Jump to content

Ever wonder how nimble an F-18 is?


Axe_34

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
The Phantom gathered a number of nicknames during its career. Some of these names included "Rhino", "Double Ugly",[106] the "Flying Anvil", "Flying Footlocker", "Flying Brick", "Lead Sled", the "Big Iron Sled" and the "St. Louis Slugger".[107] In recognition of its record of downing large numbers of Soviet-built MiGs,[108] it was called the "World

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Love the F-4. Definitely baddass.

 

But here's the king of baddassness

 

A-10_Thunderbolt_II_In-flight-2.jpg

 

Followed closely by the Grim {censored}ing Reaper -- no wonder the guy sounds freaked out in Call of Duty when he screams out "AC130 above!!" Nowhere to hide.

 

AC-130H_Spectre_jettisons_flares.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Hard to believe it's a 30+ year old design. The F22 is marginally better but waaaay over budget. The Navy got it's money's worth with the F/A18


Holy cow!!!!! Talk about revisionist history. The FA18 was wayyyyyyy over budget and way behind schedule in its own time. Short range + abysmal weapons loading = budgetary waste. Yeah there have been a few revisions to the platform but it earned its label as the plane that "couldn't go anywhere and couldn't do anything when it got there". Sure we'll pump it up as much as we can because we are stuck with it but that plane was flawed from the get go.

And just one note on all that vitriol...this is coming from someone that has worked for the Navy in one way another for 30 years.

Don't get me started on the fail that is Lockheed Martin though...but to hold the FA18 up as an ideal model of procurement vs the F22 is :facepalm::lol::facepalm::lol::facepalm::facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great vid..thank you!

Count me in with those who are fascinated with flyers, especially the big ones. Even a big commercial jet on approach is like :freak: how can that be?

I used to think the A10 was the dumbest flyer ever. Then I saw it in action. Not only is the ordinance astounding (that cannon {censored}! :eek: )....but it's flight abilities will {censored} you bricks. It can "come about" for another pass before you're done {censored}ting. It did a full 360...in the infield of the landing strip. An awesome bird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hell's yeah! :rawk: A10 and AC/DC :rawk:

 

 

Some really good clips showing how tight it can bank after an attack run. Love it when it lights up the nose cannon -- smoke starts trailing.

 

The GAU-8/A Avenger itself weighs 620 pounds (280 kg), but the complete weapon, with feed system and drum, weighs 4,029 pounds (1,828 kg) with a maximum ammunition load. It measures 19 ft 5 1?2 in (5.931 m) from the muzzle to the rearmost point of the ammunition system, and the ammunition drum alone is 34.5 inches (88 cm) in diameter and 71.5 inches (1.82 m) long. Power for operating the gun is provided by twin 77 hp electric motors. The magazine can hold 1,174 rounds, although 1,150 is the typical load-out. Muzzle velocity when firing Armor-Piercing Incendiary rounds is 3,250 feet per second (990 m/s), almost the same as the substantially lighter M61 Vulcan's 20 mm round.


The standard ammunition mixture for anti-armor use is a four-to-one mix of PGU-14/B Armor Piercing Incendiary, with a projectile weight of about 15.0 oz (425 grams or 6,560 grains) and PGU-13/B High Explosive Incendiary (HEI) rounds, with a projectile weight of about 12.7 oz (360 grams or 5,556.25 grains). The PGU-14/B's projectile incorporates a lightweight aluminum body, cast around a smaller caliber depleted uranium penetrating core. The Avenger is lethal against tanks and all other armored vehicles.


The Avenger's rate of fire was originally selectable, 2,100 rounds per minute (rpm) in the low setting, or 4,200 rpm in the high setting. Later this was changed to a fixed rate of 3,900 rpm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...