Jump to content

New Waldorf Q+ Phoenix


Birdienumnum

Recommended Posts

  • Members

http://www.waldorfmusic.de/en/products/q_phoenix

 

"The Waldorf Q Series remains the standard for virtual modeled analog synthesizers.

 

Boasting no less than 58 endless rotaries for vital synthesis parameters, this front panel lends the term "generously appointed" new meaning.

 

Q Series synths leverage a remarkably flexible voicing section with up to five oscillators and two multimode filters per voice to deliver that peerless Waldorf sound.

 

The Q Plus even offers 16 real analog filters. Sumo-sized strings, ethereal pads, blistering lead sounds, bone-rattling bottom end, bizarre experimental soundscapes, coruscating arpeggio clusters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So the salient differences seem to be "16 analog filters with resonance and analog distortion" for the Q+ ($3299) only, and 100 voices as opposed to 32 with the Q ($2299). I definitely think it's worth it to get the Q+. Now how to get $3000? Hmmm . . .


Goodnight!
:)

 

My plan is to wait until bonus time (end of January) and see what kind of progress we have on the Stromberg. It it looks like it's way in the future, I'm going to try to find me one of these - I figure that I can sell my yellow Q and maybe some other stuff, which will bring down the price a little...damn. I've always wanted one of these. On the one hand, the price is higher than the Andromeda, and the Andromeda has even more in the way of modulations, as well as having analog oscillators. But, damn - I actually prefer the sound, workflow, and attitude of the Waldorf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

My plan is to wait until bonus time (end of January) and see what kind of progress we have on the Stromberg. It it looks like it's way in the future, I'm going to try to find me one of these - I figure that I can sell my yellow Q and maybe some other stuff, which will bring down the price a little...damn. I've always wanted one of these. On the one hand, the price is higher than the Andromeda, and the Andromeda has even more in the way of modulations, as well as having analog oscillators. But, damn - I actually prefer the sound, workflow, and attitude of the Waldorf.

 

 

Its a tough one but, at the end of the day the andy is just a very very good, highly modulatable real analog synth and many other synths therefore can sound similar.

 

Nothing sounds like a Waldorf Q+ on heat however.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

are they called Q's because the filter self-resonates?

 

 

In general, digital synths with self-oscillating resonant filters tend to be speaker-blowers...worst offender being the K5000s. The Q's resonance is harsh as well...I'd imagine this harshness is abated in the Q+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In
general
, digital synths with self-oscillating resonant filters tend to be speaker-blowers...worst offender being the K5000s. The Q's resonance is harsh as well...I'd imagine this harshness is abated in the Q+.

 

They have side to side comparison demos on the above link - first digital Q, then analog Q+, playing the same thing. Quite illuminating. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I thought it was the use of real analog filters (not on all, but several notable products) that made Waldorf stand out?

 

 

nah - Waldorf stands out because of the ui combined with the 'waldorf sound' make them excellent for a wide range of sounds, all the way through seriously deranged. The analog filters are a bonus, but I'd still love their stuff without them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

According to Chuck @ AH, "Between Nova and ourselves, I think only a handful of units (6 +) have made it into the country."

 

 

Yay for Switzerland then. I was in a little corner synth shop where they've got, among lots of software and mixing stuff, a TI Polar, Little Phatty, Lead 2X, some of the little Korg keyboards, and a shiny Q+. They've had it for almost a month apparantly.

 

Just a data point.

 

B>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...