Members RobGLA Posted October 30, 2012 Members Share Posted October 30, 2012 Here's a sample lesson from my online classroom: Using The Melodic Minor Scale Over The V Chord (ii-V-I) Part 2http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pzxRgQD1pE Cheers, Rob TrueFire(.com) Sherpa Instructorhttp://truefire.com/guitar-sherpa/sh...s.html?id=4238 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members c+t in b Posted October 30, 2012 Members Share Posted October 30, 2012 Originally Posted by RobGLA Here's a sample lesson from my online classroom: Using The Melodic Minor Scale Over The V Chord (ii-V-I) Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pzxRgQD1pE Cheers, Rob TrueFire(.com) Sherpa Instructor http://truefire.com/guitar-sherpa/sh...s.html?id=4238 I'm always confused when i see people teach this concept this specific way, ie melodic minor 1/2 step above the V. Why not just say to use Super Locrian over the V rather than thinking polytonally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RobGLA Posted October 30, 2012 Author Members Share Posted October 30, 2012 I completely understand your point.But for me, I teach the Melodic Minor scale as a stand alone scale with many different applications. I have students learn simple one octave patterns of it then use it in a variety of contexts, such as minor with a raised 7th, bringing out the #11 on non-functioning dominant chords and achieving the altered sound hitting chord alterations on a functioning V chord. (Super Locrian). I think it's easier to think in terms of one scale for a lot of these sounds, rather than using different scale names.But really it's whatever works to get the sounds into a student's ear, so it's really all good, whatever you call it as long as they can hear the result.Thanks,Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.