Members wades_keys Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 That explains a lot.Exactly.Dawkins the atheist with a personal agenda.Fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 Incidentally, do you mock people who support the "theory" that the earth isn't flat? No, because there is evidence to support this conclusion. Stick to the subject, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members LanEvo Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 Yes, because it's so abundantly clear from the title of the book that the subject matter addresses the creation question. Fail. If you don't understand the connection between complexity and origin of life, then there's little point in discussing it further.You asked for references, I gave you one that addresses the specific question at hand. You look at the title and reject it outright before even trying to under stand it? That's what deserves a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members LanEvo Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 No, because there is evidence to support this conclusion.Ditto for evolution. If you refuse to accept the evidence for ideological reasons, that's your business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members #6 Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 This just in... way back when even fewer people believed the earth went around the sun! Polls always determine scientific truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members King Kashue Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 I agree with Darwin. I don't believe that a book 2000 years old can have any sort of answer to such issues. I agree... It's a good thing that the parts about the beginning of the world are around 3000 years old...That extra thousand years of marination is what makes the various flavors really kick once you put it on the grill...nice and spicy And, as we all know, whoever controls the spice, controls the universe... <_> >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members mlwarriner Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 Boring. Get real and stop thinking you're the only one with a clear vision of the truth.at last, something in this thread that i can 100% agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 If you don't understand the connection between complexity and origin of life, then there's little point in discussing it further. You've got to be {censored}ing kidding me.SO let's just say I'm the moron you've made me out to be.How about explaining this connection you speak of to all of the other posters here.In fact, why not explain this connection to the world at large - you might just win a Nobel Prize for your efforts.Fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 Ditto for evolution. If you refuse to accept the evidence for ideological reasons, that's your business. Circular logic. Stick to the topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 If you don't understand the connection between complexity and origin of life, then there's little point in discussing it further. LanEvo is GOD - he has all of the answers, but we are too stupid to understand, so they will have to revealed to the heathens in due time.FAIL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members LanEvo Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 you might just win a Nobel Prize for your efforts.Considering this is a well established idea, I don't see how anyone could get a Nobel Prize for it at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ModmanQ6 Posted February 12, 2009 Members Share Posted February 12, 2009 I enjoy a good read just like the next guy. Taking a book which was translated into english 500 years ago from stone tablets written in a different language with a 1500+ year old dialect, and has since been re-written into "plain english" in more than 100+ various editions which each differ slightly in the exact wording doesn't exactly give me the feeling of the ultimate truth... my 2cents of course.... YMMV.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 I honestly don't know what's going on here.I said the question of how was life created boils down to the question of complexity and how it originates. And everyone else is asking you to elaborate. Don't fall back on that jive-ass "Read a book" bull{censored}. You have read the book - you have presented yourself as the "expert" in this field; therefore it is incumbent on YOU to provide more details to support your claims. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and so far you have provided none. And that crystal formation thing - guess what, even I, the MORON, have seen and conducted that experiment, yet I don't see anyone making the leap from an observation of natural laws to the creation question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roger in the sky Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 The Gallup poll of 1,018 American adults ..... so they asked 1,018 people out of approximately 305,804,745yeah that's real reliable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 I said the question of how life was created boils down to the question of complexity and how it originates. Are you talking about the amino acids in the primordial ooze, stimulated by lightning and therefore leading to the formation of RNA? Yeah, that's pretty old news but stick to the topic - evolution vs. creation. They aren't mutually exclusive, as previously stated - apples and oranges my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members willsellout Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 And everyone else is asking you to elaborate. Don't fall back on that jive-ass "Read a book" bull{censored}. And that crystal formation thing - guess what, even I, the MORON, have seen and conducted that experiment, yet I don't see anyone making the leap from an observation of natural laws to the creation question.When and where did he refer to or even suggest that you are a moron? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jugghaid Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 Are you talking about the amino acids in the primordial ooze, stimulated by lightning and therefore leading to the formation of RNA?Yeah, that's pretty old news but stick to the topic - evolution vs. creation.They aren't mutually exclusive, as previously stated - apples and oranges my friend. As in.....who or what created the primordial ooze, or for that matter the universe in the first place? They are not mutually exclusive, becuase science does not have the answers to all of these questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members King Kashue Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 When and where did he refer to or even suggest that you are a moron? He didn't. As for the complexity of terrestrial life, here's a picture of a buffalo licking its own crotch... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members LanEvo Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 Are you talking about the amino acids in the primordial ooze, stimulated by lightning and therefore leading to the formation of RNA?No. I'm talking about how something like an amino acid itself forms. And how a molecule may catalyze its own production. RNA is already a highly complex organic molecule. It's very far down the line. Maybe we can take up this discussion after you cool out a bit. If you want serious answers, you'll have to stop with the cursing and other verbal abuse. This is a very interesting topic, but I'm not going to enter a debate with someone who is only interested in bullying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mr.Mow Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 When and where did he refer to or even suggest that you are a moron? Yeaaahhh!! Y'all {censored}ED now, the {censored}in' COASTGUARD is here bitches!!..dammit I'm bored today.. Please continue.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 When and where did he refer to or even suggest that you are a moron? Laugh all you want - that tactic is bull{censored}.HE's the expert - HE'S read the book - HE'S making claims.Why can't HE explain this subject better?He didn't have to say or suggest I'm a moron - I'm making that judgement myself.Note that I'm not the only one in this thread that has no idea where he is coming from.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bbl Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 so they asked 1,018 people out of approximately 305,804,745 yeah that's real reliable There's nothing wrong with that sample size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wades_keys Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 As in.....who or what created the primordial ooze, or for that matter the universe in the first place? They are not mutually exclusive, becuase science does not have the answers to all of these questions. BINGO!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bbl Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 He didn't have to say or suggest I'm a moron - I'm making that judgement myself.Can I sig that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jugghaid Posted February 13, 2009 Members Share Posted February 13, 2009 Can I sig that? Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.