Jump to content

Blackstar HT50?


t-rey

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Been wasting time this morning instead of grading papers and just saw the Blackstar HT-50 heads.

 

I have an HT-5 that I really love, but was curious about the 50. How similar are the bigger HT amps to the 5w? Are they 'hybrid' amps like the HT-5 or is it all toob? Does it take pedals (especially boosts) better/worse than the HT-5?

 

Basically I'm just bored, so I've been scheming on selling my amps and cabs and going with an HT-50 and an Emperor 2x12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The HT-5 was what originally caused me to buy the HT-60. They do have the same voicing but there are a lot more options with the bigger versions. The bigger versions do use some solid state clipping but they have EL34 power sections and sound awesome at just about any volume. I run a clean boost as well as a tubescreamer clone in front of mine and and they sound great. They have a great loop as well. If you like the HT5 you will like the bigger ones :thu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is good news for me and bad news for my wallet. I like the basic voicing of my ht5 a lot, but wish it sounded bigger and had more low end - seems like the 50 does those things, plus having a decent clean channel.

 

When you say it sounds good at any volume, are you talking sounds good at house volumes without an attenuator without being all flubby and muddy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was torn between a Club 50 and a Stage 60 for a while. Settled on the Stage 60 combo for separate EQ, three channels, and 2 celestions in the box. I've used all of the channels in the past week with rehearsals and performances. The OCD works great on both the clean and OD1 channels. OD2 doesn't need any help with gain. Love it all. Amp sounds great on its own, and surprisingly good using the speaker emulator to the PA.

 

It's good stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

This is good news for me and bad news for my wallet. I like the basic voicing of my ht5 a lot, but wish it sounded bigger and had more low end - seems like the 50 does those things, plus having a decent clean channel.


When you say it sounds good at any volume, are you talking sounds good at house volumes without an attenuator without being all flubby and muddy?

 

 

it sounds really good at bedroom volumes. I play mine a good bit at low volume and dont mind it at all. Like X-Jester said, the emulated out works great too. I use it to record guitar right to my laptop at practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I bought my HT-40 after having my HT-5 for a few months. Best. Decision. EVER. If you want teh br00tz, I'd recommend Blackstar's DistX pedal.

 

I feel the same way. I had the HT-5, bought the Stage 60 and then bought the HT-20 for smaller gigs and recording :lol: My band mate bought the HT-40 after playing my Stage 60. So between both of us we have a whole pile of Blackstars :love:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sounds good. I don't really need the third channel, since I will most likely have it set up like my HT5 - mid gain then boost it for heavier stuff. I wish I could check one out locally so I could see if I would still want/need my JCA22h as well or just go with the Blackstar.

 

How does the master volume work? Is it like the 'attenuator' control on the Thunderverb amps, or something different?

 

And is the 40 or 60 significantly louder than the 20?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Sounds good. I don't really need the third channel, since I will most likely have it set up like my HT5 - mid gain then boost it for heavier stuff. I wish I could check one out locally so I could see if I would still want/need my JCA22h as well or just go with the Blackstar.


How does the master volume work? Is it like the 'attenuator' control on the Thunderverb amps, or something different?


And is the 40 or 60 significantly louder than the 20?

 

 

I dont care for the 3rd channel on mine to be honest, I use OD1 for everything and boost it if I need more. OD2 is just too compressed sounding to me. Not sure about the master volume on it, someone else might be able to answer that for you. The 20 watter is plenty loud enough if it is miced through the PA, it doesnt have as much bottom end as the bigger ones though and the 60 watter is a good bit louder and has more clean headroom at higher volumes, but that is to be expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my experience to date, master volume works like most other master volume amps. Basically, you can't really crank up the gain and channel volumes because the master volume has about 0.5 degrees of turn between fizz and egregiously loud.

 

Also, no, I don't think it's "significantly" louder. Just more clean headroom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

In my experience to date, master volume works like most other master volume amps. Basically, you can't really crank up the gain and channel volumes because the master volume has about 0.5 degrees of turn between fizz and egregiously loud.


Also, no, I don't think it's "significantly" louder. Just more clean headroom.

 

 

How loud are you running the channel volumes? I like to run my master at 12 o clock and run the channel volumes lower. It sounds much better to my ears this way and the volume is easier to control. Also, an EQ in the loop helps get the volume down to bedroom levels while keeping good tone. I never touch the volume controls on my amp, I use the EQ for that. Works awesome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

How loud are you running the channel volumes? I like to run my master at 12 o clock and run the channel volumes lower. It sounds much better to my ears this way and the volume is easier to control. Also, an EQ in the loop helps get the volume down to bedroom levels while keeping good tone. I never touch the volume controls on my amp, I use the EQ for that. Works awesome!

 

 

Because I'm using the speaker emulated outs, I had to set the clean channel volume to an appropriate amount of gain and calibrate the PA level to match. Then I tweaked OD1 and OD2 to match it in terms of volume. As you mentioned, I do minor overall volume tweaking and tone refinement with my MXR 10-band in the loop. I run the amp on standby when playing with the band. But at these levels (I'd say the clean channel is at about 11 o'clock, with OD1 volume around 10 o'clock and OD2 volume around 8:45 if memory serves), you don't get much room with the master volume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

after stumbling onto this and checking out the youtube vids...... blackstar looks to be on my want list. As publicized in other threads, I've been on the search for the perfect combo something Marshall-ish on the drive channels and fender-ish on the clean. Looks like the HT60 would be cool as it's got the two drive channels for mid and higher gains... or would the HT40 with an overdrive pedal on the clean channel work just as well? I've got a bunch of overdrive pedals......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

after stumbling onto this and checking out the youtube vids...... blackstar looks to be on my want list. As publicized in other threads, I've been on the search for the perfect combo something Marshall-ish on the drive channels and fender-ish on the clean. Looks like the HT60 would be cool as it's got the two drive channels for mid and higher gains... or would the HT40 with an overdrive pedal on the clean channel work just as well? I've got a bunch of overdrive pedals......

 

 

The HT-40 can do everything the 60 can do. If you have OD pedals you will be able to cover everything from clean to high gain no problem. My bandmate has the 40 and I have played through it a good bit. I almost wish I would have bought it instead of the 60.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

probably wouldn't use the drive channel w/pedals. I'd use a couple of different overdrives for those hard to find 'mid gain' sounds, on the clean channel, save the drive channel for heavier marshall-ish leads... wonder about the extra headroom and spread of two speakers vs one speaker (ht60 vs ht40)....

 

wish my local GC would stock these...all they have is a HT5 head that doesn't work (it's been there for a couple of years I think)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Members

 

HT-50 is awesome, its not as loud (noticeably) as its 100watt brother but sounds like it has the same voicing. A mate of mine bought the ENGL FB100 and the HT-50 eats it alive on stage.

 

 

How are the cleans on the 50? I noticed it only has one tone control like the HT40. I think the 60 and 100 have Bass/Treble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The HT-40 can do everything the 60 can do. If you have OD pedals you will be able to cover everything from clean to high gain no problem. My bandmate has the 40 and I have played through it a good bit. I almost wish I would have bought it instead of the 60.

 

 

I almost wish I would have bought it instead of the 60

Why would you say that???

 

I'm thinking about the Solist 60. I don't care about the 3rd channel, I do care about the weight. The Solist actually weighs a few pounds less than the HT40 combo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

HT-50 is awesome, its not as loud (noticeably) as its 100watt brother but sounds like it has the same voicing. A mate of mine bought the ENGL FB100 and the HT-50 eats it alive on stage.

 

 

Does he use a boost?

 

Just wondering..I don't really care for the HT-20 bootz. And its basically the same amp..Just higher wattage right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...