Members hangwire Posted July 23, 2010 Members Share Posted July 23, 2010 so how is the phaser in the new EHX worm compared to small stone thickness? is there any difference between the phaser in the older and newer models? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ponch Posted July 23, 2010 Members Share Posted July 23, 2010 i have the smaller xo model, i dont use the phaser that much, but its ok. however i havnt used a small stone. the older models apparenty are more warbbly and more noisy from what ive heard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Fender&EHX4ever Posted July 23, 2010 Members Share Posted July 23, 2010 is there any difference between the phaser in the older and newer models? The newer model fixed the noise issues and has an expression input. I kept my older box, but that's mostly because I'm a sucker for the discontinued stuff. But practically speaking, the XO is more friendly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hangwire Posted July 23, 2010 Author Members Share Posted July 23, 2010 i was looking to see if it would replace my small stone if the modulated wah could pull a close Diamond Sea into tone... but looks like no on both counts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members blingdogg Posted July 23, 2010 Members Share Posted July 23, 2010 I have a Worm XO (never tried the original big box), and it's a nice pedal. The phaser sounds more like a univibe to me though... so if you like univibe sounds, it will be great. But if you want a more traditional sounding phaser, get the Small Stone. The phaser's my favorite setting on the Worm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.