Jump to content

DSI mono vs. poly evolver sequencers...


sleepykeith

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

The PolyEvolvers can do everything a mono Evolver can do, but with 4 voices of polyphony. I'm sure you've discovered how to make the monoevolver seem polyphonic by manipulating the oscillators independently -- the polyevolvers let you do that with 4 times as many oscillators, basically.

 

 

 

so you can make some pretty complex rhythms then... rad, i should start saving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

"I have no clue on this but
". As Bill Bailey would say, ''speaking as a mother".


B>

 

 

OO, you seem like a "cool..." guy, so if i may offer a little advice:

it would help your credibility immensly to think a bit before you post :idea:

# of posts do not equal cred. helpfulness does :cop:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

so you can make some pretty complex rhythms then... rad, i should start saving.

 

 

You should keep in mind (depending on how you like to work) that the polyevolver has been intentionally limited in its multimbral capabilities. Yes - you can work with 4 different sounds, and set up an individual sequence for both (as if you had 4 monoevolvovers), HOWEVER - you cannot save any of the individual patch information. So - you could spend 4 hours setting up a complex multimbral sequencing patch, but as soon as you hit save, it's gone forever. I've heard that 1 or both of the editors allows you to accomplish this, but I cannot verify it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ive never really used the evolver in combo mode except to have 1 voice running a sequence while the other 3 voices were 'melody' that I played over the top, so I cant really comment on drools' information.

 

honestly, I dont use the PEK's sequencers that much. Mosty, I focus on just creating wonderfully playable patches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OO, you seem like a "cool..." guy, so if i may offer a little advice:

it would help your credibility immensly to
think a bit
before you post
:idea:
# of posts do not equal cred. helpfulness does
:cop:

 

Well, I've thought about it, and your reply is still idiotic. Offering vaguely threatening opinions having already claimed cluelessness is what you consider helpful is it? You're going to find an internet full of helpfulness then.

 

B>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...