Members Sick Michael Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb Btw Mike - I still think that putting it back to a 2204 (with reversable mods for more gain/meat), but keeping it as original as possible (with the board) would be the best for this amp - why? In a couple of years amps like this will easily cross the value line of 1000 Euros Looking at the prices you have to pay for unmodded JMPs lately, the only direction is UP. Thats cool. Im not really that bothered to be honest and I think you should just do what you think is best. What Im really just looking for is something just like that typical Marshall tone, but with more meat, and maybe some of that nice Diezel style depth with the power amp. I will be using a pedal with it so completely over the top distortion is not that necessary, and I would like it to be as reactive as possible with the guitars volume knob. Oh yeah, and a loop!!Im asking too much, I know.....Remember, time is not an issue. Experiment all you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 I haven't started yet The not so pleasing result with Alex' 50 Watter (the DK) has made me think a lot more about certain details I didn't had to deal with before. Marks amp is easier - stock Plexi PTP and a cap or two, cause he's such a gain whore We will see. I will put yours back to full stock, do the standard mods, some Cameron (and a loop), record a clip and two - and we will see further then - and then ask Peter :D:DBtw: what are you going to put into that loop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Big Hair Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb Yup. Filters, they need urgently a change - in yours and Mikes. LOL - I like that - urgently need a change! They must have been bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sick Michael Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb I haven't started yet The not so pleasing result with Alex' 50 Watter (the DK) has made me think a lot more about certain details I didn't had to deal with before. Marks amp is easier - stock Plexi PTP and a cap or two, cause he's such a gain whore We will see. I will put yours back to full stock, do the standard mods, some Cameron (and a loop), record a clip and two - and we will see further then - and then ask Peter :D:D Btw: what are you going to put into that loop? woohoo! Cant wait!! Those Cameron modded Marshalls sound awesome!Im quite excited! The loop is for the GMajor, and maybe the MB Quad. Who knows, maybe I wont have use for the quad after all this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Big Hair LOL - I like that - urgently need a change! They must have been bad The thing with your amp is, that I have to uninstall all (all!) parts and make a decorrosion thing - its completely corroded everywhere . . . even in the inside. Was that amp lying for a couple of years in the river thames? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Sick Michael Im quite excited! We'll see . . . Which crunch (just that) do you preferhttp://www.thinlizzy.de/dksecond.mp3http://www.thinlizzy.de/dk3rd.mp3Not that there are any C-mods made here, its not a Marshall (just lookwise), but the character gives you an idea, Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 None Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 before: see first postafter:LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mr 5150 Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb before: see first post after: LOL :eek: :eek: His foot{censored}ch must be the width of the stage!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JPOM Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 that looks cool!I hope I could do mods easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Big Hair Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Olaf - is that Mikes amp?? It looks like my Cameron!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 LOL - no, thats a modded to death 800s posted on ebay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sick Michael Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb We'll see . . . Which crunch (just that) do you prefer http://www.thinlizzy.de/dksecond.mp3http://www.thinlizzy.de/dk3rd.mp3Not that there are any C-mods made here, its not a Marshall (just lookwise), but the character gives you an idea, Mike dk3rd would be my preference here, but both sound really good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Big Hair Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb LOL - no, thats a modded to death 800s posted on ebay. one day I will dare to open up my cameron and see what has been done inside....not that I will understand, just interesting to look and gaze at it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sick Michael Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Olaf, if we're just going for the single channel option then I think just the crunch channel instead of the lead channel would be the preference. (I'll be using a pedal). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Sick Michael dk3rd would be my preference here, but both sound really good! Cool. The difference between both is the way how to get "deep" into it (but I wasn't after a DM rythm when recording - the fx is about 20% of what can be dialed in ). Gainwise thats about 60% of what is reasonable with 3 gainstages. Do you need/want more gain that lets say these 60% (which have 40% "headroom")?I'm not happy with the lead sound, thats why I didn't send the amp to Alex . . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Big Hair one day I will dare to open up my cameron and see what has been done inside....not that I will understand, just interesting to look and gaze at it Yeah, but don't post it, Mark - to be fair to Cameron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Sick Michael Olaf, if we're just going for the single channel option then I think just the crunch channel instead of the lead channel would be the preference. (I'll be using a pedal). Maybe I will install a manual switch to go between 3 and 4 gainstages (Peter suggested that - that gives you the option). Alex f.i. likes my 4 gainstage-stuff with the gainpot set to 35-45% for rythms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Those clips are thru emulators btw, not speakers . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sick Michael Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb Cool. The difference between both is the way how to get "deep" into it (but I wasn't after a DM rythm when recording - the fx is about 20% of what can be dialed in ). Gainwise thats about 60% of what is reasonable with 3 gainstages. Do you need/want more gain that lets say these 60% (which have 40% "headroom")? I'm not happy with the lead sound, thats why I didn't send the amp to Alex . . . . No, I think the gain level on that is fine. Maybe a tiny bit more, but not much. The swtich might be nice. If it doesnt take anything away from the amp, then it could be a good inclusion. So long as the amp cleans up nicely I dont mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Big Hair Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb Yeah, but don't post it, Mark - to be fair to Cameron. No, of course not. I don't think it is fair to post someone elses designs like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Duesentrieb Posted February 10, 2006 Author Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 I didn't know that I have to build in a cleaner too :D:DWe will tweak it over the phone, Mike, in a couple of days/weeks. Of course its much easier you get your popo into a train and we tweak it on the fly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Sick Michael Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Originally posted by Duesentrieb I didn't know that I have to build in a cleaner too :D:D We will tweak it over the phone, Mike, in a couple of days/weeks. Of course its much easier you get your popo into a train and we tweak it on the fly my popo!! lol.....well you know, Im old fasioned....cleaners are a good thing....Take your time with it, theres no rush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members argonaut4 Posted February 10, 2006 Members Share Posted February 10, 2006 Hey Olaf!Nice office pics. I just have stupid things in my office. Now my mad scientist laboratory at home is a different story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Knut E Evenmo Posted February 11, 2006 Members Share Posted February 11, 2006 Originally posted by Sick Michael Who knows, maybe I wont have use for the quad after all this.... Then you know what to do with it;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.