Members Soundstorm Posted June 28, 2012 Members Share Posted June 28, 2012 I've had a Mark IIC+, Mark IV, and several other boogies. Just wondering how the first ones compare. How do you like it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members -Assy- Posted June 28, 2012 Members Share Posted June 28, 2012 Much less gain, but an awesome amp, especially if you're after that old school santana tone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soundstorm Posted June 28, 2012 Author Members Share Posted June 28, 2012 I generally use less gain than most when not using the fuzz pedal. Great rhythm tone I'm guessing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members benjamin801 Posted June 28, 2012 Members Share Posted June 28, 2012 I generally use less gain than most when not using the fuzz pedal. Great rhythm tone I'm guessing? The clean rhythm tone is fairly Fendery. Using the lead channel for rhythm tones will get you into Mick Jones (The Clash, not Foreigner) territory, as he used a Mark I into a Marshall 4x12 for almost all their music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members -Assy- Posted June 28, 2012 Members Share Posted June 28, 2012 I generally use less gain than most when not using the fuzz pedal. Great rhythm tone I'm guessing? I didn't like it as a rhythm tone. But a lead tone, omg Takes pedals well if I remember correctly. I prefer the mark II over the Mark I, and the Mark III is probably the best amp boogie has ever made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.