Jump to content

X2N or Tone Zone?


Crisco

Recommended Posts

  • Members

For my Firebird Studio I am trying to decide between the Tone Zone or X2N for the bridge, and I have pretty much decided on a PAF Pro for the neck.

Anybody here have any use of these in their guitars?

You Tube videos are helpful but only so much.

Amp is the Solid State

Marshall MG HDFX 100

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I disagree. The Tone Zone sounds most excellent in my Fender Custom Telecaster Special. (Mahogany).

 

Guitars010.jpgGuitars009.jpg

Air Norton in the neck and TZ in the bridge. Stock

 

It sounds very nice clean and is very phat when you pour on the brootalz.

 

I haven't tried the X2N, but I gather it's more mid than the TZ with the ceramic tone. The TZ is an Alnico V IIRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have an X2N and I'm on the fence about it. I have a really hard time getting some proper tones out of it in POD Farm, whereas I can get all sorts of different metal tones no problem with my EMG 81.

 

I like the EMG because the tone is more compressed and under control, yet still very high-gain. The X2N is very mid-heavy and it has a tendancy to sound muddy and undefined. I did manage to get a good tone when I had a JCM2000/DSL401 and Boss Metal Zone, but I think that's the only time it sounded any good.

 

An 81 or an 85 would be a good alternative...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...