010 You must be kidding, Weassely. I present you these exhibits of Alpha Males in the Animal Kingdom: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DukeOfBoom Posted December 20, 2010 Author Members Share Posted December 20, 2010 Garroted DukedomHelloI am the DukeIf you are a crippled fat weak pigeon-sodomizing trannyYou are my next targetI have come from the Kangchenjunga mountains in NepalIn the horizon of the caverns of epithelial reflamainaryWhen I touch the teardrops of threaded wildebeastsYou can see that you now seeThrough the lacuna of space-time Into the sweaty crevasse of a buffalos gonadsWhen I touch the same aftershaveAs a hairless midgetYou are now transportedInto the realm of salivary gestationInto SantaClaus Could use a little work, but I'm lovin the concept!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Masklin Posted December 20, 2010 Members Share Posted December 20, 2010 Your trolling is starting to disappoint me Weissey, you do the same thing over and over. Please bless us with your absence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members One Man Banned Posted January 2, 2011 Members Share Posted January 2, 2011 i could care less if someone is gay, but this transgender {censored} is bull{censored}. No, it's not. Grow up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chester_Hoss Posted January 3, 2011 Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Devi Ever Posted January 3, 2011 Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 When someone usually so strongly vocalizes against something, it usually speaks more to the issues of the person doing the vocalizing rather than the topic at hand. Also this is pretty amazing stuff in regards to vocal feminization : http://voicedoctor.net/media/cases/pitch/index.html It's too bad we can't hear any examples of someone who's been through the procedure as a vocalist. http://deviever.bandcamp.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Fender&EHX4ever Posted January 3, 2011 Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 No, it's not. Grow up. I think that's asking too much. Nothing to see in this thread. Move along folks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Devi Ever Posted January 3, 2011 Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 I think that's asking too much. Nothing to see in this thread. Move along folks. I dunno... the topic at hand is pretty interesting. Manipulating one's vocal chords (whether by surgery or practice) towards such drastic changes, the topic of tibetan monks comes to mind as well, is a pretty fascinating topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Fender&EHX4ever Posted January 3, 2011 Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 I dunno... the topic at hand is pretty interesting. Manipulating one's vocal chords (whether by surgery or practice) towards such drastic changes, the topic of tibetan monks comes to mind as well, is a pretty fascinating topic. If that's the direction this thread takes on, then carry on. But something about the OP tells me that is also asking too much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Devi Ever Posted January 3, 2011 Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 If that's the direction this thread takes on, then carry on. But something about the OP tells me that is also asking too much lol... he is banninated... lol.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DukeOfBoom Posted January 3, 2011 Author Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 Please fill in the blanks: The following two statements are factual:1) The Duke of Boom, Devi Ever, One Man Banned, and Fender4ever cannot all simultaneously be right.2) The Duke Of Boom is NEVER wrong. Therefore, the Duke of Boom is ________ and everyone else is _________. Thank you for your time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Shadowdusk Posted January 3, 2011 Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 Please fill in the blanks:The following two statements are factual:1) The Duke of Boom, Devi Ever, One Man Banned, and Fender4ever cannot all simultaneously be right.2) The Duke Of Boom is NEVER wrong.Therefore, the Duke of Boom is _Delusional_ and everyone else is _Relatively sane_.Thank you for your time. sorry, had to xD never say never man, never say never. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DukeOfBoom Posted January 3, 2011 Author Members Share Posted January 3, 2011 sorry, had to xD never say never man, never say never. Incorrect. Try again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.