Members estew72 Posted October 31, 2008 Members Share Posted October 31, 2008 I have a mark IV half stack right now. I love the sound- I have no reason to buy a Triaxis but buying new gear is so much fun who has experience with this preamp? what do you think? I'm kind of infatuated (also) with the idea of having a rack EQ... racks seem kind of sexy to me and what power amp do/have you used it with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members pezguy Posted October 31, 2008 Members Share Posted October 31, 2008 The Triaxis is a great preamp in some respects. It sound similar to the Mark IV however it wont do exactly what the Mark IV does and visa-versa. I used my Triaxis with with the Mesa 2:90 which allow you to remote swich the 1/2 drive, deep and modern modes on the 2:90. 1/2 drive lowers the headroom and changes the amp to a more squishy compressed feel. Deep extends the low end which you can truly feel when feeding a 4x12. The deep mode didn't work as well on open back cabs IMHO. My issue with the Triaxis was the interaction of the controls. There is a bit of a learning curve setting the gain, treble and dynamic voice controls as I recall. You might spend more time tweeking controls as opposed to playing which is what I DON"T want to do. You most likely would not need an rack EQ with this setup as most find it is not necessary. Best modes IMHO Rhythm 1 Yellow (Mark IV Clean), Lead 1 Green (Mark I Lead), and Lead 2 yellow (Mark IIC+). In version 2.0 they had the Lead 1 Red mode which is the Recto Mode. It didn't perform as advertised for me. That's about as much as I can summarize in 2 paragraphs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members -Juggernaut- Posted October 31, 2008 Members Share Posted October 31, 2008 http://acapella.harmony-central.com/forums/showpost.php?p=30854678&postcount=2Triaxis is a KILLER preamp, loved the one I had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Extasyguy Posted October 31, 2008 Members Share Posted October 31, 2008 See sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Awake77 Posted October 31, 2008 Members Share Posted October 31, 2008 You also might want to look into a Randall RM4, unless the Mark series tone is exactly what you're looking for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wolfspider Posted October 31, 2008 Members Share Posted October 31, 2008 I owned one for a little while and i never liked, then i bought a MKIV and it was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jakem Posted October 31, 2008 Members Share Posted October 31, 2008 The Triaxis is a great preamp in some respects. It sound similar to the Mark IV however it wont do exactly what the Mark IV does and visa-versa. I used my Triaxis with with the Mesa 2:90 which allow you to remote swich the 1/2 drive, deep and modern modes on the 2:90. 1/2 drive lowers the headroom and changes the amp to a more squishy compressed feel. Deep extends the low end which you can truly feel when feeding a 4x12. The deep mode didn't work as well on open back cabs IMHO. My issue with the Triaxis was the interaction of the controls. There is a bit of a learning curve setting the gain, treble and dynamic voice controls as I recall. You might spend more time tweeking controls as opposed to playing which is what I DON"T want to do. You most likely would not need an rack EQ with this setup as most find it is not necessary. Best modes IMHO Rhythm 1 Yellow (Mark IV Clean), Lead 1 Green (Mark I Lead), and Lead 2 yellow (Mark IIC+). In version 2.0 they had the Lead 1 Red mode which is the Recto Mode. It didn't perform as advertised for me. That's about as much as I can summarize in 2 paragraphs. This kinda sums it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members guitarbilly74 Posted October 31, 2008 Members Share Posted October 31, 2008 I probably will get flamed for saying this, but tone-wise the TriAxis is step down from any Mark series amp. I love the versatility but the tone is not as good IMHO. And yes I owned one for 2 years, with a 2:90. My Mark III smoked that rig every time. It's sad because I REALLY wanted to like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.