Jump to content

Best SOUNDING performances.


Cross Eyed Mary

Recommended Posts

  • Members

And by that, i mean the actual SOUND of the band. It seems live performances have gone down the {censored}ter with all the high, clicky, attack filled sounds. Everything is too {censored}ing bright and dry these days.

 

[YOUTUBE]ofNvYlIsV9E[/YOUTUBE]

 

Everything here just oozes this big, warm, organic tone.

 

[YOUTUBE]4XMgyibjqgc&feature=related[/YOUTUBE]

 

Everything just sounds so natural here, and it feels like you could hear a {censored}ing pin drop.

 

 

Lets see some others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw Roger Water's play here in Brisbane in 2007, and i gotta tell you, it was by far the best sound i've EVER heard at any concert. It was literally amazing, they used a lot of 3d effects with ambient sounds coming from behind you.

 

[YOUTUBE]uz9cy8i7TmE[/YOUTUBE]

 

[YOUTUBE]azl33i6-JVM[/YOUTUBE]

 

I didn't record these, but it seems quite a few people recorded the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

With the ultimate destination of recordings these days being {censored}ty MP3s, I wouldn't look for sound getting better, ever.

 

 

{censored}ing 'a. I was watching an interview with the owners of Daptone records (a tape-only studio in NY, most famous for recording Sharon Jones and Amy Winehouse), they claimed that tape is the only thing that can truly capture the highs of certain wind instruments like sax and trumpet, and that the real tone gets pretty much lost in digital format.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I've heard good digital, it can be done right, but good sound isn't even a niche market anymore, it's a fringe.

 

Part of the problem is the loudness war--the suits want their record to be louder than anybody else's, so they tell the mastering engineer to push the signal into digital overs on a near-constant basis. On a hi-rez system this sounds brutally bad, but as I say, if the end market is MP3s and $4 earbuds, what's the use of preserving good sound?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Well, I've heard good digital, it can be done right, but good sound isn't even a niche market anymore, it's a fringe.


Part of the problem is the loudness war--the suits want their record to be louder than anybody else's, so they tell the mastering engineer to push the signal into digital overs on a near-constant basis. On a hi-rez system this sounds brutally bad, but as I say, if the end market is MP3s and $4 earbuds, what's the use of preserving good sound?

 

 

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/17777619/the_death_of_high_fidelity

 

This article is really great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...