Members BOOGIE666 Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 His hands and feet should be chained to his waste and he should be wearing a ornage jump suit just like every other mass murder does when they attend trial.Why should this scum bag be treated any better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BOOGIE666 Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 This just in.......FDR on trial for "illegal" invasion of Germany and Japan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members murch33 Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by BOOGIE666 His hands and feet should be chained to his waste and he should be wearing a ornage jump suit just like every other mass murder does when they attend trial. Why should this scum bag be treated any better? "Normal" mass murderers are restrained because they're possibly a physical threat. What's Saddam going to do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Dark Angel Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by murch33 "Normal" mass murderers are restrained because they're possibly a physical threat. What's Saddam going to do? Well, he could release a chemical weapon in the general direction of the jury, so I think he should be placed in an orange plastic suit that is air-tight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members fuleiragem Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by vlad I'm not going to get involved in this {censored}storm extensively... Let me just say this... International law is something that countries are NOT obliged to subscribe to. I see your point...everybody must comply, except USA. clever, clever... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BOOGIE666 Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 you mean like when Sadam "illegally" invaded Kuwaitt, or when he "legally" under Iraq's at that time law killed thousands of kurds?It was Germany's legal law to kill Jews, and it was "illegal" for the U.S. to invade germany too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members OverDriven Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by fuleiragem I see your point...everybody must comply, except USA. clever, clever... So which is it....Canada or France?-Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members fuleiragem Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by OverDriven So which is it....Canada or France? -Joe neither. guess again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DerekB Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by OverDriven So which is it....Canada or France? -Joe Derek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Negative K3 fan Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by BOOGIE666 It was Germany's legal law to kill Jews, and it was "illegal" for the U.S. to invade germany too. to start with, international laws were not as advanced as they are now (or when iraq was invaded), and second the us had declared war to germany before they invaded it, that made the invasion more or less legal.we're talking about different kinds of legal or illegal right now, but i guess i see your point, but maybe you should choose your 'phrasing' a little different next time you're trying to explain what you mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Negative K3 fan Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by cobrahead1030 i think the world will be a better place with saddam out of power i dont think anyone with enough common sence wouldnt agree, but there are many roads leading to rome and in matters like this it is crucial to look at which roads makes the juice worth the squeeze and select the best out of them, it can be debated if that has been done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MTDP8350 Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 That guy is a {censored}ing baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RonniePentatonic Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by fuleiragem I see your and raise you one and a Dumdiddydumdumdiddydum.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members fuleiragem Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by RonniePentatonic I see your and raise you one and a Dumdiddydumdumdiddydum.... you're hurting my feelings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Marshall Freak Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by Negative K3 fan to start with, international laws were not as advanced as they are now (or when iraq was invaded), and second the us had declared war to germany before they invaded it, that made the invasion more or less legal. we're talking about different kinds of legal or illegal right now, but i guess i see your point, but maybe you should choose your 'phrasing' a little different next time you're trying to explain what you mean. We also declared war on Iraq, back in '91, then a cease fire was put in place. Then Iraq defied the orders of the cease fire, so we went back in. 100% legal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members OverDriven Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by MTDP8350 That guy is a {censored}ing baby. Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RickStar Posted February 13, 2006 Members Share Posted February 13, 2006 Originally posted by the russ yeah 'cause Canada and France are the only two we've alienated ourselves from illegal says who. who is the country or whatever that said it was illegal. who france. {censored} the french and screw this piece of {censored}. put a bullet in him. i'll even donate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cobrahead1030 Posted February 14, 2006 Members Share Posted February 14, 2006 Originally posted by Negative K3 fan i dont think anyone with enough common sence wouldnt agree, but there are many roads leading to rome and in matters like this it is crucial to look at which roads makes the juice worth the squeeze and select the best out of them, it can be debated if that has been done. i could agree with that...i just think that it's ridiculous to see so many people pointing fingers and playing the blame game, when we've got such intense work to complete in iraq and afghanistan...and iran posing itself as a larger threat each dayeveryone is too busy chasing their tails in dc, and trying to win over public opinion...when they should be working WITH the president (whether they support him or not) and stop trying to deny the fact that he is the one in power, and not them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Negative K3 fan Posted February 14, 2006 Members Share Posted February 14, 2006 and that is not how a democracy is supposed to work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.