Members JcKerr Posted September 10, 2005 Members Share Posted September 10, 2005 Was wondering about my setup... i have really good cords, but i've got 2 twenty some foot cords... one to the stopbox then another to the amp... is that really bad or what... i could get by with alot shorter cords, but would it make any difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GAS Man Posted September 10, 2005 Members Share Posted September 10, 2005 Originally posted by JcKerr Was wondering about my setup... i have really good cords, but i've got 2 twenty some foot cords... one to the stopbox then another to the amp... is that really bad or what... i could get by with alot shorter cords, but would it make any difference? I don't know. But reminds me of a story.I've got one old coil cord that makes a guitar sound like {censored}. I don't know how to explain it, but it makes the tone lose definition.It's orange and has one 90 degree plug. I can' t bring myself to throw it away, but I never use it.Moral of the story,Use your ears.Quality s/b more important than length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members aero90 Posted September 10, 2005 Members Share Posted September 10, 2005 I would agree that quality is more important than length, but length does have an effect. Cable capacitance increases by the foot, and higher capacitance cables cause a downward shift in the resonance frequency of the circuit, resulting in a warmer sound or reduced highs. I would borrow a friends cables to try and see if you can hear a difference before investing in new ones, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JcKerr Posted September 10, 2005 Author Members Share Posted September 10, 2005 They are good cords.. hot line.. they are all have gold plated connectors.. i've seen them on e-bay and are expensive.. they were a gift .... i guess they're fine! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jerry_picker Posted September 10, 2005 Members Share Posted September 10, 2005 In the old days, there was this big argument about straight cords vs. coiled "telephone" cords. Something about the coiled wire made an "induction coil" that was supposed to filter out unwanted noise signal (or something).Mick Taylor used coiled cords when he was with the Stones:I think that the bottom lines are:1. Good quality braided wire with coaxial ground braid.2. Solid solder connections to the plugs.3. Durable, flexible coating on the wire.4. Strong, crack-resistant housings on plugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members angus_old Posted September 10, 2005 Members Share Posted September 10, 2005 Originally posted by jerry_picker In the old days, there was this big argument about straight cords vs. coiled "telephone" cords. Something about the coiled wire made an "induction coil" that was supposed to filter out unwanted noise signal (or something). Mick Taylor used coiled cords when he was with the Stones: So did JimiI think it was also supposed to kill some of the highs and make the strat less bright/twangy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members TattooedCarrot Posted September 10, 2005 Members Share Posted September 10, 2005 With hi-impedence pickups (passives) you will lose a little signal clarity and high end with very long cords. Not so the case with low impedence like EMG's. A large signal chain can do the same thing, lots of effects and stuff, and then there's the difference on if they are true-bypass or not. In an interview with Warran Haynes' guitar tech, he said they use a couple 25 footers and this is the case with losing some high end, but Warran apprently likes it that way. Gilmour went with EMG's in the 80's and 90's for part of this reason, because he runs so many effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.