Jump to content

Faber

Members
  • Posts

    14,352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Faber

  1. I just find it pain weird that anyone bothers about it.Its there ,its playable ,its just a musical instrument .its like all these odd people spouting off about a Modern player and similar jaguar shaped guitar .Who cares if it called a Jaguar .Who cares if a tele has two humbuckers .They are all guitars...beginning and end of story.

     

    in every practical way I agree with this sentiment, but since we're just discussing aesthetics, I prefer the look without the rings :)

  2. It would be interesting to try and I'd like to give it a go. I can see how this can simplify things a lot, prevent volume wars etc. On the other hand my gut feeling is that I would miss the direct interaction with an amp/speaker. As already stated guitar + amp is one instrument. But it's worth a shot

  3. He'd be using modeling amps, modeling guitars, digital effects, MIDI, Floyd Roses, self-tuning robot guitars, and every other bit of innovative musical technology that cranky Hendrix traditionalists have been complaining about for the last 40 years.


    And he'd be on Twitter.

    In a perfect scenario where he continued to perform at the top of his game, sure. A more real world scenario would be that like most others he'd be set in his ways by middle age and would perfer to stay within his comfort zone. If the drugs didn't fry his brain first that is. But the thought of Hendrix with say, a Parker Fly, a Line 6 amp and a TC multiefect board is a thrilling one

  4. I can see where you come from, but Green's, playing is much more fluid and jammy like Duane Allman, but could get agressive (see Green manalishi)

     

    He certainly could get agressive too, but to my ears it's a different kind - I know the dangers of making psychological judgements based on recordings but I always got the impression that EC on Beano was a player hell bent on proving himself wheras to me PG always sound a bit more self confident, a bit more mature if that makes sense.

     

    I agree about the jamming thing - Green (and Kirwan!) were better at the long form jamming than EC. Even if cream was far bigger.

  5. Clapton (on Beano, anyway) sounded a lot more studied, respectful, and reserved, to me. Green's playing sounded like there was nothing, no theory, no attempts at "authenticity," no imitations of somebody else's "thing," no Peter Green, even, between his raw emotions and those strings.


    It wouldn't have even mattered if Green had played some other instrument, instead; that's the kind of {censored} that's just got to fight its way out, somehow.


    Clapton impresses the hell out of me.

    Peter Green scares the hell out of me.

     

    I agree about the studied part, but actually, I always thought EC came across as the more agressive of the two *IF* you compare Beano with Fleetwood Mac or Mayall era Green.

     

    I also hear a lot of tradition in PG's playing - different influences from EC and a different approach to them, but to my ear there's no doubt Green did as much and as deep listening as Clapton.

     

    Of course, at the end of the day they were both outstanding in their way

  6. Greeny -- best of the 1960s Brit blues guys. NO EXCEPTION.

     

    He's up there to be sure, not sure i would say that he was better than beano era EC or indeed that it makes sense to rate them as better/worse. But that's probably for another thread.

     

    PG is one of the greatest blues players ever - one of the truly unique voices in the genre.

  7. Do you want something like Sco's sounds, or something like fusion tones in general?

     

    Either way I'd say that a RAT is a nice place to start. And of course the TubeScreamer would be a good choice.

×
×
  • Create New...