Jump to content

Any opinions on the Fishman Loudbox Mini?


DarkHorseJ27

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Surely, it is a fine amp, as Fishman makes good products all up and down the line.

 

But, for $399 you could get the new VOX ADA70 acoustice amp that has two complete channels with 1/4" and XLR inputs (with phantom power), 3-band EQ, independent reverb, chorus, and "color". Has DI out and stereo line in as well. It's 70 watts, and one of the channels has tube-preamp you can drive for some fat and warm tones if you like. 25 pounds.

 

Anyway, I'm going to get the VOX to replace my old Acoustisonic as soon as I can scrape the $$$ together.

 

Link to AGA70

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You may be correct. I am basing my decision on the VOX AC4TV electric guitar amp I got last year. It was a new product then, and is totally fine in every regard. VOX is on the game now, and I'm betting the AGA70 will better the AGA150, which gets high praises.

 

I really dig the dual XLR inputs with phantom power, because I'll be able to use a condenser mic on the guitar without needing another preamp.

 

But yeah, the Fishman Mini is surely in the hunt for awesome compact acoustic amp.

 

Good times...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I really dig the dual XLR inputs with phantom power, because I'll be able to use a condenser mic on the guitar without needing another preamp.


But yeah, the Fishman Mini is surely in the hunt for awesome compact acoustic amp.

 

 

Fishman definitely took a calculated risk on providing only one XLR for the mic (and no phantom power), and just a 1/4" jack for the instrument. This helped to keep the price down, and they figured that most of the performing world uses dynamic mics and plug-in acoustics on stage. I'm betting that they're right.

 

If you do use a condenser onstage, or need an XLR for your guitar, you're probably in a different league, and so might also be able to spend more money for your system. The Loudbox is not for that kind of performance level. It's a small 60-watt compact amp that serves most acoustic setups.

 

I reviewed this amp for the Musician's Friend catalog (disclosure: who employs me but doesn't tell me what to write), and I found it to be a great deal. Typical Fishman excellence all the way. My only criticism in the design is that they provided 2-band EQ for the mic and 3-band for the instrument. I would have done it the other way around. Most people have EQ on their onboard guitar preamp, but not for their mic. So the more-detailed EQ would have been better suited to the mic channel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I've had the Fishman Mini for about a week now. I think basically amplifying a acoustic guitar is always mildly frustrating, especially when played via an onboard pre-amp, as in my case (Takamine EAN 10 C). That said, I find the sound very defined, and very natural and warm. I'm more than content with what I got. I've had the rare experience of getting exactly what I was looking for. It's the kind of gear that will give you a wave of joy everytime you use it*. I doubt, however, that the unit would be loud enough for a coffeehouse gig, so if you gig a lot and want to be on the save side, you might consider the Loudbox 100.

 

One thing, though, a few days back it kept frizzling everytime I turned it on. I attribute that to the fact that the amp was an exhibit piece. No problems since, though. I will wait some more days, and return it if the frizzle occurs again, but only to get another mini. Other than that, craftsmanship-wise, the unit makes an amazing impression. And it's far, far lighter and more compact - and better-looking - than the Marshall counterpiece.

 

* if you're as much a gear nerd as I am, that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...