Compare... DS-2 Vs. Jeckyl & Hyde (Hyde side)

[88mm]

So what about it? I have a DS-2 and like it enough. It stack decent with my Muff and Fuzz Faces. But how about the J&H? Extra TS side but how does the Hyde side stack with fuzz pedals and how does it sound by itself?

I want the hyde side for Heavy rythym stuff (not metal).

 

Thanks.

[Jbrazz]

So what about it? I have a DS-2 and like it enough. It stack decent with my Muff and Fuzz Faces. But how about the J&H? Extra TS side but how does the Hyde side stack with fuzz pedals and how does it sound by itself? I want the hyde side for Heavy rythym stuff (not metal). Thanks.

 

 

for J&H just listen to the strokes:thu:

[88mm]

Bump before page 3

[88mm]

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....

[chump5150]

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....

 

 

You have PM.

[Ski_Dawg]

So what about it? I have a DS-2 and like it enough. It stack decent with my Muff and Fuzz Faces. But how about the J&H? Extra TS side but how does the Hyde side stack with fuzz pedals and how does it sound by itself? I want the hyde side for Heavy rythym stuff (not metal). Thanks.

 

 

I sounds fairly close to the Marshall Guv'nor reissue, at least it did with my gear. I A/B'd them side by side and they were close enough that I decided to take the Marshall back. As long as you tweak the EQ right it's great for heavy rhythm. The blunt side I keep with the tone at 3:00 and the EQ between 9:00 and 11:00. I hated the "sharp" setting until I turned the tone mostly all the way down and put the EQ at about 10:00. Blunt side is definitely smoother though.