Jump to content

Faber

Members
  • Posts

    14,352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Faber

  1. Another vote for Lukather. he really is an outstanding player. Sambora need an honourable mention - may not be a boundary pusher, but he's a fine player within his genre
  2. The player first and foremost - look at a guy like Brent Mason: his tele is pretty much everything that tele purist find sacreligious, and he sure make it twang well enough
  3. I just find it pain weird that anyone bothers about it.Its there ,its playable ,its just a musical instrument .its like all these odd people spouting off about a Modern player and similar jaguar shaped guitar .Who cares if it called a Jaguar .Who cares if a tele has two humbuckers .They are all guitars...beginning and end of story. in every practical way I agree with this sentiment, but since we're just discussing aesthetics, I prefer the look without the rings
  4. It's a popularity poll made by people of a certain demographic, age, income etc. Nothing more or less. Nothing worth getting too worked up about.
  5. It would be interesting to try and I'd like to give it a go. I can see how this can simplify things a lot, prevent volume wars etc. On the other hand my gut feeling is that I would miss the direct interaction with an amp/speaker. As already stated guitar + amp is one instrument. But it's worth a shot
  6. I don't exactly think it's an abomination but I think it would look better without the rings. They clutter the look a bit
  7. He'd be using modeling amps, modeling guitars, digital effects, MIDI, Floyd Roses, self-tuning robot guitars, and every other bit of innovative musical technology that cranky Hendrix traditionalists have been complaining about for the last 40 years. And he'd be on Twitter. In a perfect scenario where he continued to perform at the top of his game, sure. A more real world scenario would be that like most others he'd be set in his ways by middle age and would perfer to stay within his comfort zone. If the drugs didn't fry his brain first that is. But the thought of Hendrix with say, a Parker Fly, a Line 6 amp and a TC multiefect board is a thrilling one
  8. The gear market round here is dead. The same ads not moving and no new items coming up. Buyers don't have the money in this crisis and any seller than can afford to do so have probably decided to wait it out till the economy comes round
  9. The only one I've ever named is my ugly as hell unpainted parts build i.e. The IKEAcaster. Generally I'd feel weird naming inanimate objects. ymmv
  10. I don't really the the offensiveness of those quotes - it's not like he was being in any way derogative to black people. OK so the "n word" isn't one to be used in polite conversation, but taking offense over the mere occurence of a word regardless of its intent is silly.
  11. I can see where you come from, but Green's, playing is much more fluid and jammy like Duane Allman, but could get agressive (see Green manalishi) He certainly could get agressive too, but to my ears it's a different kind - I know the dangers of making psychological judgements based on recordings but I always got the impression that EC on Beano was a player hell bent on proving himself wheras to me PG always sound a bit more self confident, a bit more mature if that makes sense. I agree about the jamming thing - Green (and Kirwan!) were better at the long form jamming than EC. Even if cream was far bigger.
  12. Clapton (on Beano, anyway) sounded a lot more studied, respectful, and reserved, to me. Green's playing sounded like there was nothing, no theory, no attempts at "authenticity," no imitations of somebody else's "thing," no Peter Green, even, between his raw emotions and those strings. It wouldn't have even mattered if Green had played some other instrument, instead; that's the kind of {censored} that's just got to fight its way out, somehow. Clapton impresses the hell out of me. Peter Green scares the hell out of me. I agree about the studied part, but actually, I always thought EC came across as the more agressive of the two *IF* you compare Beano with Fleetwood Mac or Mayall era Green. I also hear a lot of tradition in PG's playing - different influences from EC and a different approach to them, but to my ear there's no doubt Green did as much and as deep listening as Clapton. Of course, at the end of the day they were both outstanding in their way
  13. Aside from OK Computer and In Rainbows the OP is spot on. Says something about a band when their second or third best album is that good
  14. Greeny -- best of the 1960s Brit blues guys. NO EXCEPTION. He's up there to be sure, not sure i would say that he was better than beano era EC or indeed that it makes sense to rate them as better/worse. But that's probably for another thread. PG is one of the greatest blues players ever - one of the truly unique voices in the genre.
  15. of those - the LP. I could go with either for cleans, but I much perfer to work a humbucker equipped guitar for distorted sounds. But of course the correct answer is ES-335.
  16. Great guitarist that helped produce some godawful cheesy music - seriosly, how can folks here rip on TOTO when later VH is just as cheese infested. The first album is plain awesome RnR though
  17. You gonna grow old no matter what, so you might as well have fun along the way. Do what you feel like doing
  18. They really should bring those back. Lovely guitars
  19. Ibanez John Scofield (on my ugly ass couch)
  20. Oh yeah, another thing is that a lot fusion guitar is very compressed indeed. So getting both a overdrive/distortion pedal and a comp might be a good idea
  21. Do you want something like Sco's sounds, or something like fusion tones in general? Either way I'd say that a RAT is a nice place to start. And of course the TubeScreamer would be a good choice.
  22. He's been using a RAT since some time in the 80s. I think some of his drive tones are also from those Mesa Boogie Mark II or IIIs he was using for a good long while.
×
×
  • Create New...