Guest Anonymous Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 the guidelines will stand or fail whether you're around to assert them or not. shame is irrelevant; if you were as honest as you purport to be, then you would have backed down not from shame {hey, we all {censored} up from time to time}, but because you were wrong well before chip disabused you of your faulty assumptions. you've derailed meaningful discourse and failed spectacularly to spin your behaviour as a demonstration of personal integrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Real MC Posted December 2, 2005 Members Share Posted December 2, 2005 Originally posted by niall the guidelines will stand or fail whether you're around to assert them or not. shame is irrelevant; if you were as honest as you purport to be, then you would have backed down not from shame {hey, we all {censored} up from time to time}, but because you were wrong well before chip disabused you of your faulty assumptions. you've derailed meaningful discourse and failed spectacularly to spin your behaviour as a demonstration of personal integrity. You dare accuse ME of derailing meaningful discourse? I don't need your lectures on how I spin personal integrity when myteeGTi makes a mockery out of moderation and derails meaningful discourse by spewing flamebait. Twisting my words to fit the definition of trolling is not going to work. That's manipulation. I was a victim of a manipulator, I know all the tricks. As I warned myteeGTi, I know the type very well. You cannot trap me. You claim shame is irrelevant - yet your post reads "but you didn't do that - nice one." I know an attempt to shame someone into submission when I see one, and they don't come any greater than this. This "meaningful discourse" would have carried on if you had left my apology alone, wouldn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Anonymous Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 {censored}, did i fall for another ADSR prank? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members aeon Posted December 2, 2005 Members Share Posted December 2, 2005 no, niall, you did not. but that said, it is amazing how fitting some avatars are, no? cheerio! Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ahfinn Posted December 2, 2005 Members Share Posted December 2, 2005 How were guidlines overlooked if it wasn't even his auction? That would mean all these GX-1 posts are against guidelines as well. jeesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Anonymous Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 yeah, beeker and the bat{censored} craziness made it all too awful to be real. i guess it's even worse now. i wish i had the dosh to throw around for that sonic V. i've never even seen one up close {but like reid's article about the sonic six muchly}. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ahfinn Posted December 2, 2005 Members Share Posted December 2, 2005 I just traded my Sonic Six. Hopefully I won't regret it sometime in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Anonymous Posted December 2, 2005 Share Posted December 2, 2005 oo. "Early Sonic 6s retained Zumcheck's diode ladder filter, but serial numbers above 1264 incorporated Moog's transistor ladder." which did you have, ahfinn? if it was one of the early ones, can you describe the filter's sound? thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members mytee2.0 Posted December 2, 2005 Members Share Posted December 2, 2005 Originally posted by The Real MC You dare accuse ME of derailing meaningful discourse? well, if you werent so pissy "Read the Guidelines before you come here fishing for bidders.", none of this would have happend. Now would it? Originally posted by The Real MC I don't need your lectures on how I spin personal integrity when myteeGTi makes a mockery out of moderation and derails meaningful discourse by spewing flamebait. WEEE!!! You used my favorite word. "mockery" and I didnt derail anything. If I did many people here would have pointed it out. Did you notice that no one came to your defense? Originally posted by The Real MC Twisting my words to fit the definition of trolling is not going to work. That's manipulation. I was a victim of a manipulator, I know all the tricks. As I warned myteeGTi, I know the type very well. You cannot trap me. I manipulated you? SWEET!!!! alright well im done, time for crispy duck and wontons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Real MC Posted December 2, 2005 Members Share Posted December 2, 2005 Sonic Six is an interesting noise and FX machine, doesn't sound at all like a Minimoog. It was Bob's personal favorite, his choice machine for clinics and lectures. I have an early 80s Keyboard mag where he wrote a column article about a concert he performed in, using the Sonic Six. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ahfinn Posted December 2, 2005 Members Share Posted December 2, 2005 Originally posted by niall which did you have, ahfinn? if it was one of the early ones, can you describe the filter's sound? I had serial number 1004, with the old filter. I wasn't a huge fan of it. I've been told that it sounds a bit like an EMS filter. I didn't thnk it had much kick to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.