Members agedhorse Posted December 10, 2010 Members Share Posted December 10, 2010 understood. what i meant is do you notice a difference now that we have all of this technology that has the potential to be mis-applied in a destructive manner as compared to the days when amps didn't do anything other than amplifyi guess back then the technology still existed in one form or another but was maybe not as available to those that would use it wrong Yes, when the unskilled masses who are educated beyond their intelligence get hold of technology, the damage is generally much more expensive and the methods of destruction much more efficient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members agedhorse Posted December 10, 2010 Members Share Posted December 10, 2010 splitting hairs probably, but I'd like to see a low-cut option of 40hz. Seems like it would be perfect for a lot of subs in the weekend warrior area. 40Hz would work well for that group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMS Author Craig Vecchione Posted December 10, 2010 CMS Author Share Posted December 10, 2010 Yes, when the unskilled masses who are educated beyond their intelligence get hold of technology, the damage is generally much more expensive and the methods of destruction much more efficient. And you don't get calls for something that isn't in the amp...no DSP means no calls because the DSP is confusing, or blowed up your subs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DaBender Posted December 16, 2010 Members Share Posted December 16, 2010 Yeah....I like that feature on my Yamaha PS5000 amps. I am sure that I can get by with a singular 100hz frequency as long as I am losing 11 lbs over a PS7000 at 26.5 lbs. Those new PV IPR series amps have the crossover on each channel AND only weigh 7 lbs. Seems like a win/win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.