Jump to content

Emperador or Gibson


cheeky_m0nkeys

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Hey everyone,

 

I'm looking to buy an acoustic (previous one damaged in an accident), and am having some trouble coming down to a final decision.

 

Currently Im looking at a Gibson Hummingbird, and an Emperador 57-12801 a friend of mine is getting rid of (though in pristine condition).

 

I've held and played each, and both sound and feel really great. I like to try my hand at most styles of music (country, blues, folk, classic rock, jazz, etc.) but I guess I tend to do classic rock and blues more than anything-- though im starting to get into fingerpicking and sliding a lot more as well now (and will probably be looking to expand on that).

 

My main question is: Which would be the better option to go with?

 

I've read reviews of both guitars and both have received fairly high ratings across the board. I'll admit I have some trepadation towards the Emperador due to legal history and the company now being gone.

 

Any suggestions or advice or thoughts would be very much appreciated.

 

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Hummingbird is going to be a much better instrument, unless someone has driven a HumVee over it... :eek:

 

Seriously, the Emperador line is made up of laminated body knock-offs of other (better) brands of instruments...if you can get it for $50 to $75, it might make a really nice "beater", but the Gibson is "quality".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I used to have an Emperador acoustic. I bought it at a local pawn shop for

$60 about 20 years ago. It was a nice guitar for the money. I ended up

giving it to a friend that plays bass, and wanted to try his hand at the

acoustic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...